Skip to main content
Log in

Prognose und Monitoring bei akuter Pankreatitis

Prognosis and monitoring of acute pancreatitis

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin

Zusammenfassung

Die akute Pankreatitis (AP) ist ein potenziell tödliches Krankheitsbild mit in Deutschland steigender Inzidenz. Prognostisch entscheidend ist die möglichst frühe Erkennung der schweren/nekrotisierenden AP mit einer Mortalität von 15–42%. Dagegen verläuft die leichte/ödematöse Pankreatitis in <1% tödlich. Der Stellenwert verschiedener Prognoseparameter und Scores variiert abhängig vom zeitlichen Stadium der Erkrankung. Daher ist eine exakte Festlegung des Krankheitsbeginns mit Schmerzbeginn von großer Bedeutung. Abhängig davon sind mindestens 3 „prognostische Szenarien“ zu unterscheiden und die jeweilig validen Prädiktoren zu bestimmen. Für das „Szenario der Primärversorgung“ haben v. a. einfache Einzelparameter herausragende Bedeutung: Frühe Erstvorstellung, erhöhter Blutzucker, erhöhter Hämatokrit und erhöhter BUN sind Prädiktoren mit hoher Sensitivität und hohem negativ-prädiktivem Wert bei niedriger Spezifität und niedrigem positiv-prädiktivem Wert. Patienten, die eines oder mehrere dieser Kriterien erfüllen, sollten intensivmedizinisch behandelt werden. Nach ca. 48 h ergibt sich das „Szenario der frühen Reevaluation“. Zu diesem Zeitpunkt erreichen der APACHE-II-Score (Grenzwert >8) und der Ranson-Score (Grenzwert >3) sowie das CRP (>15 mg/dl) eine ausreichende Treffsicherheit. Für Intensivpatienten wurde ein eigener Prognosescore entwickelt, der als wesentliche Prädiktoren des „Szenarios der Intensivaufnahme“ arteriellen pH, Alter, MAP und BUN beinhaltet. Retrospektive Analysen am Ende des Intensivaufenthaltes belegen eine Assoziation der Mortalität mit der Notwendigkeit einer Nierenersatztherapie, minimalem Gesamteiweiß, minimalem Serumkalzium und minimalem arteriellem Bikarbonat.

Abstract

Acute pancraetitis is a potentially life-threatening disorder with increasing incidence. Early diagnosis and therapy of severe/necrotizing pancreatitis with a mortality of 15–42% is of paramount importance. By contrast, mild/edematous pancreatitis has a mortality below 1%. Prediction of severity as well as prognosis are further impeded by a marked time dependency of the prognostic value of the different predictors. Therefore, exact determination of the onset of symptoms (pain) is highly relevant. Depending on the time that the symptoms started, at least three prognostic scenarios with different values of prognostic markers have to be taken into account. Regarding the first presentation/emergency room scenario, several “simple” parameters have high prognostic value: early presentation (within <24 h after the onset of symptoms), increased blood glucose, increased hematocrit, and increased blood urea nitrogen (BUN) have been demonstrated to be predictors with high sensitivity and high negative predictive value, but low specificity and low positive predictive value. Patients fulfilling at least one of these criteria should be transferred to the ICU, although not all of these patients will develop severe/necrotizing pancreatitis. After 48 h (early re-evaluation scenario), the APACHE-II score (cut-off >8), the Ranson score (cut-off >3 points), and a serum CRP level >15 mg/dl have appropriate prognostic accuracy. For the subgroup of patients admitted to an ICU (ICU admission scenario), a specific score has been introduced with arterial pH, age, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and BUN being the most important predictors for mortality. Retrospective analyses at the end of the ICU stay demonstrated an association of mortality with the requirement of renal replacement therapy and minimum levels of serum protein, calcium, and arterial bicarbonate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Baillargeon JD, Orav J, Ramagopal V et al (1998) Hemoconcentration as an early risk factor for necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 93:2130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balthazar EJ (2002) Complications of acute pancreatitis: clinical and CT evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 40(6):1211–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley EL 3rd (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128:586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley EL 3rd, Allen K (1991) A prospective longitudinal study of observation versus surgical intervention in the management of necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Surg 161(1):19–24; discussion 24–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown A, Baillargeon JD, Hughes MD, Banks PA (2002) Can fluid resuscitation prevent pancreatic necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis? Pancreatology 2(2):104–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown A, Orav J, Banks PA (2000) Hemoconcentration is an early marker for organ failure and necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 20(4):367–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruennler T, Langgartner J, Lang S et al (2008) Outcome of patients with acute, necrotizing pancreatitis requiring drainage-does drainage size matter? World J Gastroenterol 14:725–730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernardinis M de, Violi V, Rancoroni L et al (1999) Discriminant power and information content of ranson’s prognostic signs in acute pancreatitis: a meta-analytic study. Crit Care Med 27:2272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeny PC, Hauptmann E, Althaus SJ et al (1998) Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(4):969–975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goepfert MSG, Reuter DA, Akyol D et al (2007) Goal-directed fluid management reduces vassopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 33:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrison DA, D’Amico G, Singer M (2007) The Pancreatitis Outcome Prediction (POP) Score: a new prognostic index for patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med 35:1703–1708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heinrich S, Schäfer M, Rousson V, Clavien P-A (2006) Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms. Ann Surg 243:154–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huber W, Eckel F, Hennig M et al (2006) Prophylaxis of contrast-induced nephropathy in ICU-patients: Acetylcysteine, Theophylline or both? A randomised study. Radiology 239:793–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huber W, Neudeck M, Hauptvogel K et al (2008) Prognostic factors and outcome of 121 patients with non-surgical therapy of necrotizing pancreatitis: What is the impact of an infection of the necrosis? Gastroenterology 134(Suppl 1):A-119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huber W, Rockmann F (2008) Invasive und nichtinvasive Möglichkeiten des haemodynamischen Monitorings. Intensivmed 45:337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huber W, Schmid RM (2007) Akute Pankreatitis: Evidenzbasierte Diagnostik und Therapie. Dtsch Ärztebl 104:A 1832–A 1842

