Skip to main content
Log in

Reversible cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after stenting of the carotid artery—Two case reports

  • CASE REPORT
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Hyperperfusion syndrome can complicate carotid revascularization, be it endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting (CAS). Although extensive effort has been devoted to reducing the incidence of ischemic stroke complicating CAS, little is known about the incidence, etiology, and prevention strategies for hyperperfusion following CAS. We report two cases (female patients 72 and 81 years) presenting severe internal carotid stenosis (> 90%), who underwent presurgical and therapeutic intervention with CAS. Both patients developed hyperperfusion symptoms at 2 hours and at 30 minutes, respectively, following stenting, in both cases unilateral hyperperfusion was CCT confirmed. Case 1 was presenting with acute edema of the right hemisphere, case 2 with distended focal edema (left fronto–temporoparietally). Hyperperfusion syndrome and neurological symptoms retroceded in both cases (conservative therapy) and both patients returned to full activity (case 2 within 48 hours).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abou-Chebl A, Yadav JS, Reginelli JP, Bajzer C, Bhatt D, Krieger DW (2004) Intracranial hemorrhage and hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid artery stenting: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(9):1596–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ascher E, Markevich N, Schutzer RW, Kallakuri S, Jacob T, Hingorani AP (2003) Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy: predictive factors and hemodynamic changes. J Vasc Surg 37(4):769–777

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beebe HG, Archie JP, Baker WH, Bames RW, Becker GJ, Bernstein EF, Brener B, Clagett GP, Clowes AW, Cooke JP (1996) Concern about safety of carotid angioplasty. Stroke 27:197–198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Breen JC, Caplan LR, DeWitt LD, Belkin M, Mackey WC, O’Donnell TP (1996) Brain edema after carotid surgery. Neurology 46:175–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown MM, Rogers J, Bland JM (2001) Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 357:1729–1737

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coutts SB, Hill MD, Hu WY (2003) Hyperperfusion syndrome: toward a stricter definition. Neurosurgery 53 (5):1053–1060

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Bargo MD, Marti-Fabregas J, Belvis R, Castano C, Cocho D, Marin B, Marti-Vilalta JL (2004) Intracerebral haemorrhage by cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid angioplasty in a tandem lesion. A case report. Neurologia 19(5):273–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gossetti B, Martinelli O, Guerricchio R, lrace L, Benedetti-Valentini F (1997) Transcranial Doppler in 178 patients before, during, and after carotid endarterectomy. J Neuroimaging 7(4):213–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison PB, Wong MJ, Belzberg A, Holden J (1991) Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy. CT changes. Neuroradiology 33(2):106–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartmann M, Weber R, Zoubaa S, Schranz C, Knauth M (2004) Fatal subarachnoid hemorrhage after carotid stenting. J Neuroradiol 31(1):63–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hobson RW 2nd, Brott T, Ferguson R, Roubin G, Moore W, Kuntz R, Howard G, Ferguson I (1997) CREST: Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stent trial. Cardiovasc Surg 5:457–458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hosoda K, Kawaguchi T, Ishii K, Minoshima S, Shibata Y, Iwakura M, Ishiguro S, Kohmura E (2003) Prediction of hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy by brain SPECT analysis with semiquantitative statistical mapping method. Stroke 34(5):1187–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kasirajan K, Matteson B, Marek JM, Langsfeld M (2003) Comparison of nonneurological events in high-risk patients treated by carotid angioplasty versus endarterectomy. Am J Surg 185(4):301–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathias K, Jäger H, Henning S, Gissler HM (2001) Endoluminal treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis. World J Surg 25:328–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyers PM, Higashida RT, Phatouros CC, Malek AM, Lempert TE, Dowd CF, Halbach VV (2000) Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after percutaneous transluminal stenting of the craniocervical arteries. Neurosurgery 47(2):335–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogasawara K, Yukawa H, Kobayashi M, Mikami C, Konno H, Terasaki K, Inoue T, Ogawa A (2003) Prediction and monitoring of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy by using single-photon emission computerized tomography scanning. J Neurosurg 99(3):504–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogasawara K, Konno H, Yukawa H, Endo H, Inoue T, Ogawa A (2003) Transcranial regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring during carotid endarterectomy as a predictor of postoperative hyperperfusion. Neurosurgery 53(2):309–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Penn AA, Schomer DF, Steinberg CK (1995) Imaging studies of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy: Case report. J Neurosurg 83:133–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piepgras DC, Morgan MK, Sundt TM Jr, Yanagihara T, Mussman (1988) Intracerebral hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 68:532– 536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reifart N (2000) Carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in cardiological patients with increased surgical risk. Z Kardiol 89(suppl 8):27–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reigel MM, Hollier LH, Sundt TM Jr, Piepgras DC, Sharbrough FW, Cherry KJ (1987) Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome: a cause of neurologic dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 5:628–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schröder J, Olmor G (2000) Open carotid endarterectomy: the classical operation method, experimental carotid stenting. Z Kardiol 89(suppl 8):14–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schroeder T, Sillesen H, Boesen J, Laursen H, Sorensen P (1987) Intracerebral haemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Surg 1:51–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schroeder T, Sillesen H, Sorensen O, Engell HC (1987) Cerebral hyperperfusion following carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 66:824–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Solomon RA, Loftus CM, Quest DO, Correll JW (1986) Incidence and etiology of intracerebral hemorrhage following carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 64:29–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sundt TM Jr, Sharbrough FW, Piepgras DC, Keams TP, Messick JM Jr, O’Fallon WM (1981) Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electro encephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy: with results of surgery and hemodynamics of cerebral ischemia. Mayo Clin Proc 56:533–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK, Whitlow P, Strickmn NE, Jaff MR, Popma JJ, Snead DB, Cutlip DE, Firth BG, Ouriel K; Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Enarterectomy Investigators (2004) Protected carotidarterty stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl Med 351:1493–1501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Günter Pilz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pilz, G., Klos, M., Bernhardt, P. et al. Reversible cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after stenting of the carotid artery—Two case reports. Clin Res Cardiol 95, 186–191 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0347-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0347-1

Key words

Navigation