Advertisement

Clinical Research in Cardiology

, Volume 107, Issue 8, pp 658–669 | Cite as

Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Marie-Isabel Murray
  • Ahran Arnold
  • Murad Younis
  • Swaroop Varghese
  • Andreas Michael Zeiher
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes of the treatment with cryoballoon (CB) compared to the treatment with traditional irrigated radiofrequency ablation (RF) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) and refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD).

Design

We conducted a systemic review to find and include more than two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with at least 20 patients in each of the CB and RF groups. Thereafter, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the treatment with CB and RF in primary outcomes including 1 year free from AF, complications and re-ablation procedures. Additionally, we evaluated procedure time and fluoroscopy duration in both groups. Risk of bias in the individual studies and across studies was assessed using Cochrane methods.

Data extraction and synthesis

Two reviewers extracted study data and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcome data were extracted from the time point 1 year after the procedure. The random-effects model was used to calculate the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval.

Data sources

Data sources utilized were PubMed and CENTRAL databases up to 16 June 2016.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

Included studies were RCTs in adults with pAF and refractory to AAD in which CB therapy, including 1st and 2nd generation CB, was compared to the traditional irrigated RF therapy. Clinical outcomes assessed in each RCT were 1 year AF-free survival, complication rates, re-ablations, fluoroscopy time and procedure time.

Results

The systematic review identified four randomized controlled trials that reported on comparative clinical outcomes involving 1284 patients. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that CB ablation had a non-significant higher success rate than RF therapy (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.72–1.77). However, our study showed a relatively higher rate of complications in the CB group (OR 1.20; 95% CI 0.58–2.52). Furthermore, CB treatment was associated with a non-significant, shorter procedure time and marginally prolonged fluoroscopy time in comparison to RF treatment.

Conclusion

Our systemic review and meta-analysis revealed further evidence that cryoballoon ablation is an equally effective alternative procedure to the standard radiofrequency treatment with a slightly, non-significant higher freedom from AF 1 year after the ablation and a shorter procedure time.

Keywords

Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Comparison cryoballoon and radiofrequency Meta-analysis including RCTs 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

