Abstract
Background
Our clinical experience led us to raise questions about the validity of the reported risk factors and patient characteristics associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer.
Objective
The present retrospective study aimed to identify and compare our center’s incidence and risk factors for a permanent ostomy after low anterior resection (LAR) with a diverting stoma for locally advanced mid and low rectal cancer with those in published reports.
Patients
A total of 239 patients underwent a sphincter-preserving procedure (LAR) for rectal cancer between 2000 and 2018, and 236 of them (age range 33–83 years, 100 males (42%)) were included in the analysis. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups comprised of patients with and without permanent stomas after rectal cancer surgery.
Results
Only 25 of the 236 operated patients (10.6%) remained with permanent stomas after rectal cancer surgery. Factors associated with stoma non-closure in the multivariate analysis were pathological stage 3 (13 (52%) vs 51 (24.2%) for patients with closed stomas, p = 0.032), disease recurrence (14 (56%) vs 40 (18.9%), respectively, p = 0.048), length of stay > 10 days, p = 0.032), and anastomotic leaks with a Clavien–Dindo score > 2 or reoperations (6 (24%) vs 13 (6.1%), p = 0.019).
Conclusions
Sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer was associated with a lower incidence of stoma non-closure than published values. The major risk factors for non-closure were aggressive disease and severe complications of surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shiomi A, Ito M, Saito N et al (2011) The indications for a diverting stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective multicentre study of 222 patients from Japanese cancer centers. Colorectal Dis 13(12):1384–1389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02481.x
Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024
Peeters KCMJ, Tollenaar RAEM, Marijnen CAM et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(2):211–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4806
Mäkelä JT, Niskasaari M (2006) Stoma care problems after stoma surgery in Northern Finland. Scand J Surg 95(1):23–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690609500105
Bailey CMH, Wheeler JMD, Birks M, Farouk R (2003) The incidence and causes of permanent stoma after anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 5(4):331–334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.4.s1.1_78.x
den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KCMJ et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8(4):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70047-5
David GG, Slavin JP, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Khan AU, Selvasekar CR (2010) Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary? Colorectal Dis 12(5):428–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01815.x
Junginger T, Gönner U, Trinh TT, Lollert A, Oberholzer K, Berres M (2010) Permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53(12):1632–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ed0aae
Seo SI, Yu CS, Kim GS et al (2013) Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg 37(10):2490–2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2145-z
Kairaluoma M, Rissanen H, Kultti V, Mecklin J-P, Kellokumpu I (2002) Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996. Dig Surg 19(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000052005
Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R, Matthiessen P (2011) What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd2948
Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91510-2
Piccirillo JF, Tierney RM, Costas I, Grove L, Spitznagel EL (2004) Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. JAMA 291(20):2441–2447. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.20.2441
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K et al (2016) Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today 46:668–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x
Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf65
Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(5):462–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6594
Chen J, Wang D-R, Yu H-F, Zhao Z-K, Wang L-H, Li Y-K (2012) Defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta- analysis of five recent studies. Hepatogastroenterology 59(118):1828–1831. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11786
Hanna MH, Vinci A, Pigazzi A (2015) Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary? Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(2):145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1
Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V et al (2008) Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study Hepatogastroenterology 55(86–87):1562–1567
Neuman HB, Park J, Fuzesi S, Temple LK (2012) Rectal cancer patients’ quality of life with a temporary stoma: shifting perspectives. Dis Colon Rectum 55(11):1117–1124. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182686213
Bakx R, Busch ORC, Bemelman WA, Veldink GJ, Slors JFM, van Lanschot JJB (2004) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 21(4):277–281. https://doi.org/10.1159/000080201
Thong DW, Kim J, Naik A, Lu CT, Nolan GJ, Von Papen M (2020) Delay to adjuvant chemotherapy: survival and recurrence in patients of rectal cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. J Gastrointest Cancer 51(3):877–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-019-00312-y
Ourô S, Ferreira MP, Albergaria D, Maio R (2021) Loop ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: factors predicting reversal and stoma related morbidity. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406(3):843–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02169-x
Lim SW, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2013) Risk factors for permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398(2):259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1038-1
Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345(9):638–646. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010580
Schlesinger NH, Smith H (2020) The effect of a diverting stoma on morbidity and risk of permanent stoma following anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(10):1903–1910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03625-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This paper was presented as a poster at the Annual meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons in Nashville, TN, May 19-23, 2018. E-poster Number: P435.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barenboim, A., Geva, R. & Tulchinsky, H. Revised risk factors and patient characteristics for failure to close a defunctioning ileostomy following low anterior resection for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 37, 1611–1619 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04188-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04188-6