Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positionspapier zur Indikation und Durchführung der interventionellen Behandlung extrakranieller Karotisstenosen

  • LEITLINIEN/KOMMENTARE/POSITIONSPAPIERE
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Heuschmann PU (2002) Inzidenz, Ätiologie und Langzeitprognose des Schlaganfalls. Fortschr Neurol Psychat 70:657–662

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eastcott HH, Pickering GW, Rob CG (1954) Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attackes of hemiplegia. Lancet 267:994–996

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group (1998) Endarterectomy for moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis; final results from MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial. Lancet 351:1379–1387

    Google Scholar 

  4. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaberators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Eng J Med 325:445–453

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mayberg MR, Wilson E, Yatsu F et al (1991) Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. JAMA 266:3289–3294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273:1421–1428

    Google Scholar 

  7. MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group (2004) Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1491–1502

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA et al (2003) Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 361:107–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD et al (1998) Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA 279:1278–1281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore WS, Barnett HJM, Beebe HG et al (1995) Guidelines for Carotid Endarterectomy. A Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement From the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 91:566–579

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mathias K (1977) Ein neuartiges Kathetersystem zur perkutanen transluminalen Angioplastie von Karotisstenosen. Fortschr Med 95:1007–1011

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mathias K, Mittermayer C, Ensinger H et al (1980) Perkutane Katheterdilatation von Karotisstenosen. RöFo 133:258–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mathias K (1981) Perkutane transluminale Katheterbehandlung supraaortaler Arterienobstruktionen. Angio 3:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ohki, T (2003) The dark side of embolic protection devices. Endovascular Today, pp 54–60

  15. Henry M, Amor M, Henry I (1998) Angioplasty and stenting of the external carotid arteries. J Endovasc Surg 5:293–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roubin GS, Yadav S, Iyer SS et al (1996) Carotid stent-supported angioplasty: a neurovascular intervention to prevent stroke. Am J Cardiol 78(3A):8–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CT (1996) A systematic review of the risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 27:260–265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tübler T, Schluter M, Dirsch O et al (2001) Balloon–protected carotid artery stenting; relationship of periprocedural neurological complications with size of particulate debris. Circulation 104:2791–2796

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reimers B, Corvaja N, Moshiri S et al (2001) Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting. Circulation 104:12–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mudra H, Ziegler M, Haufe MC et al (2004) Perkutane Karotisangioplastie mit Stentimplantation und Embolieprotektion. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 128:790–796

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH (2003) Updated Review of the Global Carotid Artery Stent Registry. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 60:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  22. Theiss W, Hermanek P, Mathias K et al (2004) Pro-CAS. A Prospective Registry of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting. Stroke 35:2134–2139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zahn R, Roth E, Ischinger T et al (2005) Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice. Results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)—registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Z Kardiol 94:163–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reimers B, Schlüter M, Castriota F et al (2004) Routine Use of Cerebral Protection during Carotid Artery Stenting: Results of a Multicenter Registry of 753 Patients. Am J Med 116:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wholey M (2004) The ARCHER Trials. Vortrag auf dem ISET-Kongress in Miami, USA

  26. Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF et al (2005) Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 26:804–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathur A, Dorros G, Iyer SS et al (1997) Palmaz Stent Compression in Patients Following Carotid Artery Stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 41:137–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected Carotid-Artery Stenting versus Endarterectomy in High-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Naylor AR, Bolia A, Abbott RJ et al (1998) Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. J Vasc Surg 28:326–334

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alberts MJ (2001) Results of a multi-center prospective randomized trial of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 32:325d (Abstrakt)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brown MM, Rogers J, Blank JM for the CAVATAS investigators (2001) Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS); a randomized trial. Lancet 357:1729–1737

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hobson RW 2nd, Howard VJ, Roubin GS et al (2004) Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenerians. 30-day stroke and death rate in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg 40:1106–1111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bergeron P, Roux M, Khanoyan P et al (2005) Long-term results of carotid stenting are competitive with surgery. J Vasc Surg 41:213–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Roubin GS, New G, Iyer SS et al (2001) Immediate and Late Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis. A 5-Year Prospective Analysis. Circulation 103:532–537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mathias K (2004) Endovaskuläre Behandlung der Karotisstenose. J Kardiol 11:217–224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 2. Medizinische Abteilung (Schwerpunkte Kardiologie, Pulmunologie und internistische Intensivmedizin), Städtisches Klinikum München GmbH, Krankenhaus München-Neuperlach, Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51, 81737, München

    H. Mudra

Authors
  1. H. Mudra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Büchele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Mathias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Schuler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Sievert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. W. Theiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Mudra.

Additional information

Herausgegeben vom Vorstand der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie—Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. Bearbeitet im Auftrag der Kommission für Klinische Kardiologie G. Ertl, D. Andresen, M. Böhm, M. Borggrefe, J. Brachmann, F. de Haan, A. Osterspey, S. Silber, H. J. Trappe außerdem G. Arnold, H. M. Hoffmeister, E. Fleck von H. Mudra, W. Büchele, K. Mathias, G. Schuler, H. Sievert, W. Theiss

In Zusammenarbeit mit der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Angiologie.

Dieses Positionspapier ist eine Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie—Herz- und Kreislaufforschung (DGK), die den gegenwärtigen Erkenntnisstand wiedergibt und allen Ärzten und ihren Patienten die Entscheidungsfindung erleichtern soll. Ein Positionspapier ersetzt nicht die ärztliche Evaluation des individuellen Patienten und die Anpassung der Diagnostik und Therapie an dessen spezifische Situation. In Positionspapieren wird der Stellenwert eines diagnostischen und/oder therapeutischen Verfahrens beurteilt und es werden Empfehlungen für die tägliche Praxis abgegeben. Es werden bisher publizierte, relevante Studien herangezogen, gelöste Fragen beantwortet und ungelöste aufgezeigt. Es wird eine Empfehlung abgegeben, für welche Patienten ein neu vorgestelltes diagnostisches und/oder therapeutisches Verfahren in Frage kommt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mudra, H., Büchele, W., Mathias, K. et al. Positionspapier zur Indikation und Durchführung der interventionellen Behandlung extrakranieller Karotisstenosen. Clin Res Cardiol 95 (Suppl 4), 85–91 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-2004-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-2004-0

Search

Navigation