Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed

  • Review
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the year 2017, more than 21,000 published references can be found in PubMed when entering the search term “cardiac surgery”. This review focusses on conventional cardiac surgery, considering the new interventional techniques only if they were directly compared to classic techniques but also entails aspects of perioperative intensive care management. The publications last year provided a plethora of new and interesting information that helped to quantify classic surgical treatment effects and provided new guidelines for the management of structural heart disease, which made comparisons to interventional techniques easier. The field of coronary bypass surgery was primarily filled with confirmatory evidence for the beneficial role of coronary artery bypass grafting for complex coronary disease and equal outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention for less complex disease including main stem lesions. For aortic valve treatment, the new guidelines provide an equal recommendation for surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement for high and intermediate risk giving specific check lists to individualize decision-making by the heart team. For low-risk aortic stenosis, surgical valve replacement remains the primary indication. For the mitral valve, the importance of surgical experience of the individual surgeon on short- and long-term outcome was presented and the prognostic impact of mitral repair for primary mitral regurgitation was emphasized. In addition, there were many relevant and interesting other contributions from the purely operative arena in the fields of tricuspid disease as well as terminal heart failure (i.e., transplantation and ventricular assist devices). While this article attempts to summarize the most pertinent publications, it does not have the expectation of being complete and cannot be free of individual interpretation. As in recent years, it provides a condensed summary that is intended to give the reader “solid ground” for up-to-date decision-making in cardiac surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Landoni G, Lomivorotov VV, Alvaro G, Lobreglio R, Pisano A, Guarracino F, Calabro MG, Grigoryev EV, Likhvantsev VV, Salgado-Filho MF, Bianchi A, Pasyuga VV, Baiocchi M, Pappalardo F, Monaco F, Boboshko VA, Abubakirov MN, Amantea B, Lembo R, Brazzi L, Verniero L, Bertini P, Scandroglio AM, Bove T, Belletti A, Michienzi MG, Shukevich DL, Zabelina TS, Bellomo R, Zangrillo A (2017) Levosimendan for hemodynamic support after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 376(21):2021–2031. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1616325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cholley B, Caruba T, Grosjean S, Amour J, Ouattara A, Villacorta J, Miguet B, Guinet P, Levy F, Squara P, Ait Hamou N, Carillion A, Boyer J, Boughenou MF, Rosier S, Robin E, Radutoiu M, Durand M, Guidon C, Desebbe O, Charles-Nelson A, Menasche P, Rozec B, Girard C, Fellahi JL, Pirracchio R, Chatellier G (2017) Effect of levosimendan on low cardiac output syndrome in patients with low ejection fraction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass: The LICORN randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(6):548–556. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.9973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Montaigne D, Marechal X, Modine T, Coisne A, Mouton S, Fayad G, Ninni S, Klein C, Ortmans S, Seunes C, Potelle C, Berthier A, Gheeraert C, Piveteau C, Deprez R, Eeckhoute J, Duez H, Lacroix D, Deprez B, Jegou B, Koussa M, Edme JL, Lefebvre P, Staels B (2017) Daytime variation of perioperative myocardial injury in cardiac surgery and its prevention by Rev-Erbalpha antagonism: a single-centre propensity-matched cohort study and a randomised study. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32132-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen S, Bjorck L, Jeppsson A, Giang KW, Falk K, Maatta S, Sandstrom TZ, Rosengren A (2017) Trends in mortality risks among 94,328 patients surviving 30 days after a first isolated coronary artery bypass graft procedure from 1987 to 2006: a population-based study. Int J Cardiol 244:316–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaudino M, Antoniades C, Benedetto U, Deb S, Di Franco A, Di Giammarco G, Fremes S, Glineur D, Grau J, He GW, Marinelli D, Ohmes LB, Patrono C, Puskas J, Tranbaugh R, Girardi LN, Taggart DP (2017) Mechanisms, consequences, and prevention of coronary graft failure. Circulation 136(18):1749–1764. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.027597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruzieh M, Moza A, Siddegowda Bangalore B, Schwann T, Tinkel JL (2017) Effect of transradial catheterisation on patency rates of radial arteries used as a conduit for coronary bypass. Heart Lung Circ 26(3):296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2016.07.