Summary
Aims
The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of carotid-artery stenting (CAS) in high-risk patients in routine clinical settings while excluding the impact of multiple operators and the learning curve of individual operators on the outcome, and to determine the impact of individual risk factors, including vascular multimorbidity, on the outcome.
Methods and results
A total of 143 consecutive patients, 100 (69.9%) males and 43 (30.1%) females, mean age 68.7±8 years treated between February 1999 and May 2004 in the Heart Centre Coswig by a single operator for a symptomatic (n=37) and asymptomatic (n=106) on average greater than 70% (82.3±10.7%) or 80% (85.0±9.1%) NASCET carotid-artery stenosis, respectively, were studied. At least one NASCET exclusion criteria was present in 140 patients (97.9%), and vascular multimorbidity was present in 94 (65.7%) patients. In 28 (19.6%) patients there was a complete occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery and in 12 (8.4%) patients the procedure was performed prior to emergency coronary bypass surgery. In all, 47 (32.9%) procedures were performed without and 96 (67.1%) were performed with thromboembolic protection. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined neurological complications, TIA, PRIND and stroke, occurred in 5 (3.5%) patients, of which 3 (2.1%) were PRIND and 2 (1.4%) were strokes. The neurological complications were more frequent and more severe in symptomatic patients compared to asymptomatic patients (PRIND 2.7% vs 1.9%; stroke 0% vs 5.4%). In patients in whom thromboembolic protection was used, the rate of neurological complications was lower compared to those without protection (PRIND 1.0% vs 4.3%; stroke 1.0% vs. 2.1%). There was no death related to the procedure. Neurological complications were more frequent and more severe in patients with vascular multimorbidity compared to those with an isolated carotid-artery stenosis (4.2% vs 2.0%). The rate of neurological complications was similar in type II diabetics and nondiabetics (2.9% vs 4.1%). In 4.2%, minor complications related to the arterial puncture site were observed (3.5% hematoma not requiring blood transfusion, 0.7% pseudoaneurysm). At follow-up after a minimum of 6 months, 9 (6.3%) patients had died, the majority of whom had died of cardiovascular disease (3.5%).
Conclusions
CAS can be performed with an acceptable risk in high-risk patients in routine clinical settings when it is performed by an experienced operator. The use of thromboembolic protection devices reduces the risk of neurological complications. Presence of vascular multimorbidity, but not diabetes, appears to increase the risk of all causes and of neurological complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yadav J S et al (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501
Mathias K, Jäger H, Gißler HM (2000) Die endoluminale Therapie der Carotisstenose. Z Kardiol 89(Suppl 8):VIII/19–VIII/26
CAVATAS investigators (2001) Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 37:1729–1737
Brooks WH, McClure RR, Jones MR et al (2001) Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: randomized trial in a community hospital. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1589–1595
Shawl F, Kadro W, Domanski MJ et al (2000) Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high risk patiens. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1721–1728
Mathur A, Roubin GS, Iyer SS et al (1998) Predictors of stroke complicating carotid artery stenting. Circulation 97:1239–1245
Lovett JK, Gallagher PJ, Hands LJ et al (2004) Histological correlates of carotid surface morphology on lumen contrast imaging Circulation 110:2190–2197
Biasi GM, Fronio A, Diethrich EB et al (2004) Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting; The imaging in carotid angioplasty and risk of stroke (ICAROS) study Circulation 110:756–762
Spagnoli LC, Mauriello A, Sangiorgi G et al (2004) Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke JAMA 292:1845–1852
Kastrup A, Gröschel K, Krapf et al (2003) Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices. A systematic review of literature Stroke 34:813–819
Ahmadi R, Willfort A, Lang W et al (2001) Carotid artery stenting: effect of learning curve and intermediate-term morphological outcome J Endovasc Ther 8:539–546
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) Benefical effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445–453
Lanzer P (2003) Vascular multimorbidity in patients with a documented coronary artery disease Z Kardiol 92:650–659
Tübler T, Schlüter M, Dirsch O et al (2001) Balloon-protected carotid artery stenting; Relationship of periprocedural neurological complications with the size of particulate debris Circulation 104:2791–2796
Roubin GS, New G, Iyer SS et al (2001) Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation 103:532–537
Minar E, Ahmadi R (2003) Erfahrungen mit der endovaskulären Therapie der Karotisstenose J Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr 4(1):27–32
Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Vitek JJ et al (2001) Effect of the distal-balloon protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting Circulation 104:1999–2004
Zahn R, Mark B, Nidermaier N et al (2004) Embolic protection devices for the carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection? E Heart J 25:1550–1558
Whitlow PL, Lylyk P, Londero H et al (2002) Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system. Stroke 33:1308–1314
Lanzer P, Zuehlke H, Jehle P, Silber R-E (2004) Cardiovascular multimorbidity, emerging coalescence of the integrated panvascular approach Z Kardiol 93:259–265
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Grant 2003/2004 Bristol-Myer-Squibb Sapporobogen 8, Munich, Germany
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lanzer, P., Weser, R. & Prettin, C. Carotid-artery stenting in a high-risk patient population—. Clin Res Cardiol 95, 4–12 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0313-y
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0313-y