Skip to main content
Log in

Akutes Darmversagen in der Intensivmedizin—

Therapeutische Ansätze

Acute failure of the gut in the critically ill—therapeutic aspects

  • ÜBERSICHT
  • Published:
Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin

Summary

The importance of the gastro-intestinal system has been neglected for a long time in critically ill patients. Fine and advanced contemporary hypotheses on the role of the gut as the main driver in critical illness, or an undrained abscess in multiple organ failure, or the central organ of surgical stress, however, have changed this view fundamentally. Considering that the gut with its intestinal mucosa, mesenteric lymph nodes and the associated liver is the largest immunologic system of the human organism, its importance in critically ill has become obvious. Acute intraabdominal diseases, sepsis, trauma, mechanical ventilation, drugs or lack of enteral feeding may lead to the clinical picture of mechanical or paralytic ileus or to complete gut failure. On the other hand, a poorly perfused or paralytic gut may induce or enhance sepsis or septic shock, probably via microbial translocation from the intestinal lumen over an altered intestinal barrier. Furthermore, the abdominal compartment syndrome defined by a sustained intraabdominal hypertension results in poor cardiac output, oliguria and atelectasis in the lung associated with impaired respiratory mechanics.

In this short review, we discuss the interactions between the diseased gut and systemic inflammation and infection as well as some important therapeutic principles like pharmacologic modulation of the splanchnic perfusion, early enteral nutrition, and enterocyte specific substrates (glutamine). Another focus lies on the effects of prokinetic drugs like erythromycin, metoclopramide, and parasympthomimetics on gastric, small and large bowel movement. In surgical patients the use of continuous epidural analgesia via a thoracic or lumbar epidural catheter seems to lower the rate of postoperative ileus significantly when compared to conventional analgesia by opiates. Epidural analgesia elegantly combines sufficient analgesia and sympatholysis, which results in an earlier recovery of small and large bowel movements. The life-threatening abdominal compartment syndrome, which may follow severe abdominal trauma, rupture of the abdominal aorta or ileus, is a further important aspect in the management of critically ill patients. When the condition is severe, verified by some objective measurements of the intraabdominal pressure, surgical abdominal decompression is required.

Zusammenfassung

Der Gastrointestinaltrakt mit der Aufgabe des Nahrungstransports, der Nährstoff-, Wasser- und Elektrolytresorption und der Elimination unverdaulicher Nahrungsbestandteile, stellt aufgrund seiner Barrierefunktion zwischen innerem und äußerem Milieu und dem damit einhergehendem permanenten Antigenreiz das größte immunologische Organ des Organismus dar. Akute Erkrankungen des Abdomens, Sepsis, Beatmung oder Medikamente können zum Bild des mechanischen oder paralytischen Ileus oder bis hin zum manifesten Darmversagen führen, respektive kann eine gestörte gastrointestinale Funktion systemischen Entzündungsreaktionen (SIRS, Sepsis) induzieren oder unterhalten.

In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden die pathophysiologischen Zusammenhänge des Darmversagens beim Intensivpatienten kurz erläutert, wobei insbesondere auf die Wechselwirkungen zwischen Darmversagen und systemischer Inflammation und Infektion fokussiert wird. Auf dieser Basis werden medikamentöse Therapieansätze (z. B. Perfusionssteigerung, Prokinetika, Periduralanalgesie), sowie nutritive Maßnahmen (frühe enterale Ernährung, Glutamin) zur Behandlung des Darmversagens kritisch diskutiert. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Beeinflussung der intestinalen Peristaltik durch Prokinetika und kontinuierliche Katheterperiduralanalgesie beim Intensivpatienten und bei Patienten mit ausgedehnten abdominellen chirurgischen Eingriffen („postoperativer Ileus“). Das lebensbedrohliche abdominelle Kompartmentsyndrom, meist hervorgerufen durch schweres abdominelles Trauma, Aortenruptur oder Ileus stellt einen eigenständigen Symptomenkomplex dar. Typischerweise kommt es hier zu einer Reduktion der Perfusion im Splanchnikusgebiet, zur Oligo-Anurie, und zur Atelektasenbildung in der Lunge mit respiratorischer Insuffizienz. Klinische Zeichen und eine objektive Messung des intraabdominellen Drucks sind die Voraussetzung für eine chirurgische Dekompression. Ergänzt werden die Strategien zur Behandlung des akuten Darmversagens durch Aspekte und Hinweise für die klinische Praxis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn H et al (1988) Effect of continuous postoperative epidural analgesia on intestinal motility. Br J Surg 75:1176–1178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aitkenhead AR (1988) Anaesthesia and the gastro-intestinal system. Eur J Anaesthesiol 5:73–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alverdy JC et al (1988) Total parenteral nutrition promotes bacterial translocation from the gut. Surgery 104:185–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg RD, Garlington AW (1979) Translocation of certain indigenous bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to the mesenteric lymph nodes and other organs in a gnotobiotic mouse model. Infect Immun 23:403–411