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdallah MS, Wang K, Magnuson EA, Osnabrugge RL, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Mohr FA, Serruys PW, Cohen DJ (2017) Quality of life after surgery or DES in patients with 3-vessel or left main disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(16):2039–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baron SJ, Chinnakondepalli K, Magnuson EA, Kandzari DE, Puskas JD, Ben-Yehuda O, van Es GA, Taggart DP, Morice MC, Lembo NJ, Brown WM 3rd, Banning A, Simonton CA, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, Stone GW, Cohen DJ (2017) Quality-of-life after everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left-main disease: results from the EXCEL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(25):3113–3122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Samano N, Bodin L, Karlsson J, Geijer H, Arbeus M, Souza D (2017) Graft patency is associated with higher health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 24(3):388–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Faerber G, Zacher M, Reents W, Boergermann J, Kappert U, Boening A, Diegeler A, Doenst T (2017) Female sex is not a risk factor for post procedural mortality in coronary bypass surgery in the elderly: a secondary analysis of the GOPCABE trial. PLoS One 12(8):e0184038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts JK, Rao SV, Shaw LK, Gallup DS, Marroquin OC, Patel UD (2017) Comparative efficacy of coronary revascularization procedures for multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Cardiol 119(9):1344–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.01.029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bangalore S, Guo Y, Samadashvili Z, Blecker S, Xu J, Hannan EL (2015) Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 372(13):1213–1222. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1412168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weimar C, Bilbilis K, Rekowski J, Holst T, Beyersdorf F, Breuer M, Dahm M, Diegeler A, Kowalski A, Martens S, Mohr FW, Ondrasek J, Reiter B, Roth P, Seipelt R, Siggelkow M, Steinhoff G, Moritz A, Wilhelmi M, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Diener HC, Jakob H, Ose C, Scherag A, Knipp SC (2017) Safety of simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy versus isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial. Stroke 48(10):2769–2775. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.117.017570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Atassi T, Kimmaliardjuk DM, Dagenais C, Bourke M, Lam BK, Rubens FD (2017) Should we ablate atrial fibrillation during coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement? Ann Thorac Surg 104(2):515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caliskan E, Sahin A, Yilmaz M, Seifert B, Hinzpeter R, Alkadhi H, Cox JL, Holubec T, Reser D, Falk V, Grunenfelder J, Genoni M, Maisano F, Salzberg SP, Emmert MY (2017) Epicardial left atrial appendage AtriClip occlusion reduces the incidence of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery. Europace. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palmerini T, Serruys P, Kappetein AP, Genereux P, Riva DD, Reggiani LB, Christiansen EH, Holm NR, Thuesen L, Makikallio T, Morice MC, Ahn JM, Park SJ, Thiele H, Boudriot E, Sabatino M, Romanello M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Cavalcante R, Sabik JF, Stone GW (2017) Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4686 patients. Am Heart J 190:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sa M, Soares AF, Miranda RGA, Araujo ML, Menezes AM, Silva FPV, Lima RC (2017) CABG surgery remains the best option for patients with left main coronary disease in comparison with PCI-DES: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 32(5):408–416. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0081

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah R, Morsy MS, Weiman DS, Vetrovec GW (2017) Meta-analysis comparing coronary artery bypass grafting to drug-eluting stents and to medical therapy alone for left main coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 120(1):63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takagi H, Ando T, Umemoto T (2017) Drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left-main coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nystrom T, Sartipy U, Franzen S, Eliasson B, Gudbjornsdottir S, Miftaraj M, Lagerqvist B, Svensson AM, Holzmann MJ (2017) PCI versus CABG in patients with type 1 diabetes and multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(12):1441–1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikeno F, Brooks MM, Nakagawa K, Kim MK, Kaneda H, Mitsutake Y, Vlachos HA, Schwartz L, Frye RL, Kelsey SF, Waseda K, Hlatky MA (2017) SYNTAX score and long-term outcomes: the BARI-2D trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(4):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Gerry S, Benedetto U, Flather M (2016) Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts. N Engl J Med 375(26):2540–2549. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1610021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Locker C, Schaff HV, Daly RC, Bell MR, Frye RL, Stulak JM, Said SM, Dearani JA, Joyce LD, Greason KL, Pochettino A, Li Z, Lennon RJ, Lerman A (2017) Multiarterial grafts improve the rate of early major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: analysis of 12,615 patients with multivessel disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 52(4):746–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Iribarne A, Schmoker JD, Malenka DJ, Leavitt BJ, McCullough JN, Weldner PW, DeSimone JP, Westbrook BM, Quinn RD, Klemperer JD, Sardella GL, Kramer RS, Olmstead EM, DiScipio AW (2017) Does use of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting reduce long-term risk of repeat coronary revascularization? A multicenter analysis. Circulation 136(18):1676–1685. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.027405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Janiec M, Dimberg A, Nazari Shafti TZ, Lagerqvist B, Lindblom RPF (2017) No improvements in long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial grafts as a second conduit: a Swedish nationwide registry study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Samano N, Geijer H, Liden M, Fremes S, Bodin L, Souza D (2015) The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150(4):880–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shroyer AL, Hattler B, Wagner TH, Collins JF, Baltz JH, Quin JA, Almassi GH, Kozora E, Bakaeen F, Cleveland JC Jr, Bishawi M, Grover FL (2017) Five-year outcomes after on-pump and off-pump coronary-artery bypass. N Engl J Med 377(7):623–632. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1614341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Straka Z, Piegas LS, Avezum A, Akar AR, Lanas Zanetti F, Jain AR, Noiseux N, Padmanabhan C, Bahamondes JC, Novick RJ, Tao L, Olavegogeascoechea PA, Airan B, Sulling TA, Whitlock RP, Ou Y, Gao P, Pettit S, Yusuf S (2016) Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med 375(24):2359–2368. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Diegeler A, Borgermann J, Kappert U, Breuer M, Boning A, Ursulescu A, Rastan A, Holzhey D, Treede H, Riess FC, Veeckmann P, Asfoor A, Reents W, Zacher M, Hilker M (2013) Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 368(13):1189–1198. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Filardo G, Hamman BL, da Graca B, Sass DM, Machala NJ, Ismail S, Pollock BD, Collinsworth AW, Grayburn PA (2018) Efficacy and effectiveness of on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis of mortality and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155(1):172–179.e175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takagi H, Ando T, Mitta S (2017) Meta-analysis comparing ≥ 10-year mortality of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 120(11):1933–1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan H, Uzzaman M, Benedetto U, Butt S, Raja SG (2017) On- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for octogenarians: a meta-analysis of comparative studies involving 27,623 patients. Int J Surg 47:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao DF, Edelman JJ, Seco M, Bannon PG, Wilson MK, Byrom MJ, Thourani V, Lamy A, Taggart DP, Puskas JD, Vallely MP (2017) Coronary artery bypass grafting with and without manipulation of the ascending aorta: a network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(8):924–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kowalewski M, Pawliszak W, Malvindi PG, Bokszanski MP, Perlinski D, Raffa GM, Kowalkowska ME, Zaborowska K, Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Kowalewski J, Tarelli G, Taggart DP, Anisimowicz L (2016) Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151(1):60–77 e58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Furukawa N, Kuss O, Preindl K, Renner A, Aboud A, Hakim-Meibodi K, Benzinger M, Puhler T, Ensminger S, Fujita B, Becker T, Gummert JF, Borgermann J (2017) Anaortic off-pump versus clampless off-pump using the PAS-Port device versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: mid-term results from a matched propensity score analysis of 5422 unselected patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 52(4):760–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Doenst T, Lamelas J (2017) Do we have enough evidence for minimally-invasive cardiac surgery? A critical review of scientific and non-scientific information. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 58(4):613–623. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0021-9509.16.09446-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nambiar P, Kumar S, Mittal CM, Saksena K (2018) Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries: will this be the future? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155(1):190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Munoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjogren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38(36):2739–2791. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Fleisher LA, Jneid H, Mack MJ, McLeod CJ, O’Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC Focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 135(25):e1159–e1195. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, Kleiman NS, Sondergaard L, Mumtaz M, Adams DH, Deeb GM, Maini B, Gada H, Chetcuti S, Gleason T, Heiser J, Lange R, Merhi W, Oh JK, Olsen PS, Piazza N, Williams M, Windecker S, Yakubov SJ, Grube E, Makkar R, Lee JS, Conte J, Vang E, Nguyen H, Chang Y, Mugglin AS, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP (2017) Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 376(14):1321–1331. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, Kodali SK, Thourani VH, Tuzcu EM, Miller DC, Herrmann HC, Doshi D, Cohen DJ, Pichard AD, Kapadia S, Dewey T, Babaliaros V, Szeto WY, Williams MR, Kereiakes D, Zajarias A, Greason KL, Whisenant BK, Hodson RW, Moses JW, Trento A, Brown DL, Fearon WF, Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Jaber WA, Anderson WN, Alu MC, Webb JG (2016) Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 374(17):1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1514616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Doenst T, Essa Y, Jacoub K, Moschovas A, Gonzalez-Lopez D, Kirov H, Diab M, Bargenda S, Faerber G (2017) Cardiac surgery 2016 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 106(11):851–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1113-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Doenst T, Struning C, Moschovas A, Gonzalez-Lopez D, Essa Y, Kirov H, Diab M, Faerber G (2016) Cardiac surgery 2015 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 105(10):801–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-016-1013-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Doenst T, Struning C, Moschovas A, Gonzalez-Lopez D, Valchanov I, Kirov H, Diab M, Faerber G (2015) Cardiac surgery 2014 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 104(12):1006–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0914-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Doenst T (2017) Durability of tissue valves: only time will tell? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 154(4):1243–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Eggebrecht H, Vaquerizo B, Moris C, Bossone E, Lammer J, Czerny M, Zierer A, Schrofel H, Kim WK, Walther T, Scholtz S, Rudolph T, Hengstenberg C, Kempfert J, Spaziano M, Lefevre T, Bleiziffer S, Schofer J, Mehilli J, Seiffert M, Naber C, Biancari F, Eckner D, Cornet C, Lhermusier T, Philippart R, Siljander A, Giuseppe Cerillo A, Blackman D, Chieffo A, Kahlert P, Czerwinska-Jelonkiewicz K, Szymanski P, Landes U, Kornowski R, Onofrio A, Kaulfersch C, Sondergaard L, Mylotte D, Mehta RH, De Backer O (2017) Incidence and outcomes of emergent cardiac surgery during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): insights from the European Registry on Emergent Cardiac Surgery during TAVI (EuRECS-TAVI). Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hafiz AM, Kalra A, Ramadan R, Poulin M-F, Andalib A, Phillips CT, Bhatt DL, Reardon MJ, Kleiman NS, Popma JJ (2017) Clinical or symptomatic leaflet thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the U.S. FDA MAUDE database. Struct Heart 1(5–6):256–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748706.2017.1366086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ruile P, Jander N, Blanke P, Schoechlin S, Reinohl J, Gick M, Rothe J, Langer M, Leipsic J, Buettner HJ, Neumann FJ, Pache G (2017) Course of early subclinical leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with or without oral anticoagulation. Clin Res Cardiol 106(2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-016-1052-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Egbe AC, Connolly HM, Pellikka PA, Schaff HV, Hanna R, Maleszewski JJ, Nkomo VT, Pislaru SV (2017) Outcomes of Warfarin therapy for bioprosthetic valve thrombosis of surgically implanted valves: a prospective study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10(4):379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Afilalo J, Lauck S, Kim DH, Lefevre T, Piazza N, Lachapelle K, Martucci G, Lamy A, Labinaz M, Peterson MD, Arora RC, Noiseux N, Rassi A, Palacios IF, Genereux P, Lindman BR, Asgar AW, Kim CA, Trnkus A, Morais JA, Langlois Y, Rudski LG, Morin JF, Popma JJ, Webb JG, Perrault LP (2017) Frailty in older adults undergoing aortic valve replacement: the FRAILTY-AVR study. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(6):689–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mack MJ, Acker MA, Gelijns AC, Overbey JR, Parides MK, Browndyke JN, Groh MA, Moskowitz AJ, Jeffries NO, Ailawadi G, Thourani VH, Moquete EG, Iribarne A, Voisine P, Perrault LP, Bowdish ME, Bilello M, Davatzikos C, Mangusan RF, Winkle RA, Smith PK, Michler RE, Miller MA, O’Sullivan KL, Taddei-Peters WC, Rose EA, Weisel RD, Furie KL, Bagiella E, Moy CS, O’Gara PT, Messe SR (2017) Effect of cerebral embolic protection devices on CNS infarction in surgical aortic valve replacement: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(6):536–547. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.9479

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Seeger J, Gonska B, Otto M, Rottbauer W, Wohrle J (2017) Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement significantly reduces death and stroke compared with unprotected procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10(22):2297–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. David TE, Feindel CM (1992) An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 103(4):617–621 (discussion 622)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sarsam MA, Yacoub M (1993) Remodeling of the aortic valve anulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 105(3):435–438

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schneider U, Feldner SK, Hofmann C, Schope J, Wagenpfeil S, Giebels C, Schafers HJ (2017) Two decades of experience with root remodeling and valve repair for bicuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 153(4):S65–s71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Schneider U, Hofmann C, Aicher D, Takahashi H, Miura Y, Schafers HJ (2017) Suture annuloplasty significantly improves the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 103(2):504–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lansac E, Di Centa I, Sleilaty G, Lejeune S, Berrebi A, Zacek P, Debauchez M (2017) Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 153(5):1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fattouch K, Moscarelli M, Castrovinci S, Murana G, Dioguardi P, Guccione F, Nasso G, Speziale G, Lancellotti P (2017) Mid-term results of bicuspid aortic valve repair guided by morphology and function assessment. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 25(1):83–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Flynn CD, Tian DH, Wilson-Smith A, David T, Matalanis G, Misfeld M, Mastrobuoni S, El Khoury G, Yan TD (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes in Marfan patients undergoing aortic root surgery by composite-valve graft or valve sparing root replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 6(6):570–581. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.11.06

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Tanaka H, Takahashi H, Inoue T, Matsueda T, Oda T, Abe N, Nomura Y, Gotake Y, Okita Y (2017) Which technique of cusp repair is durable in reimplantation procedure? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 52(1):112–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Keeling WB, Leshnower BG, Binongo J, Lasanajak Y, McPherson L, Chen EP (2017) Severity of preoperative aortic regurgitation does not impact valve durability of aortic valve repair following the David V valve sparing aortic root replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 103(3):756–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.07.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Urbanski PP, Jankulovski A, Doldurov K, Zhan X, Sodah A, Zacher M, Diegeler A (2018) Reconstructive aortic valve surgery in the elderly: techniques and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155(4):1414–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Goldstone AB, Chiu P, Baiocchi M, Lingala B, Patrick WL, Fischbein MP, Woo YJ (2017) Mechanical or biologic prostheses for aortic-valve and mitral-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 377(19):1847–1857. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Schnittman SR, Adams DH, Itagaki S, Toyoda N, Egorova NN, Chikwe J (2017) Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sondergaard L, Steinbruchel DA, Ihlemann N, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, Ngo AT, Olsen NT, Chang Y, Franzen OW, Engstrom T, Clemmensen P, Olsen PS, Thyregod HG (2016) Two-year outcomes in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis randomized to transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: the all-comers nordic aortic valve intervention randomized clinical trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.115.003665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gonzalez-Lopez D, Faerber G, Diab M, Amorim P, Zeynalov N, Doenst T (2017) Replica sizing strategy for aortic valve replacement improves haemodynamic outcome of the epic supra valve. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 25(4):509–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Rocha RV, Manlhiot C, Feindel CM, Yau TM, Mueller B, David TE, Ouzounian M (2017) Surgical enlargement of the aortic root does not increase the operative risk of aortic valve replacement. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.030525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Regueiro A, Linke A, Latib A, Ihlemann N, Urena M, Walther T, Husser O, Herrmann HC, Nombela-Franco L, Cheema AN, Le Breton H, Stortecky S, Kapadia S, Bartorelli AL, Sinning JM, Amat-Santos I, Munoz-Garcia A, Lerakis S, Gutierrez-Ibanes E, Abdel-Wahab M, Tchetche D, Testa L, Eltchaninoff H, Livi U, Castillo JC, Jilaihawi H, Webb JG, Barbanti M, Kodali S, de Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro HB, Miceli A, Fiorina C, Dato GM, Rosato F, Serra V, Masson JB, Wijeysundera HC, Mangione JA, Ferreira MC, Lima VC, Carvalho LA, Abizaid A, Marino MA, Esteves V, Andrea JC, Giannini F, Messika-Zeitoun D, Himbert D, Kim WK, Pellegrini C, Auffret V, Nietlispach F, Pilgrim T, Durand E, Lisko J, Makkar RR, Lemos PA, Leon MB, Puri R, San Roman A, Vahanian A, Sondergaard L, Mangner N, Rodes-Cabau J (2016) Association between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and subsequent infective endocarditis and in-hospital death. JAMA 316(10):1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Said SM, Abdelsattar ZM, Schaff HV, Greason KL, Daly RC, Pochettino A, Joyce LD, Dearani JA (2017) Outcomes of surgery for infective endocarditis: a single-centre experience of 801 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Diab M, Sponholz C, von Loeffelholz C, Scheffel P, Bauer M, Kortgen A, Lehmann T, Farber G, Pletz MW, Doenst T (2017) Impact of perioperative liver dysfunction on in-hospital mortality and long-term survival in infective endocarditis patients. Infection 45(6):857–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-017-1064-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Doenst T, Diab M, Sponholz C, Bauer M, Farber G (2017) The opportunities and limitations of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int 114(46):777–784. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0777

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Lamelas J, Mawad M, Williams R, Weiss UK, Zhang Q, LaPietra A (2017) Isolated and concomitant minimally invasive minithoracotomy aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Takagi H, Ando T, Umemoto T (2017) A review of comparative studies of MitraClip versus surgical repair for mitral regurgitation. Int J Cardiol 228:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kang DH, Heo R, Lee S, Baek S, Kim DH, Song JM, Song JK, Lee JW (2017) Initial surgery versus conservative management of symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation in the elderly. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Javadikasgari H, Gillinov AM, Idrees JJ, Mihaljevic T, Suri RM, Raza S, Houghtaling PL, Svensson LG, Navia JL, Mick SL, Desai MY, Sabik JF 3rd, Blackstone EH (2017) Valve repair is superior to replacement in most patients with coexisting degenerative mitral valve and coronary artery diseases. Ann Thorac Surg 103(6):1833–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Khera R, Pandey A, Koshy T, Ayers C, Nallamothu BK, Das SR, Drazner MH, Jessen ME, Kirtane AJ, Gardner TJ, de Lemos JA, Bhatt DL, Kumbhani DJ (2017) Role of hospital volumes in identifying low-performing and high-performing aortic and mitral valve surgical centers in the United States. JAMA Cardiol 2(12):1322–1331. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Chikwe J, Toyoda N, Anyanwu AC, Itagaki S, Egorova NN, Boateng P, El-Eshmawi A, Adams DH (2017) Relation of mitral valve surgery volume to repair rate, durability, and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Chowdhury UK, Rizvi A, Narang R, Seth S, Kalaivani M, Hasija S, Kumari L (2017) Mitral valve replacement using carpentier-edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in patients with rheumatic heart disease aged below 40 years: 17-year results. Heart Lung Circ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2017.05.147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Choi JW, Kim KH, Chang HW, Jang MJ, Kim SH, Yeom SY, Hwang HY (2017) Long-term results of annuloplasty in trivial-to-mild functional tricuspid regurgitation during mitral valve replacement: should we perform annuloplasty on the tricuspid valve or leave it alone? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. David TE, David CM, Fan CS, Manlhiot C (2017) Tricuspid regurgitation is uncommon after mitral valve repair for degenerative diseases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 154(1):110–122.e111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Pagnesi M, Montalto C, Mangieri A, Agricola E, Puri R, Chiarito M, Ancona MB, Regazzoli D, Testa L, De Bonis M, Moat NE, Rodes-Cabau J, Colombo A, Latib A (2017) Tricuspid annuloplasty versus a conservative approach in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation undergoing left-sided heart valve surgery: a study-level meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 240:138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Chang HW, Jeong DS, Cho YH, Sung K, Kim WS, Lee YT, Park PW (2017) Tricuspid valve replacement vs. repair in severe tricuspid regurgitation. Circ J 81(3):330–338. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ejiofor JI, Neely RC, Yammine M, McGurk S, Kaneko T, Leacche M, Cohn LH, Shekar PS (2017) Surgical outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve procedures: repair versus replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 6(3):214–222. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.05.02

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Farag M, Arif R, Sabashnikov A, Zeriouh M, Popov AF, Ruhparwar A, Schmack B, Dohmen PM, Szabo G, Karck M, Weymann A (2017) Repair or replacement for isolated tricuspid valve pathology? Insights from a surgical analysis on long-term survival. Med Sci Monit 23:1017–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Jang JY, Heo R, Lee S, Kim JB, Kim DH, Yun SC, Song JM, Song JK, Lee JW, Kang DH (2017) Comparison of results of tricuspid valve repair versus replacement for severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 119(6):905–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Rogers JG, Pagani FD, Tatooles AJ, Bhat G, Slaughter MS, Birks EJ, Boyce SW, Najjar SS, Jeevanandam V, Anderson AS, Gregoric ID, Mallidi H, Leadley K, Aaronson KD, Frazier OH, Milano CA (2017) Intrapericardial left ventricular assist device for advanced heart failure. N Engl J Med 376(5):451–460. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Uriel N, Colombo PC, Cleveland JC, Long JW, Salerno C, Goldstein DJ, Patel CB, Ewald GA, Tatooles AJ, Silvestry SC, John R, Caldeira C, Jeevanandam V, Boyle AJ, Sundareswaran KS, Sood P, Mehra MR (2017) Hemocompatibility-related outcomes in the MOMENTUM 3 trial at 6 months: a randomized controlled study of a fully magnetically levitated pump in advanced heart failure. Circulation 135(21):2003–2012. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.028303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Stehlik J, Estep JD, Selzman CH, Rogers JG, Spertus JA, Shah KB, Chuang J, Farrar DJ, Starling RC (2017) Patient-reported health-related quality of life is a predictor of outcomes in ambulatory heart failure patients treated with left ventricular assist device compared with medical management: results from the ROADMAP study (risk assessment and comparative effectiveness of left ventricular assist device and medical management). Circ Heart Fail. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.116.003910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Messer S, Page A, Axell R, Berman M, Hernandez-Sanchez J, Colah S, Parizkova B, Valchanov K, Dunning J, Pavlushkov E, Balasubramanian SK, Parameshwar J, Omar YA, Goddard M, Pettit S, Lewis C, Kydd A, Jenkins D, Watson CJ, Sudarshan C, Catarino P, Findlay M, Ali A, Tsui S, Large SR (2017) Outcome after heart transplantation from donation after circulatory-determined death donors. J Heart Lung Transplant 36(12):1311–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2017.10.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Benjamin Gloy for expert technical assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany

    Torsten Doenst, Hristo Kirov, Alexandros Moschovas, David Gonzalez-Lopez, Rauf Safarov, Mahmoud Diab, Steffen Bargenda & Gloria Faerber

Authors
  1. Torsten Doenst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hristo Kirov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexandros Moschovas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Gonzalez-Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rauf Safarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mahmoud Diab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Steffen Bargenda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gloria Faerber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Doenst.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doenst, T., Kirov, H., Moschovas, A. et al. Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 107, 1087–1102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1280-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1280-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation