Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The basic pacing rate in CRT patients: the higher the better?

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To maximize the hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), echocardiographic AV interval optimization is routinely performed, complemented by VV interval optimization especially in non-responders. Programming of the basic pacing rate, however, is largely empirical in these patients. Therefore, the present study aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of basic pacing rate on hemodynamic parameters in CRT patients with sinus bradycardia.

Methods and results

We included 70 consecutive patients with moderate to severe heart failure, LV ejection fraction ≤35%, left bundle branch block or a QRS duration >120 ms combined with echocardiographic evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony. All patients were on optimal heart failure medication, with CRT-ICD devices implanted at least 6 months before inclusion into the study. All patients were in sinus rhythm with a spontaneous heart rate <40 bpm. In all patients, cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) were determined using electrical velocimetry (EV) (Aesculon, Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany). EV provides a new algorithm to calculate CO based on variations in thoracic electrical bioimpedance, which has been recently validated. Hemodynamic measurements were performed at four different pacing rates ranging from 40 to 70 bpm. A stepwise increase in CO was encountered with increasing heart rates, reaching statistical significance when comparing 70 with 40 bpm. SV remained unchanged throughout all pacing rates.

Conclusions

In the range between 40 and 70 bpm, an increase in basic pacing rate enhances CO without reducing SV. According to this pilot study, a basic pacing rate between 60 and 70 bpm would appear reasonable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, Kocovic DZ, Packer M, Clavell AL, Hayes DL, Ellestad M, Trupp RJ, Underwood J, Pickering F, Truex C, McAtee P, Messenger J; MIRACLE Study Group (2002) Multicenter insync randomized clinical evaluation: cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 346:1845–1853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham WT, Hayes DL (2003) Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure. Circulation 108:2596–2603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M, Sack S, Vogt J, Bakker P, Klein H, Kramer A, Ding J, Salo R, Tockman B, Pochet T, Spinelli J (1999) Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure: The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure Study Group: The Guidant Congestive Heart Failure Research Group. Circulation 99:2993–3001

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck C, Osthaus A, Betram H, Suntordjo S, Wessel A (2006) Nicht-invasive Herzzeit-Volumen-Messung bei Kindern mit angeborenen Herzfehlern. Clin Res Cardiol 95(Suppl 5):A1298

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bernheim A, Ammann P, Sticherling C, Burger P, Schaer B, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Eckstein J, Kiencke S, Kaiser C, Linka A, Buser P, Pfisterer M, Osswald S (2005) Right atrial pacing impairs cardiac function during resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein DP, Osypka (2003) MJ apparatus and method determining an approximation of the stroke volume and the cardiac output of the heart. US Patent 6,511,438 B2, 28 Jan 2003

  7. Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, Walker S, Varma C, Linde C, Garrigue S, Kappenberger L, Haywood GA, Santini M, Bailleul C, Daubert JC (2001) Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 344:873–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gauri AJ, Raxwal VK, Roux L, Fearon WF, Froehlicher VF (2001) Effects of chronotropic incompetence and beta-blocker use on the exercise treadmill test in men. Am Heart J 142:136–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kindermann M, Frohlig G, Doerr T, Schieffer H (1997) Optimizing the AV delay in DDD pacemaker patients with high degree AV block: mitral valve Doppler versus impedance cardiography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20:2453–2462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lechat P, Hulot JS, Escolano S, Mallet A, Leizorovicz A, Wehrlen-Grandjean M, Pochmalicki G, Dargie H (2001) Heart rate and cardiac rhythm relationships with bisoprolol benefit in chronic heart failure in CIBIS II trial. Circulation 103:1428–1433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Donnell D, Nadurata V, Hamer A, Kertes P, Mohammed W (2005) Long-term variations in optimal programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28(Supp1):24–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt G, Theilmeier G, Van Aken H, Korsmeier P, Wirtz SP, Berendes E, Hoffmeier A, Meissner A (2005) Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth 95:603–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik Voss MD.

Additional information

Dr. F. Voss and Dr. R. Becker contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voss, F., Becker, R., Hauck, M. et al. The basic pacing rate in CRT patients: the higher the better?. Clin Res Cardiol 98, 219–223 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-009-0745-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-009-0745-2

Keywords

Navigation