Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nutritional status and risk of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement assessment using the geriatric nutritional risk index and the controlling nutritional status score

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Nutritional status, a key marker of patient frailty, is an important prognostic factor after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Few investigations have evaluated the clinical usefulness of nutritional assessment tools for predicting the risk of mortality following TAVR.

Methods

A total of 412 patients with symptomatic severe AS who underwent TAVR between March 2010 and August 2017 were stratified into subgroups by their Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index [GNRI, low ≤ 98 vs. high > 98 (better nutritional status)] and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score [low ≤ 3 vs. high ≥ 4; (poorer nutritional status)]. The primary study outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year.

Results

Patients with low GNRI score showed a significantly higher 1-year mortality rate as compared to those with high GNRI score (13.0% vs. 3.2%, respectively; P = 0.001). Similarly, patients with high CONUT score had a significantly higher rate of 1-year mortality than those with low CONUT score (15.7% vs. 6.2%, respectively; P = 0.005). However, in multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models, low GNRI was the only independent predictor of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.77; 95% confidence interval 1.54–9.20; P = 0.004). Overall, integration of GNRI into conventional risk models of STS score or logistic EuroSCORE resulted in improved predictive value for mortality measured by the net reclassification improvement and the integrated discrimination improvement.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing TAVR, low GNRI (but not high CONUT score) was independently associated with a higher risk of 1-year mortality. Further research is required to determine whether nutritional screening and management can improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AS:

Aortic stenosis

BMI:

Body-mass index

CONUT:

Controlling nutritional status

CT:

Computed tomography

EuroSCORE:

Logistic European System for cardiac operative risk evaluation

GNRI:

Geriatric nutritional risk index

STS:

Society of thoracic surgeons

TAVR:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

VARC:

The valve academic research consortium

References

  1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, Kodali SK et al (2016) Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 374:1609–1620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thourani VH, Kodali S, Makkar RR, Herrmann HC, Williams M, Babaliaros V et al (2016) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Lancet (London, England) 387:2218–2225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thyregod HG, Steinbruchel DA, Ihlemann N, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P et al (2015) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: 1-year results from the all-comers NOTION randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2184–2194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM et al (2014) Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med 370:1790–1798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reardon MJ, Adams DH, Kleiman NS, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM et al (2015) 2-year outcomes in patients undergoing surgical or self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, Kleiman NS, Sondergaard L, Mumtaz M et al (2017) Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 376:1321–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Steinvil A, Buchanan KD, Kiramijyan S, Bond E, Rogers T, Koifman E et al (2018) Utility of an additive frailty tests index score for mortality risk assessment following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J 200:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Afilalo J, Lauck S, Kim DH, Lefevre T, Piazza N, Lachapelle K et al (2017) Frailty in older adults undergoing aortic valve replacement: the FRAILTY-AVR study. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouillanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C, Coulombel I, Vincent JP, Nicolis I et al (2005) Geriatric nutritional risk index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 82:777–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ignacio de Ulibarri J, Gonzalez-Madrono A, de Villar NG, Gonzalez P, Gonzalez B et al (2005) CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population. Nutr Hosp 20:38–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sze S, Zhang J, Pellicori P, Morgan D, Hoye A, Clark AL (2017) Prognostic value of simple frailty and malnutrition screening tools in patients with acute heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Clin Res Cardiol 106:533–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shibata K, Yamamoto M, Kano S, Koyama Y, Shimura T, Kagase A et al (2018) Importance of geriatric nutritional risk index assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J 202:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun X, Luo L, Zhao X, Ye P (2017) Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of all-cause mortality in elderly hypertensive patients: a prospective follow-up study. BMJ Open 7:e015649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwakami N, Nagai T, Furukawa TA, Sugano Y, Honda S, Okada A et al (2017) Prognostic value of malnutrition assessed by controlling nutritional status score for long-term mortality in patients with acute heart failure. Int J Cardiol 230:529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cereda E, Zagami A, Vanotti A, Piffer S, Pedrolli C (2008) Geriatric nutritional risk index and overall-cause mortality prediction in institutionalised elderly: a 3-year survival analysis. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 27:717–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wada H, Dohi T, Miyauchi K, Doi S, Konishi H, Naito R et al (2017) Prognostic impact of nutritional status assessed by the Controlling Nutritional Status score in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol 106:875–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon SH, Lefevre T, Ahn JM, Perlman GY, Dvir D, Latib A et al (2016) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early- and new-generation devices in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:1195–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cereda E, Klersy C, Pedrolli C, Cameletti B, Bonardi C, Quarleri L et al (2015) The geriatric nutritional risk index predicts hospital length of stay and in-hospital weight loss in elderly patients. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 34:74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wada H, Dohi T, Miyauchi K, Dai S, Naito R, Konishi H et al (2017) Prognostic impact of the geriatric nutritional risk index on long-term outcomes in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 119:1740–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abd-El-Gawad WM, Abou-Hashem RM, El Maraghy MO, Amin GE et al (2014) The validity of geriatric nutrition risk index: simple tool for prediction of nutritional-related complication of hospitalized elderly patients. comparison with mini nutritional assessment. Clin Nutr 33:1108–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuroda D, Sawayama H, Kurashige J, Iwatsuki M, Eto T, Tokunaga R et al (2018) Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is a prognostic marker for gastric cancer patients after curative resection. Gastric Cancer 21:204–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH et al (2012) Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1438–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB (2004) Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med 23:2109–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, Steyerberg EW (2011) Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 30:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cook NR, Ridker PM (2009) Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures. Ann Intern Med 150:795–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenhek R, Iung B, Tornos P, Antunes MJ, Prendergast BD, Otto CM, Kappetein AP, Stepinska J, Kaden JJ, Naber CK, Acarturk E, Gohlke-Barwolf C et al (2012) ESC working group on valvular heart disease position paper: assessing the risk of interventions in patients with valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 33:822–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Afilalo J, Mottillo S, Eisenberg MJ, Alexander KP, Noiseux N, Perrault LP et al (2012) Addition of frailty and disability to cardiac surgery risk scores identifies elderly patients at high risk of mortality or major morbidity. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5:222–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alfredsson J, Stebbins A, Brennan JM, Matsouaka R, Afilalo J, Peterson ED et al (2016) Gait speed predicts 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the society of thoracic surgeons/american college of cardiology transcatheter valve therapy registry. Circulation 133:1351–1359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Koifman E, Kiramijyan S, Negi SI, Didier R, Escarcega RO, Minha S, Gai J et al (2016) Body mass index association with survival in severe aortic stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 88:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Koifman E, Magalhaes MA, Ben-Dor I, Kiramijyan S, Escarcega RO, Fang C et al (2015) Impact of pre-procedural serum albumin levels on outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 115:1260–1264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ling CH, Taekema D, de Craen AJ, Gussekloo J, Westendorp RG, Maier AB (2010) Handgrip strength and mortality in the oldest old population: the Leiden 85-plus study. CMAJ 182:429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Puls M, Sobisiak B, Bleckmann A, Jacobshagen C, Danner BC, Hunlich M et al (2014) Impact of frailty on short- and long-term morbidity and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: risk assessment by Katz Index of activities of daily living. EuroIntervention 10:609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Green P, Woglom AE, Genereux P, Daneault B, Paradis JM, Schnell S et al (2012) The impact of frailty status on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older adults with severe aortic stenosis: a single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5:974–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Afilalo J, Alexander KP, Mack MJ, Maurer MS, Green P, Allen LA et al (2014) Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:747–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamamoto M, Shimura T, Kano S, Kagase A, Kodama A, Sago M et al (2017) Prognostic value of hypoalbuminemia after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (from the Japanese multicenter OCEAN-TAVI Registry). Am J Cardiol 119:770–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bogdan A, Barbash IM, Segev A, Fefer P, Bogdan SN, Asher E et al (2016) Albumin correlates with all-cause mortality in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 12:e1057–e1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nakagomi A, Kohashi K, Morisawa T, Kosugi M, Endoh I, Kusama Y et al (2016) Nutritional status is associated with inflammation and predicts a poor outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. J Atheroscler Thromb 23:713–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kunimura A, Ishii H, Uetani T, Aoki T, Harada K, Hirayama K et al (2017) Impact of nutritional assessment and body mass index on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 230:653–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Janes H, Pepe MS, Gu W (2008) Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Intern Med 149:751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Seoul, Korea. The sponsors played no role in this study. There was no industry involvement in the design or conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duk-Woo Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K., Ahn, JM., Kang, DY. et al. Nutritional status and risk of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement assessment using the geriatric nutritional risk index and the controlling nutritional status score. Clin Res Cardiol 109, 161–171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01497-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01497-9

Keywords

Navigation