Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aims to identify which risk factors are associated with the appearance of an incisional hernia in a stoma site after its closure. This in the sake of identifying which patients would benefit from a preventative intervention and thus start implementing a cost-effective protocol for prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients.

Methods

A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting incidence, risk factors, and follow-up time for appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure were included. A fixed-effects and random effects models were used to calculate odds ratios’ estimates and standardized mean values with their respective grouped 95% confidence interval. This to evaluate the association between possible risk factors and the appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure.

Results

Seventeen studies totaling 2899 patients were included. Incidence proportion between included studies was of 16.76% (CI95% 12.82; 21.62). Out of the evaluated factors higher BMI (p = 0.0001), presence of parastomal hernia (p = 0.0023), colostomy (p = 0,001), and end stoma (p = 0.0405) were associated with the appearance of incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure, while malignant disease (p = 0.0084) and rectum anterior resection (p = 0.0011) were found to be protective factors.

Conclusions

Prophylactic mesh placement should be considered as an effective preventative intervention in high-risk patients (obese patients, patients with parastomal hernia, colostomy, and end stoma patients) with the goal of reducing incisional hernia rates in stoma site after closure while remaining cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data used in the present study are available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Wilson MZ (2022) We asked the experts: repair techniques as prevention: ostomy closure is an incisional hernia repair. World J Surg 46(8):1896–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06540-x

  2. De Haes F, Bullen NL, Antoniou GA, Smart NJ, Antoniou SA (2020) Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy. Hernia 24(1):9–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01961-5

  3. Bhangu A, Fletcher L, Kingdon S, Smith E, Nepogodiev D, Janjua U (2012) A clinical and radiological assessment of incisional hernias following closure of temporary stomas. Surgeon 10(6):321–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2012.01.001

  4. Stabilini C, Garcia-Urena MA, Berrevoet F, Cuccurullo D, Capoccia Giovannini S, Dajko M et al (2022) An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure. Hernia 26(2):411–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02555-w

  5. Peltrini R, Imperatore N, Altieri G, Castiglioni S, Di Nuzzo MM, Grimaldi L et al (2021) Prevention of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure with different reinforcing mesh types: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia (0123456789). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02393-w

  6. Mohamedahmed AYY, Stonelake S, Zaman S, Hajibandeh S (2020) Closure of stoma site with or without prophylactic mesh reinforcement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(8):1477–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alli VV, Zhang J, Telem DA (2018) Impact of incisional hernia development following abdominal operations on total healthcare cost. Surg Endosc 32(5):2381–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5936-8

  8. Sheikh Y, Asunramu H, Low H, Gakhar D, Muthukumar K, Yassin H et al (2022) A cost-utility analysis of mesh prophylaxis in the prevention of incisional hernias following stoma closure surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(20).

  9. Rhemtulla IA, Messa CA, Enriquez FA, Hope WW, Fischer JP (2018) Role of prophylactic mesh placement for laparotomy and stoma creation. Surg Clin North Am 98(3):471–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith L, Meggy A, Watts T, Knight L, Torkington J, Cornish J (2022) Incisional hernia prevention: risk-benefit from a patient perspective (INVITE) - protocol for a single-centre, mixed-methods, cross-sectional study aiming to determine if using prophylactic mesh in incisional hernia prevention is acceptable to patients. BMJ Open 12(12):e069568

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lambrichts DPV, de Smet GHJ, van der Bogt RD, Kroese LF, Menon AG, Jeekel J et al (2018) Incidence, risk factors and prevention of stoma site incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 20(10):O288-303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harries RL, Torkington J (2018) Stomal closure: strategies to prevent incisional hernia. Front Surg 5(April):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, The PRISMA et al (2020) statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021:372

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, Verhoog S, Bohlius J, Bramer W et al (2020) A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol 35(1):49–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5

  15. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (Minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DerSimonian R, Laird N (2015) Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials 45:139–145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rücker G (2023) Meta-analysis with R. First. Springer Cham. pp 1–218

  18. Calvo Espino P, Sánchez Movilla A, Alonso Sebastian I, García Schiever J, Varillas Delgado D, Sánchez Turrión V et al (2022) Incidence and risk factors of delayed development for stoma site incisional hernia after ileostomy closure in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with temporary ileostomy. Acta Chir Belg 122(1):41–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2020.1846941

  19. Ramírez-Giraldo C, Torres-Cuellar A, Cala-Noriega C, Figueroa-Avendaño CE, Navarro-Alean J (2021) When to use a prophylactic mesh after stoma closure: a case–control study. Hernia (0123456789):9–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02508-3

  20. Bloomfield I, Dobson B, Von Papen M, Clark D (2022) Incisional hernia following ileostomy closure: who’s at risk? The Gold Coast experience. ANZ J Surg 92(1–2):146–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mongelard K, Mynster T, Jensen KK (2020) Stoma-site hernia after stoma reversal following rectal cancer resection. Dan Med J 67(3):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eklöv K, Viktorsson FZ, Frosztega E, Bringman S, Nygren J, Everhov ÅH (2020) Hernia at the stoma site after loop ileostomy reversal. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(5):887–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly-Schuette K, Wilkes A, Kyriakakis R, Ogilvie J (2020) Predictors of hernia after loop ileostomy closure: a single-center retrospective review. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(9):1695–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Robles MS, Bakhtiar A, Young CJ (2019) Obesity is a significant risk factor for ileostomy site incisional hernia following reversal. ANZ J Surg 89(4):399–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaneko T, Funahashi K, Ushigome M, Kagami S, Goto M, Koda T et al (2019) Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after closure of temporary ileostomy for colorectal malignancy. Hernia 23(4):743–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1855-4

  26. Brook AJ, Mansfield SD, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2018) Incisional hernia following closure of loop ileostomy: the main predictor is the patient, not the surgeon. Surgeon 16(1):20–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.03.004

  27. Amelung FJ, de Guerre LEVM, Consten ECJ, Kist JW, Verheijen PM, Broeders IAMJ et al (2018) Incidence of and risk factors for stoma-site incisional herniation after reversal. BJS Open 2(3):128–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Vergara-Fernández O, Trejo-Avila M, Salgado-Nesme N (2019) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for complications after loop ileostomy closure. Cir y Cir (English Ed.) 87(3):337–46.

