Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What is the appropriate cut-off value of CRP to predict endoscopic remission in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Noninvasive markers for predicting endoscopic remission (ER) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are in clinical remission (CR) are important for the determination of appropriate treatment modality. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a surrogate marker for assessing disease activity, albeit with a low sensitivity and specificity when the cut-off value is 0.3 or 0.5 mg/dL, which is usually considered normal. The CRP test has been improved, and even fine values within the normal range can be measured. The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate cut-off value of CRP below 0.3 mg/dL for the prediction of ER in UC patients with CR.

Methods

A total of 132 patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation during CR were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and endoscopic activity was measured using a simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) and Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). ER was defined as MES 0 or 1.

Results

In UC patients in CR, the CRP level was significantly lower in ER (0.05, 0.03–2.57) vs. non-ER (0.14, 0.03–2.81) (p < 0.001). The CRP value predicted ER [area under the curve (AUC = 0.710)] with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 71.7% at a cut-off value of 0.09 mg/dL. In contrast, the value of normal CRP (< 0.3 mg/dL) did not show sufficient predictive value (sensitivity, 27.3%; and specificity, 90.9%).

Conclusions

In UC patients in CR, it may be helpful to lower the CRP cut-off value that predict ER other than 0.3 mg/dL, which is usually considered normal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ordas I, Eckmann L, Talamini M, Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ (2012) Ulcerative colitis. Lancet 380:1606–1619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi CH, Jung SA, Lee BI, Lee KM, Kim JS, Han DS, I. B. D. Study Group of the Korean Association of the Study of Intestinal Diseases (2009) Diagnostic guideline of ulcerative colitis. Korean J Gastroenterol 53:145–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gross V, Andus T, Caesar I, Roth M, Scholmerich J (1992) Evidence for continuous stimulation of interleukin-6 production in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 102:514–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D'Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Geboes K, Hanauer SB, Irvine EJ, Lemann M, Marteau P, Rutgeerts P, Scholmerich J, Sutherland LR (2007) A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 132:763–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Sandborn W, Sands BE, Reinisch W, Bemelman W, Bryant RV, D'Haens G, Dotan I, Dubinsky M, Feagan B, Fiorino G, Gearry R, Krishnareddy S, Lakatos PL, Loftus EV Jr, Marteau P, Munkholm P, Murdoch TB, Ordas I, Panaccione R, Riddell RH, Ruel J, Rubin DT, Samaan M, Siegel CA, Silverberg MS, Stoker J, Schreiber S, Travis S, Van Assche G, Danese S, Panes J, Bouguen G, O'Donnell S, Pariente B, Winer S, Hanauer S, Colombel JF (2015) Selecting therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease (STRIDE): determining therapeutic goals for treat-to-target. Am J Gastroenterol 110:1324–1338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoon JG, Choi MJ, Yoon JW, Noh JY, Song JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ (2017) Seroprevalence and disease burden of acute hepatitis A in adult population in South Korea. PLoS One 12:e0186257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Neurath MF, Travis SP (2012) Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review. Gut 61:1619–1635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parragi L, Fournier N, Zeitz J, Scharl M, Greuter T, Schreiner P, Misselwitz B, Safroneeva E, Schoepfer AM, Vavricka SR, Rogler G, Biedermann L, Swiss I. B. D. Cohort Study Group (2018) Colectomy rates in ulcerative colitis are low and decreasing: 10-year follow-up data from the Swiss IBD cohort study. J Crohns Colitis 12:811–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Narang V, Kaur R, Garg B, Mahajan R, Midha V, Sood N, Sood A (2018) Association of endoscopic and histological remission with clinical course in patients of ulcerative colitis. Intest Res 16:55–61

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Castaño-Milla C, Chaparro M, Gisbert JP (2014) Systematic review with meta-analysis: the declining risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 39:645–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamaguchi S, Takeuchi Y, Arai K, Fukuda K, Kuroki Y, Asonuma K, Takahashi H, Saruta M, Yoshida H (2016) Fecal calprotectin is a clinically relevant biomarker of mucosal healing in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:93–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Navaneethan U, Parasa S, Venkatesh PG, Trikudanathan G, Shen B (2011) Prevalence and risk factors for colonic perforation during colonoscopy in hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. J Crohns Colitis 5:189–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoepfer AM, Beglinger C, Straumann A, Trummler M, Renzulli P, Seibold F (2009) Ulcerative colitis: correlation of the Rachmilewitz endoscopic activity index with fecal calprotectin, clinical activity, C-reactive protein, and blood leukocytes. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1851–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei SC (2016) Could fecal calprotectin enter mainstream use for diagnosing and monitoring inflammatory bowel disease? Intest Res 14:293–294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lopez RN, Leach ST, Lemberg DA, Duvoisin G, Gearry RB, Day AS (2017) Fecal biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32:577–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zittan E, Kelly OB, Kirsch R, Milgrom R, Burns J, Nguyen GC, Croitoru K, Van Assche G, Silverberg MS, Steinhart AH (2016) Low fecal calprotectin correlates with histological remission and mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis and colonic Crohn;s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 22:623–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim DJ, Jeoun YM, Lee DW, Koo JS, Lee SW (2018) Usefulness of fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin for detection of active ulcerative colitis. Intest Res 16:563–570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lasson A, Stotzer PO, Ohman L, Isaksson S, Sapnara M, Strid H (2015) The intra-individual variability of faecal calprotectin: a prospective study in patients with active ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 9:26–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei SC, Tung CC, Weng MT, Wong JM (2018) Experience of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in using a home fecal calprotectin test as an objective reported outcome for self-monitoring. Intest Res 16:546–553

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P (2006) Laboratory markers in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys? Gut 55:426–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Langhorst J, Boone J, Lauche R, Rueffer A, Dobos G (2016) Faecal lactoferrin, calprotectin, PMN-elastase, CRP, and white blood cell count as indicators for mucosal healing and clinical course of disease in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: post hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial. J Crohns Colitis 10:786–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zilberman L, Maharshak N, Arbel Y, Rogowski O, Rozenblat M, Shapira I, Berliner S, Arber N, Dotan I (2006) Correlated expression of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in relation to disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease: lack of differences between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Digestion 73:205–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magro F, Gionchetti P, Eliakim R, Ardizzone S, Armuzzi A, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Burisch J, Gecse KB, Hart AL, Hindryckx P, Langner C, Limdi JK, Pellino G, Zagorowicz E, Raine T, Harbord M, Rieder F, European Crohn’s Colitis Organisation (2017) Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 1: definitions, diagnosis, extra-intestinal manifestations, pregnancy, cancer surveillance, surgery, and ileo-anal pouch disorders. J Crohns Colitis 11:649–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tysk C, Järnerot G (1992) Ulcerative proctocolitis in Örebro, Sweden: a retrospective epidemiologic study, 1963–1987. Saudi J Gastroenterol 27:945–950

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang SK, Hong WS, Min YI, Kim HY, Yoo JY, Rhee PL, Rhee JC, Chang DK, Song IS, Jung SA, Park EB, Yoo HM, Lee DK, Kim YK (2000) Incidence and prevalence of ulcerative colitis in the Songpa-Kangdong District, Seoul, Korea, 1986-1997. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:1037–1042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walmsley RS, Ayres RC, Pounder RE, Allan RN (1998) A simple clinical colitis activity index. Gut 43:29–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sandborn W, Reinisch W, Rachmilewitz D, Hanauer S, Lichtenstein G, de Villiers W, Olson A, Johanns J, Travers S, Colombel J (2005) Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis: the Act 2 trial. Z Gastroenterol 43:V6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schroeder KW, Tremaine WJ, Ilstrup DM (1987) Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A randomized study. N Engl J Med 317:1625–1629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frøslie KF, Jahnsen J, Moum BA, Vatn MH, Group I (2007) Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: results from a Norwegian population-based cohort. Gastroenterology 133:412–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Velayos FS, Terdiman JP, Walsh JM (2005) Effect of 5-aminosalicylate use on colorectal cancer and dysplasia risk: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1345–1353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tang J, Sharif O, Pai C, Silverman AL (2010) Mesalamine protects against colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 55:1696–1703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meucci G, Fasoli R, Saibeni S, Valpiani D, Gullotta R, Colombo E, D’Inca R, Terpin M, Lombardi G, Ig IBD (2012) Prognostic significance of endoscopic remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis treated with oral and topical mesalazine: a prospective, multicenter study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18:1006–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bitton A, Peppercorn MA, Antonioli DA, Niles JL, Shah S, Bousvaros A, Ransil B, Wild G, Cohen A, Edwardes MDD (2001) Clinical, biological, and histologic parameters as predictors of relapse in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 120:13–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Linskens RK, van Bodegraven AA, Schoorl M, Tuynman HA, Bartels P (2001) Predictive value of inflammatory and coagulation parameters in the course of severe ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci 46:644–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fagan EA, Dyck RF, Maton PN, Hodgson HJ, Chadwick VS, Petrie A, Pepys MB (1982) Serum levels of C-reactive protein in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Eur J Clin Investig 12:351–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pepys MB, Druguet M, Klass HJ, Dash AC, Mirjah DD, Petrie A (1977) Immunological studies in inflammatory bowel disease. CIBA Found Symp 46:283–304

  37. Karoui S, Laz S, Serghini M, Bibani N, Boubaker J, Filali A (2011) Correlation of C-reactive protein with clinical and endoscopic activity in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci 56:1801–1805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hassan EA, Ramadan HK, Ismael AA, Mohamed KF, El-Attar MM, Alhelali I (2017) Noninvasive biomarkers as surrogate predictors of clinical and endoscopic remission after infliximab induction in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis. Saudi J Gastroenterol 23:238–245

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rodgers AD, Cummins AG (2007) CRP correlates with clinical score in ulcerative colitis but not in Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci 52:2063–2068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hart L, Chavannes M, Kherad O, Maedler C, Mourad N, Marcus V, Afif W, Bitton A, Lakatos PL, Brassard P, Bessissow T (2020) Faecal calprotectin predicts endoscopic and histological activity in clinically quiescent ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 14:46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nakov R, Velikova T, Nakov V, Gerova V, Tankova L (2019) Trefoil factor 3 is highly predictive of complete mucosal healing independently and in combination with C-reactive protein in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 28:169–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yoshimura K, Saku A, Karayama M, Inui N, Sugimura H, Suda T (2020) Leucine-rich α2-glycoprotein as a potential biomarker for immune-related colitis after anti–PD-L1 therapy: a report of a case series. Clin Lung Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2020.04.005

  43. Oikonomou K, Kapsoritakis A, Theodoridou C, Karangelis D, Germenis A, Stefanidis I, Potamianos S (2012) Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in inflammatory bowel disease: association with pathophysiology of inflammation, established markers, and disease activity. J Gastroenterol 47:519–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant awarded by the Korean government (MSIP) (no. NRF-2017R1A2B4006767).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J Shin made substantial contribution to the conception and design, data acquisition, analysis, or interpretation and drafted the initial manuscripts, and reviewed and revised the final manuscript. Sung Min Kong and Gyeol Seong contributed to the conception and design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. YH Kim was responsible for the conception and design of the study, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, as well as drafting of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Ho Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 120 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, J., Kong, S.M., Seong, G. et al. What is the appropriate cut-off value of CRP to predict endoscopic remission in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission?. Int J Colorectal Dis 35, 2249–2255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03705-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03705-9

Keywords

Navigation