Abstract
Purpose
The size of the ventricles of the heart is important to establish during the clinical echocardiographic examination. Due to the complex anatomy of the right ventricle, it is difficult to measure its size at times. One of the most frequently used ways is to measure the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT1), probably due to its good reproducibility. However, in the literature different ways are described to measure RVOT1, both at different sites and using different methods such as M-mode and 2D. The first aim of the present study was to exam if there is a significant difference in the outcome of RVOT1 using different sites and methods to measure it. The second aim was to study if there is a significant difference between the usually preferred left lateral decubitus position during the echocardiographic examination and the supine decubitus position, which the echocardiographer sometimes can be compelled to use if the patient is unable to lie in the left lateral decubitus position.
Methods
Twenty-seven healthy subjects were included and examined by echocardiography. RVOT1 was measured at different sites using different methods; first with the subject in the left lateral decubitus position and then repeating the same measurements with the subject in the supine decubitus position.
Results
Comparing the RVOT1 measured at different sites and with different methods showed an overall significant difference (p < 0.001). Also when comparing the different body positions, there was an overall significant difference (p = 0.001).
Conclusions
When comparing RVOT1 of the same patient or subject over time, the results from the present study indicate that the same site, method and body position should be used.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aurigemma GP, Douglas PS, Gaasch WH (2002) Quantitative evaluation of left ventricular structure, wall stress and systolic function. In: Otto C (ed) The practice of clinical echocardiography, 2nd edn. W.B. Saunders company, Philadelphia, p 65
Francés RJ (2006) Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. A review and update. Int J Cardiol 110:279–287
Wong SP, Otto CM (2002) Echocardiographic findings in acute and chronic pulmonary disease. In: Otto C (ed) The practice of clinical echocardiography, 2nd edn. W.B. Saunders company, Philadelphia, p 741
Lauschke J, Maisch B (2009) Athlete′s heart or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy? Clin Res Cardiol 98:80–88
Norgård G, Vik-Mo H (1992) Effects of respiration on right ventricular size and function: an echocardiographic study. Pediatr Cardiol 13:136–140
Henriksen E, Landelius J, Kangro T, Jonason T, Hedberg P, Wesslén L, Rosander CN, Rolf C, Ringqvist I, Friman G (1999) An echocardiographic study of the right and left ventricular adaptation to physical exercise in elite female orienteers. Eur Heart J 20:309–316
Lindqvist P, Henein M, Kazzam E (2003) Right ventricular outflow-tract fractional shortening: an applicable measure of right ventricular systolic function. Eur J Echocardiogr 4:29–35
Otto C (2004) Left and right ventricular systolic function. In: Otto C (ed) Textbook of clinical echocardiography, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 151–152
Feigenbaum H, Armstrong W, Ryan T (2005) Left atrium, right atrium and right ventricle. In: Feigenbaum H (ed) Echocardiography, 6th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 202–204
Lang RM, Bierig M et al (2005) Recommendations of chamber quantification: a report from the American society of echocardiography’s guidelines and standards committee and the chamber quantification group, developed in conjunction with the European association of echocardiography, a branch of the European society of cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463
Lindqvist P, Calcutteea A, Henein M (2008) Echocardiography on the assessment of right heart function. Eur J Echocardiogr 9:225–234
Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A (1978) Recommendations regarding quantitation in m-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 6:1072–1083
Baker BJ, Scovil JA, Kane JJ, Murphy ML (1983) Echocardiographic detection of right ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 105:611–614
Foale R, Nihoyannopoulos P, McKenna W, Klienebenne A, Nadazdin A, Rowland E, Smith G (1986) Echocardiographic measurement of the normal adult right ventricle. Br Heart J 56:33–44
Feigenbaum H (ed) (1994) Echocardiography, 5th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 88
Dunn G (1989) Design and analysis of reliability studies. Oxford University Press, New York
Acknowledgments
We gratefully thank statistician Anders Magnuson, Units of Statistics and Epidemiology, Centre for Clinical Research, Örebro University Hospital, for his statistical advice and Hubert Bouma, Canada, for correcting the English language in the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loiske, K., Hammar, S. & Emilsson, K. Echocardiographic measurements of the right ventricle: right ventricular outflow tract 1. Clin Res Cardiol 99, 429–435 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0137-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0137-7