  29. Oriel BS, Chen Q, Itani KMF (2017) Incidence, recurrence and risk factors of hernias following stoma reversal. Am J Surg 214(2):232–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fazekas B, Fazekas B, Hendricks J, Smart N, Arulampalam T (2017) The incidence of incisional hernias following ileostomy reversal in colorectal cancer patients treated with anterior resection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99(4):319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Keersmaecker G, Beckers R, Heindryckx E, Kyle-Leinhase I, Pletinckx P, Claeys D et al (2016) Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after reversal of a temporary diverting ileostomy following rectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scans. Hernia 20(2):271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharp SP, Francis JK, Valerian BT, Canete JJ, Chismark AD, Lee EC (2015) Incidence of ostomy site incisional hernias after stoma closure. Am Surg 81(12):1244–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cingi A, Solmaz A, Attaallah W, Aslan A, Aktan AO (2008) Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. Hernia 12(4):401–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1559–1563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Simons MP, Smietanski M, Bonjer HJ, Bittner R, Miserez M, Aufenacker TJ et al (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Henriksen NA, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F (2020) Smoking and obesity are associated with increased readmission after elective repair of small primary ventral hernias: a nationwide database study. Surgery 168(3):527–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.012

  37. Nachiappan S, Markar S, Karthikesaligam A, Ziprin P, Faiz O (2013) Prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients undergoing elective laparotomy: a systematic review. World J Surg 37(8):1861–1871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fox SS, Johnson R, Fischer JP, Eckhauser F, Hope WW (2018) Prophylactic mesh for hernia prevention: Has the time arrived? Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3S):180S-186S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lorenz A, Kogler P, Kafka-Ritsch R, Öfner D, Perathoner A (2019) Incisional hernia at the site of stoma reversal—incidence and risk factors in a retrospective observational analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 34(7):1179–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Barranquero AG, Tobaruela E, Bajawi M, Muñoz P, Die Trill J, Garcia-Perez JC (2020) Incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia after temporary loop ileostomy closure: choosing candidates for prophylactic mesh placement. Hernia 24(1):93–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02042-3

  41. Schreinemacher MHF, Vijgen GHEJ, Dagnelie PC, Bloemen J, Huizinga BF, Bouvy ND (2014) Incisional hernias in temporary stoma wounds. ARCH SURG 146(1):94–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fok CYJ, Fung TLD, Kwok KH (2021) Predictors of morbidity related to stoma closure after colorectal cancer surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 406(2):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Niu N, Du S, Yang D, Zhang L, Wu B, Zhi X et al (2022) Risk factors for the development of a parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 37(3):507–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, Berger D, Bury K, Conze J et al (2014) European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia 18(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure. World J Surg 36(5):973–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang C, Ogawa R (2014) The link between hypertension and pathological scarring: Does hypertension cause or promote keloid and hypertrophic scar pathogenesis? Wound Repair Regen 22(4):462–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. van den Hil LCL, van Steensel S, Schreinemacher MHF, Bouvy ND (2019) Prophylactic mesh placement to avoid incisional hernias after stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23(4):733–741

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Feldmann TF, Young MT, Pigazzi A (2014) Incisional reinforcement in high-risk patients. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 27(4):149–155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Ives N, Magill L, Glasbey J, Forde C et al (2020) Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 395(10222):417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Warren JA, Beffa LR, Carbonell AM, Cull J, Sinopoli B, Ewing JA et al (2018) Prophylactic placement of permanent synthetic mesh at the time of ostomy closure prevents formation of incisional hernias. Surg (United States) 163(4):839–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.041

  51. Shaw RD, Goldwag JL, Wilson LR, Ivatury SJ, Tsapakos MJ, Pauli EM et al (2022) Retrorectus mesh reinforcement of ileostomy site fascial closure: stoma closure and reinforcement (SCAR) trial phase I/II results. Hernia 26(6):1645–1652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Maggiori L, Moszkowicz D, Zappa M, Mongin C, Panis Y (2015) Bioprosthetic mesh reinforcement during temporary stoma closure decreases the rate of incisional hernia: A blinded, case-matched study in 94 patients with rectal cancer. Surg (United States) 158(6):1651–1657

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CR-G: Study conception and design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. IV-L: Data analysis and interpretation, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. DCM: Analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. JN-A: Study conception and design, data acquisition, critical revision of manuscript. JH-F: Study conception and design, data acquisition, critical revision of manuscript. DH-Á: Study conception and design, data acquisition, critical revision of manuscript. SRL: Drafting of manuscript and critical revision of manuscript. VA: Data analysis, drafting of manuscript and critical revision of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Registration of research studies

Available on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023397394).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 12 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramírez-Giraldo, C., Van-Londoño, I., Monroy, D.C. et al. Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 38, 267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04560-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04560-0

Keywords

Navigation