392_2018_1232_MOESM1_ESM.docx (854 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 854 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Andrade JG, Deyell MW, Badra M, Champagne J, Dubuc M, Leong-Sit P, Macle L, Novak P, Roux JF, Sapp J, Tang A, Verma A, Wells GA, Khairy P (2017) Randomised clinical trial of cryoballoon versus irrigated radio frequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation—the effect of double short versus standard exposure cryoablation duration during pulmonary vein isolation (CIRCA-DOSE): methods and rationale. BMJ Open 7(10):e017970PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aryana A, Bowers M, O’Neill P (2015) Ablation of atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive review. JAFIB 8(2):39–50Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bothwell L, Greene J, Podolsky S, Jones D (2016) Assessing the gold standard—lessons from the history of RCTs. N Engl J Med 374:2175–2218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowden J, Tierney JF, Copas AJ, Burdett S (2011) Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalized Q statistics. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calkins H, Reynolds MR, Spector P, Sondhi M, Xu Y, Martin A, Williams CJ, Sledge I (2009) Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2(4):349–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D (2012) 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace 14(4):528–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chun KRJ, Schmidt B, Metzner A, Tilz R, Zerm T, Köster I, Fürnkranz A, Koektuerk B, Konstantinidou M, Antz M, Ouyang F, Kuck KH (2009) The ‘single big cryoballoon’ technique for acute pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective observational single centre study. Eur Heart J 30:699–709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chun KR, Fürnkranz A, Köster I, Metzner A, Tönnis T, Wohlmuth P, Wissner E, Schmidt B, Ouyang F, Kuck KH (2012) Two versus one repeat freeze-thaw cycle(s) after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: the alster extra pilot study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23(8):814–819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S, Bae H, Gøtzsche P (2010) Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 341:c3920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Defaye P, Kane A, Jacon P, Mondesert B (2010) Cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation: is it better tolerated than radiofrequency? Retrospective study comparing the use of analgesia and sedation in both ablation techniques. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 103(6–7):388–393Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Di Giovanni G, Wauters K, Chierchia GB, Sieira J, Levinstein M, Conte G, de Asmundis C, Baltogiannis G, Saitoh Y, Ciconte G, Julia J, Mugnai G, Irfan G, Brugada P (2014) One-year follow-up after single procedure cryoballoon ablation: a comparison between the first and second generation balloon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25(8):834–839CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Dugo D, Perotta L, Gunawardene M, Schulte-Hahn B, Nowak B, Schmidt B, Chun J (2014) Improved 1-year clinical success rate of pulmonary vein isolation with the second-generation cryoballoon in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25(8):840–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herrera Siklódy C, Arentz T, Minners J, Jesel L, Stratz C, Valina CM, Weber R, Kalusche D, Toti F, Morel O, Trenk D (2012) Cellular damage, platelet activation, and inflammatory response after pulmonary vein isolation: a randomized study comparing radiofrequency ablation with cryoablation. Heart Rhythm 9(2):189 – 96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Higgins J, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane collaboration. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed May 2016
  15. 15.
    Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunter RJ, Baker V, Finlay MC, Duncan ER, Lovell MJ, Tayebjee MH, Ullah W, Siddiqui MS, McLEAN A, Richmond L, Kirkby C, Ginks MR, Dhinoja M, Sporton S, Earley MJ, Schilling RJ (2015) Point-by-point radiofrequency ablation versus the cryoballoon or a novel combined approach: a randomized trial comparing 3 methods of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (the cryo versus RF trial). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26(12):1307–1314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jarman JWE, Panikker S, Das M et al (2015) Relationship between contact force sensing technology and medium-term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter study of 600 patients.” J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26(4):378–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kardos A, Kis Z, Som Z, Nagy Z, Foldesi C (2016) Two-year follow-up after contact force sensing radiofrequency catheter and second-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a comparative single centre study. Biomed Res Int 2016:6495753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koller ML, Schumacher B (2009) Cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: bigger is better and simpler is better. Eur Heart J 30(6):636–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, Albenque JP (2016) Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 9(23):2235–2245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu J, Kaufmann J, Kriatselis C, Fleck E, Gerds-Li JH (2015) Second generation of cryoballoons can improve efficiency of cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 38(1):129–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu X, Chen C, Gao X, Xu Y (2016) Safety and efficacy of different catheter ablations for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 39(8):883–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luik A, Radzewitz A, Kieser M, Walter M, Bramlage P, Hörmann P, Schmidt K, Horn N, Brinkmeier-Theofanopoulou M, Kunzmann K, Riexinger T, Schymik G, Merkel M, Schmitt C (2015) Cryoballoon versus open irrigated radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority FreezeAF study. Circulation 132(14):1311–1319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marijon E, Fazaa S, Narayanan K, Guy-Moyat B, Bouzeman A, Providencia R, Treguer F, Combes N, Bortone A, Boveda S, Combes S, Albenque JP (2014) Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25(2):130–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meldrum M (2000) A brief history of the randomized controlled trial: from oranges and lemons to the gold standard. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 14(4):745–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Metzner A, Heeger CH, Wohlmuth P, Reißmann B, Rillig A, Tilz RR, Mathew S, Lemes C, Deiß S, Maurer T, Saguner A, Ouyang F, Kuck KH, Wißner E (2016) Two-year outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon: lessons from the bonus freeze protocol. Clin Res Cardiol 105(1):72 – 8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff1 J, Altman D (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009:339Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mugnai G, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C, Sieira-Moret J, Conte G, Capulzini L, Wauters K, Rodriguez-Mañero M, Di Giovanni G, Baltogiannis G, Ciconte G, Saitoh Y, Juliá J, Brugada P (2014) Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon versus conventional radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 113(9):1509–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, Wilber DJ, Lindsay BD, McElderry HT, Kantipudi C, Mansour MC, Melby DP, Packer DL, Nakagawa H, Zhang B, Stagg RB, Boo LM, Marchlinski FE (2014) Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 19(7):647–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Omran H, Gutleben KJ, Molatta S, Fischbach T, Wellmann B, Horstkotte D, Körber B, Nölker G (2017) Second generation cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 107(2):182–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pérez-Castellano N, Fernández-Cavazos R, Moreno J, Cañadas V, Conde A, González-Ferrer JJ, Macaya C, Pérez-Villacastín J (2014) The COR trial: a randomized study with continuous rhythm monitoring to compare the efficacy of cryoenergy and radiofrequency for pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm 11(1):8–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reynolds MR, Zimetbaum P, Josephson ME, Ellis E, Danilov T, Cohen DJ (2009) Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2(4):362–369CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sherman DG, Kim SG, Boop BS, Corley SD, Dimarco JP, Hart RG, Haywood LJ, Hoyte K, Kaufman ES, Kim MH, Nasco E, Waldo AL (2005) Occurrence and characteristics of stroke events in the atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of sinus rhythm management (AFFIRM) study. Arch Intern Med 165(10):1185–1191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Squara F, Zhao A, Marijon E, Latcu DG, Providencia R, Di Giovanni G, Jauvert G, Jourda F, Chierchia GB, De Asmundis C, Ciconte G, Alonso C, Grimard C, Boveda S, Cauchemez B, Saoudi N, Brugada P, Albenque JP, Thomas O (2015) Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation. Europace 17(5):718–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wasserlauf J, Pelchovitz DJ, Rhyner J, Verma N, Bohn M, Li Z, Arora R, Chicos AB, Goldberger JJ, Kim SS, Lin AC, Knight BP, Passman RS (2015) Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 38(4):483–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, De Paola A, Marchlinski F, Natale A, Macle L, Daoud EG, Calkins H, Hall B, Reddy V, Augello G, Reynolds MR, Vinekar C, Liu CY, Berry SM, Berry DA (2010) Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 303(4):333–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB (1991) Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke 22(8):983–988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xu J, Huang Y, Cai H, Qi Y, Jia N, Shen W, Lin J, Peng F, Niu W (2014) Is cryoballoon ablation preferable to radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation? A meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(2):e90323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CardiologyUniversity Hospital FrankfurtFrankfurt-am MainGermany
  2. 2.Department of Health PolicyLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  3. 3.International Centre for Circulatory Health, Hammersmith HospitalImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations