Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraperitoneal contamination index (Hajibandeh index) predicts nature of peritoneal contamination and risk of postoperative mortality in patients with acute abdominal pathology: a prospective multicentre cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess whether intraperitoneal contamination index (ICI) (Hajibandeh index) derived from combined levels of CRP, lactate, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and albumin can predict the nature of intraperitoneal contamination in patients with acute abdominal pathology and to assess whether ICI can predict postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

Methods

In order to prospectively validate the ICI, developed and validated retrospectively in our previous study, a multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2019 and June 2020 including all adult patients who presented with acute abdominal pathology requiring emergency laparotomy. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine discrimination and cut-off values of preoperative ICI that could predict the nature of intraperitoneal contamination and postoperative mortality.

Results

Overall, 269 patients were included in the prospective validation cohort which were compared with 234 patients in the primary cohort and 234 patients in the retrospective validation cohort. The analyses identified ICI of 24.76 as cut-off value for purulent contamination (AUC: 0.78, P < 0.0001; sensitivity: 82.4%, specificity: 60.9%); ICI of 33.84 as cut-off value for feculent contamination (AUC: 0.78, P < 0.0001; sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 67.8%), and ICI of 33.47 as cut-off value for postoperative mortality (AUC: 0.70, P < 0.0001; sensitivity: 72.7%, specificity: 58.47%). The results of the prospective validation cohort were comparable with the results of the primary and retrospective validation cohorts.

Conclusions

Hajibandeh index predicts the presence of purulent and feculent intraperitoneal contamination in patients with acute abdominal pathology and postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Future studies should investigate the effect of ICI use on the accuracy of preoperative prognostic scoring tools and on patient selection for operative or non-operative management of underlying abdominal pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sartelli M, Chichom-Mefire A, Labricciosa FM et al (2017) The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg 12:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oliver CM, Walker E, Giannaris S, Grocott MP, Moonesinghe SR (2015) Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth 115(6):849–860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Hobbs N, Shah J, Harris M, Watton L, Huq Z, Dalmia S, Malik S, Mansour M (2020) A validated novel preoperative index to predict the extent of intraperitoneal contamination in patients with acute abdominal pathology: A cohort study. J Perioper Pract 30(7-8):221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowsby R, Gomes C, Jarman I, Lisboa P, Nee PA, Vardhan M, Eckersley T, Saleh R, Mills H (2015) Neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio as an early indicator of blood stream infection in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 32(7):531–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vladimirova SG, Tarasova LN, Sokol'skaia O, Cherepanova VV (2013) C-reactive protein as a marker of the severity of an infectious process in acute myeloid leukemia patients with neutropenia. Ter Arkh 85(11):34–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charlton M, Sims M, Coats T, Thompson JP (2017) The microcirculation and its measurement in sepsis. J Intensive Care Soc 18(3):221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gradel KO, Thomsen RW, Lundbye-Christensen S, Nielsen H, Schonheyder HC (2011) Baseline C-reactive protein level as a predictor of mortality in bacteraemia patients: a population-based cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 17(4):627–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Artero A, Zaragoza R, Camarena JJ, Sancho S, Gonzalez R, Nogueira JM (2017) Prognostic factors of mortality in patients with community-acquired bloodstream infection with severe sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care 25(2):276–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, Thavayogan R, Orgill DP, STROCSS Group (2017) The STROCSS statement: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg 46:198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wacha H, Linder MM, Feldman U, Wesch G, Gundlach E, Steifensand RA (1987) Mannheim peritonitis index – prediction of risk of death from peritonitis: construction of a statistical and validation of an empirically based index. Theor Surg 1:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muralidhar VA, Madhu CP, Sudhir S, Srinivasarangan M (2014) Efficacy of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) Score in patients with secondary peritonitis. J Clin Diagn Res 8(12):NC01–NC03

    Google Scholar 

  13. NELA Risk Calculator. Available at https://data.nela.org.uk/riskcalculator/. Accessed 02 June 2020

  14. Eugene N, Oliver CM, Bassett MG, Poulton TE, Kuryba A, Johnston C, Anderson ID, Moonesinghe SR, Grocott MP, Murray DM, Cromwell DA, Walker K, Cripps M, Cripps P, Davies E, Drake S, Galsworthy M, Goodwin J, Salih T, Lourtie J, Papadimitriou D, Peden C (2018) Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model. Br J Anaesth 121(4):739–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg 85(9):1217–1220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Igari K, Ochiai T, Yamazaki S (2013) POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk assessment in general surgery in the elderly. Hepatogastroenterology 60(126):1320–1327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: SH

Data collection: SH, JS, SH, SM, MS, SI, AA, RM, NW

Analysis and interpretation: SH, SH, JS

Writing the article: SH, SH, JS

Critical revision of the article: All authors

Final approval of the article: All authors

SH, JS, and SH equally contributed to this paper and joined first authorship is proposed

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahab Hajibandeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted with respect to the institution’s policy and internal arrangements approved by the local Clinical Governance Unit.

Informed consent and patient details

Considering the design of this study, patient consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hajibandeh, S., Shah, J., Hajibandeh, S. et al. Intraperitoneal contamination index (Hajibandeh index) predicts nature of peritoneal contamination and risk of postoperative mortality in patients with acute abdominal pathology: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 36, 1023–1031 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03822-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03822-5

Keywords

Navigation