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger D (2002) Der Darm als Motor des Multiorganversagens. In: Forst Buchardi E (Hrsg) Intensivmedizin. Ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft AG & Co. KG, Landsberg/Lech, VIII-12:1–7

  6. Boivin MA et al (2003) Erythromycin accelerates gastric emptying in a dose-response manner in healthy subjects. Pharmacotherapy 23:5–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borody TJ et al (1985) Effects of morphine and atropine on motility and transit in the human ileum. Gastroenterology 89:562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brinkmann A et al (1998) Monitoring the hepato-splanchnic region in the critically ill patient. Intensive Care Med 24:542–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cain SM, Curtis SE (1991) Systemic and regional oxygen uptake and delivery and lactate flux in endotoxic dogs infused with dopexamin. Crit Care Med 19:1552–1560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman MJ et al (2000) Erythromycin improves gastric emptying in critically ill patients intolerant of nasogastric feeding. Crit Care Med 28:2334–2337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feltis B, Wells CL (2000) Does microbial translocation play a role in critical illness? Curr Opin Crit Care 6:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fong Y et al (1989) Total parenteral nutrition and bowel rest modify the metabolic response to endotoxin in humans. Annals of Surgery 210:449–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goris RJA, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP (1999) The gut: the “motor” of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome? Curr Opin Crit Care 5:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  14. Groeneveld AB (1998) Measuring splanchnic perfusion. Current Opinion in Critical Care 4:111–115

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grote R, Zielmann S (1995) Gastrointestinale Motilitätsstörungen beim Intensivpatienten. Anaesthesist 44:595–609

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guidelines for use of total parenteral nutrition in the hospitalized adult patient. ASPEN. Board of directors. JPEN 10:441–445

  17. Herbert MK (1999) Impairment of intestinal motility in the critically ill patient. Clinical implications and contribution of drugs and mediators. In: Herbert MK, Holzer P, Roewer N (eds) Problems of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Anaesthesia, the Perioperative Period, and Intensive Care. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore, Tokyo, pp 28–38

  18. Herbert MK (2001) Die Magen-Darm-Atonie beim Intensivpatienten. Mechanismen, Ursache, Therapie. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 36:337–359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Herbert MK (2002) Beeinträchtigung der Magen-Darm-Motilität durch Pharmaka und Mediatoren. In: Forst Buchardi E (Hrsg) Intensivmedizin. Ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft AG & Co. KG, Landsberg/Lech, X-1:1–18

  20. Heyland DK et al (1993) Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a critical review of the evidence. Intensive Care Med 19:435–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Heyland DK et al (2001) Should Immunonutrition Become Routine in Critically Ill Patients? JAMA 286:944–953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Heyland DK et al (2003) Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition Support in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Adult Patients. JPEN 27:355–373

    Google Scholar 

  23. Holte K, Kehlet H (2000) Postoperative Ileus: a preventable event. British Journal of surgery 87:1480–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hutcheson IR, Whittle BJ et al (1990) Role of nitric oxide in maintaining vascular integrity in endotoxin-induced acute intestinal damage in rat. British Journal of Pharmacology 101:815–820

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones WG et al (1991) Splanchnic vasoconstriction and bacterial translocation after thermal injury. American Journal of Physiology 261:H1190–1196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Knichwitz G (2002) Die kontinuierliche intramukosale pCO2-Messung: klinischer Stellenwert. In: Forst Buchardi E (Hrsg) Intensivmedizin. Ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft AG & Co. KG, Landsberg/Lech, X-3:1–10

  27. Kopman L et al (1999) Effects of early enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability and the development of multiple organ failure after multiple injury. Intensive Care Med 25:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis SJ et al (2001) Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 323:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lübke HJ (2000) Protektion der Mukosabarriere durch Strategien der Ernährung—Welche therapeutischen Optionen gibt es? Anaesthesist 49:455–459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mac Fie J et al (1999) Gut origin of sepsis: a prospective study investigating associations between bacterial translocation , gastric microflora, and septic morbidity. Gut 45:223–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Maganti et al (2003) Oral Erythromycin and symptomatic Relief of Gastroparesis: A systematic review. AJG 98:259–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marik PE, Zaloga GP (2001) Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: A systematic review. Crit Care Med 29:2264–2270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Meier-Hellmann A (2000) Hämodynamische Stabilisierung in der Sepsis. Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin 41:601–613

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meier-Hellmann A (2004) Basistherapie der Sepsis: Kausale und supportive Therapie. In: Forst Buchardi E (Hrsg) Intensivmedizin. Ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft AG & Co. KG, Landsberg/Lech, VIII-4:1–26

  35. Meissner W et al (2003) Opioidantagonisten zur Behandlung von gastrointestinalen Motilitätsstörungen. Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin 44:825–840

    Google Scholar 

  36. Meldrum DR et al (1997) Prospective characterization and selective management of the abdominal compartment syndrom. Am J Surg 174:667–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Moore FA et al (1989) TEN versus TPN following major abdominal trauma—Reduced septic morbidity. Journal of Trauma 29:916–922

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Novak F et al (2002) Glutamine supplementation in serious illness: A systematic review of the evidence. Crit Care Med 30:2022–2029

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Oberholzer A, Ertel W (2002) Das abdominelle Kompartmentsyndrom. In: Forst Buchardi E (Hrsg) Intensivmedizin. Ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft AG & Co. KG, Landsberg/Lech, XIII-3.1:1–12

  40. O’Boyle CJ et al (1998) Microbiology of bacterial translocation in humans. Gut 42:29–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rivers E et al (2001) Early goal directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345:1368–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Roth E et al (1996) Glutamin: Wirkungen auf das Immunsystem, auf Eiweißhaushalt und Darmfunktionen. Wien Klin Wochenschr 108:669–676

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rush BF et al (1988) Endotoxemia and bacteremia during hemorrhagic shock. The link between trauma and sepsis? Ann Surg 207:549–554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Saunders MD (2003) Colonic pseudoobstruction: the dilated colon in the ICU. Semin Gastrointest Dis 14:20–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stark SP et al (1991) Endoscopically placed nasoenteral feeding tubes. Indications and techniques. Am Surgeon 57:203–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Takala J, Ruokonen E (1992) Blood flow and oxygen transport in septic shock. Clinical Intensive Care 3(Suppl):24–27

    Google Scholar 

  47. Temmesfeld-Wollbrück B, Olschewski H et al (1994) Schockbedingte Darmveränderungen beim Multiorganversagen: pathophysiologische, diagnostische und therapeutische Aspekte. Intensivmed 31:359–375

    Google Scholar 

  48. Temmesfeld Wollbruck B et al (1998) Abnormalities of gastric mucosal oxygenation in septic shock: Partial responsiveness to dopexamine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:1586–1592

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. van der Hulst RRW et al (1993) Glutamine and the preservation of gut integrity. Lancet 341:1363–1365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. van der Spoel JI et al (2001) Neostigmine resolves critical illness related colonic ileus in intensive care patients with multiple organ failure—a prospective, double-blind, placebo-corntrolled trial. Intensive Care Med 27:822–827

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zaloga GP (1999) Early enteral nutritional support improves outcome: hypothesis or fact? Crit Care Med 27:259–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ziegler TR, Smith RJ et al (1988) Increased intestinal permeability associated with infection in burn patients. Archives of Surgery 123:1313–1319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Zügel N et al (2000) Einfluss der thorakalen Epiduralanästhesie auf die frühe postoperative Phase nach Eingriffen am Gastrointestinaltrakt. Chirurg 73:262–268

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Ragaller.

Additional information

Serie: Die Intensivtherapie bei Sepsis und Multiorganversagen Herausgegeben von L. Engelmann (Leipzig)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ragaller, M., Gottschlich, B. Akutes Darmversagen in der Intensivmedizin—. Intensivmed 42, 627–638 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00390-005-0528-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00390-005-0528-6

Key words

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation