Skip to main content
Log in

Acute and long-term outcome after coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary interventions

Akut- und Langzeitergebnisse nach Koronarperforation im Rahmen perkutaner Katheterinterventionen

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Kardiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung.

Hintergrund:

Die Koronarperforation ist eine seltene, aber schwerwiegende Komplikation perkutaner Katheterinterventionen.

Methoden:

Wir analysierten die Datenbank unseres Herzkatheterlabors hinsichtlich des Auftretens von Koronarperforationen während perkutaner Katheterinterventionen. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Mechanismen der Perforation, des Management der Komplikation und des klinischen Ausgangs wurden die Patientenakten, Katheterberichte und Koronarangiogramme der Patienten mit Koronarperforation analysiert.

Ergebnisse:

Im Zeitraum von 01/1998 bis 12/2003 wurden 6433 Koronarinterventionen durchgeführt. Dabei kam es bei insgesamt 19 (0,3%) Patienten zu einer Koronarperforation (mittleres Alter: 66±8 Jahre, 13 Männer). Bei 12/19 (63%) Patienten trat die Perforation im Rahmen von Rekanalisationen chronischer Totalverschlüsse auf. Bei 18/19 Patienten wurden eine interventionelle Behandlungsstrategie angestrebt: 2 der 19 (11%) Patienten wurden konservativ behandelt (Antagonisieren der Heparin-induzierten Antikoagulation). Längerdauernde Balloninsufflationen im perforierten Gefäßsegment wurde bei 10/19 (53%) Patienten angewandt. Bei 6/19 (32%) Patienten wurde eine Stentimplantation durchgeführt, um die Perforationsstelle abzudichten (5/6 erhielten einen membran-beschichteten Stent-Graft). Drei (16%) Patienten entwickelten eine akute Pericardtamponade und 2 (11%) Patienten wurden einer notfallmäßigen Bypassoperation unterzogen. Insgesamt 2 (11%) Patienten verstarben kurzfristig nach dem Eingriff.

Schlussfolgerung:

Die Koronarperforation ist eine seltene, mit erheblicher Morbidität und Mortalität behaftete Komplikation perkutaner Koronarinterventionen. Eine interventionelle Behandlung ist in den meisten Fällen erfolgreich durchführbar und kann oft einen notfallmäßigen thoraxchirurgischen Eingriff verhindern.

Summary.

Background;

Coronary artery perforation is a rare but serious complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

Methods:

We reviewed our database for cases of overt coronary perforation during PCI procedures. Hospital charts, procedural reports, and coronary angiograms of these patients were reviewed, with particular emphasis on mechanisms of perforation, management of the complication, and clinical outcome.

Results:

Between 01/1998 and 12/2003, a total of 19 cases (mean age: 66±8 years, 13 male) of coronary perforation occurred during 6433 PCI procedures performed within this period (incidence: 0.3%). In 12/19 (63%) cases, perforation occurred during recanalisation procedures of chronic total occlusions of coronary arteries. In all but one patient, non-surgical management was attempted: 2 out of 19 (11%) patients were treated conservatively by reversal of heparin anticoagulation. Prolonged balloon inflation at the perforation site was applied in 10/19 (53%) patients. Six (32%) patients received stents (5 of them received covered stentgrafts), 3 (16%) patients developed cardiac tamponade requiring percardiocentesis, and only 2 (11%) patients underwent bailout surgical repair. There were 2 (11%) deaths early after the procedure.

Conclusion:

Coronary perforation during PCI is a rare complication, but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In the majority of patients, non-surgical management is both feasible and associated with a high success-rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bittl JA, Sanborn TA, Tcheng JE, Siegel RM, Ellis SG, for the ELCA Registry (1992) Clinical success, complications and restenosis rates with excimer laser coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 70:1533–1539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Briguori C, Nishida T, Anzuini A, Di Mario C, Grube E, Colombo A (2000) Emergency polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation to treat coronary ruptures. Circulation 102:3028–3031

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell PG, Hall JA, Harcombe AA, de Belder MA (2000) The jomed covered stent graft for coronary artery aneurysms and acute perforation: a successful device which needs careful deployment and may not reduce restenosis. J Invasive Cardiol 12:272–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caputo RP, Amin N, Marvasti M, Wagner S, Levy C, Giambartolomei A (1999) Successful treatment of a saphenous vein graft perforation with an autologous vein-covered stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 48:382–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colombo A, Itoh A, Di Mario C, Maiello L, Arena V, Blengino S, Briati P, Ferraro M, Di Francesco L, Martini G (1996) Successful closure of a coronary vessel rupture with a vein graft stent: case report. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 38:172–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cordero H, Gupta N, Underwood PL, Gogte ST, Heuser RR (2001) Intracoronary autologous blood to seal a coronary perforation. Herz 26:157–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowley MJ, Dorros G, Kelsey SF, van Raden M, Detre KM (1984) Acute coronary events associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 53:12C–16C

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Del Campo C, Zelman R (2001) Management of coronary artery perforation in patients receiving abciximab. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 54:139–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dippel EJ, Kereiakes DJ, Tramuta DA, Broderick TM, Shimashak TM, Roth EM, Hattemer CR, Runyon JP, Whang DD, Schneider JF, Abbottsmith CW (2001) Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of abciximab platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: an algorithm for percutaneous management. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 52:279–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon SR, Webster MWI, Ormiston JA, Wattie WJ, Hammett CJ (2000) Gelfoam embolization of a distal coronary artery guidewire perforation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 49:214–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, Popma JJ, Bittl JA, Eigler NL, Cowley MJ, Raymond RE, Safian RD, Whitlow PL (1994) Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation 90:2725–2730

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elsner M, Auch-Schwelk W, Britten M, Walter DH, Schächtinger V, Zeiher AM (1999) Coronary stent grafts covered by a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. Am J Cardiol 84:335–338, A8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Erbel R, Class W, Busch U, v Seelen W, Brennecke R, Bloemer H, Meyer J (1986) New ballon catheter for prolonged percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and bypass flow in occluded vessels. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 12:116–123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fasseas P, Orford JL, Panetta CJ, Bell MR, Denktas AE, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR, Berger PB (2004) Incidence, correlates, management, and clinical outcome of coronary perforation: analysis of 16 298 procedures. Am Heart J 147:140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fejka M, Dixon SR, Safian RD, O’Neill WW, Grines CL, Finta B, Marcovitz PA, Kahn JK (2002) Diagnosis, management, and clinical outcome of cardiac tamponade complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 90:1183–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukutomi T, Suzuki T, Popma JJ, Hosokawa H, Yakoya K, Inada T, Hayase M, Kondo H, Ito S, Suzuki S, Itoh M (2002) Early and late clinical outcomes following coronary perforation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J 66:349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzalez-Santos JM, Vallejo JL, Pineda T, Zuazo JA (1985) Emergency surgery after coronary disruption complicating PTCA. Report of four cases. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 33:244–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gruberg L, Pinnow E, Flood R, Bonnet Y, Tebeica M, Waksman R, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Leon MB, Lindsay J Jr (2000) Incidence, management, and outcome of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 86:680–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunning MG, Williams IL, Jewitt DE, Shah AM, Wainwright RJ, Thomas MR (2002) Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous intervention: incidence and outcome. Heart 88:495–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haase KK, Baumbach A, Voelker W, Kühlkamp V, Karsch KR (1991) Perforation of the vascular wall after coronary excimer laser angioplasty. Z Kardiol 80:230–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jungbluth A, Düber C, Rumpelt HJ, Erbel R, Meyer J (1988) Koronararterienmorphologie nach perkutaner transluminaler Koronarangioplastie (PTCA) mit Hämoperikard. Z Kardiol 77:125–129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahmud E, Douglas JS Jr (2001) Coil embolization for successful treatment of perforation of chronically occluded proximal coronary artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 53:549–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reimers B, von Birgelen C, van der Giesen WJ, Serruys PW (1996) A word of caution on optimizing stent deployment in calcified lesions: a case of acute coronary rupture with cardiac tamponade. Am Heart J 131:192–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Satler LF (2002) A revised algorithm for coronary perforation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 57:215–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stankovic G, Orlic D, Corvaja N, Airoldi F, Chieffo A, Spanos V, Montorfano M, Carlino M, Finci L, Sangiorgi G, Colombo A (2004) Incidence, predictors, in-hospital, and late outcome of coronary artery perforations. Am J Cardio 93:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tugtekin SM, Alexiou K, Kappert U, Matschke K, Gulielmos V, Knaut M (2003) Chirurgische Therapie nach traumatischen interventionellen Koronarläsionen. Z Kardiol 92:833–836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Von Birgelen C, Haude M, Herrmann J, Altmann C, Klinkhart W, Welge D, Wieneke H, Baumgart D, Sack S, Erbel R (1999) Early clinical experience with the implantation of a novel synthetic coronary stent-graft. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 47:496–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Welge D, Haude M, von Birgelen C, Liu F, Altmann C, Ge J, Erbel R (1998) Versorgung einer Koronarperforation nach perkutaner Ballonangioplastie mit einem neuen Membranstent. Z Kardiol 87:948–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Eggebrecht.

Additional information

Dr. Eggebrecht is recipient of a research grant from the University Duisburg-Essen (IFORES 10+2)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eggebrecht, H., Ritzel, A., von Birgelen, C. et al. Acute and long-term outcome after coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary interventions. Z Kardiol 93, 791–798 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-004-0123-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-004-0123-z

Schlüsselwörter

Key words

Navigation