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huber W, Umgelter A, Reindl W et al (2008) Volume assessment in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: a comparison of intrathoracic blood volume index, central venous pressure and hematocrit and their correlation to cardiac index and extravascular lung water index. Crit Care Med 36:2348–2354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huber W, Umgelter A, Schuster T, Schmid RM (2007) The Pancreatitis Outcome Prediction (POP) Score: How about hematocrit and leukopenia? Crit Care Med 35:2670–2671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13(10):818–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E et al (2004) Pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 32:691–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lankisch PG, Assmus C, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB (2002) Epidemiology of pancreatic diseases in Lüneburg County. A study in a defined German population. Pancreatology 2(5):469–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lankisch PG, Blum T, Bruns A et al (2001) Has blood glucose level measured on admission to hospital in a patient with acute pancreatitis any prognostic value? Pancreatology 1(3):224–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lankisch PG, Blum T, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB (2003) Severe acute pancreatitis: When to be concerned? Pancreatology 3:102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lankisch PG, Mahlke R, Blum T et al (2001) Hemoconcentration: an early marker of severe and/or necrotizing pancreatitis? A critical appraisal. Am J Gastroenterol 96(7):2081–2085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lankisch PG, Warnecke B, Bruns D et al (2002) The APACHE II score is unreliable to diagnose necrotizing pancreatitis on admission to hospital. Pancreas 24(3):217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Malbrain MLNG, Deeren D, De Potter TJR (2005) Intra-abdominal hypertension in the critically ill: It is time to pay attention. Curr Opin Crit Care 11:156–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Martinez J, Johnson CD, Sanchez-Paya J et al (2006) Obesity is a definitive risk factor of severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis. Pancreatology 6:206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Munoz-Bongrand N, Panis Y, Soyer P et al (2001) Serial computed tomography is rarely necessary in patients with acute pancreatitis: a prospective study in 102 patients. J Am Coll Surg 193(2):146–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P et al (2007) Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict haemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 35:64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A (2005) Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 95:746–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF et al (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139(1):69–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rau BM, Kemppainen EA, Gumbs AA et al (2007) Early assessment of pancreatic infections and overall prognosis in severe acute pancreatitis by procalcitonin (PCT): a prospective international multicenter study. Ann Surg 245(5):745–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C et al (2002) Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 28:392–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345:1368–1377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosas JM, Soto SN, Aracil JS et al (2007) Intra-abdominal pressure as a marker of severity in acute pancreatitis. Surgery 141(2):173–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ruenzi M, Niebel W, Goebell H et al (2005) Severe acute pancreatitis: nonsurgical treatment of infected necroses. Pancreas 30:195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saugel B, Phillip V, Hagemes F et al (2009) PROST – Pancreatitis during Oktoberfest Study: preliminary epidemiological data on acute pancreatitis in the greater area of Munich before, during and after the „Oktoberfest 2008“. Crit Care Med 37:A347

    Google Scholar 

  39. Seifert H, Wehrmann T, Schmitt T et al (2000) Retroperitoneal endoscopic debridement for infected peripancreatic necrosis. Lancet 356:653–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Uhl W, Warshaw A, Imrie C et al (2002) International association of pancreatology. IAP guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2:565–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Von Delius S, Huber W, Schmid RM (2009) Messung des intraabdominellen Drucks. Intensivmed. doi: 10.1007/s00390-009-0108-2

  42. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X et al (2008) The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut 57:1698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Huber.

Additional information

__ ____

DFG-Förderung: HU 1707/2-1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huber, W., Schmid, R. Prognose und Monitoring bei akuter Pankreatitis. Intensivmed 47, 243–250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00390-009-0157-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00390-009-0157-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation