Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nomograms for morbidity and mortality after oncologic colon resection in the enhanced recovery era: results from a multicentric prospective national study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Predicting postoperative complications and mortality is important to plan the surgical strategy. Different scores have been proposed before to predict them but none of them have been yet implemented into the routine clinical practice because their difficulties and low accuracy with new surgical strategies and enhanced recovery. The main aim of this study is to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality after colonic resection (CR) without protective stomas, in order to develop a comprehensive, up-to-date, simple, reliable, and applicable model for the preoperative assessment of patients with colon cancer.

Methods

Multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 60-day morbidity and mortality. Coefficients derived from the regression model were used in the nomograms to predict morbidity and mortality.

Results

Three thousand one hundred ninety-three patients from 52 hospitals were included into the analysis. Sixty-day postoperative complications rate was 28.3% and the mortality rate was 3%. In multivariable analysis the independent risk factors for postoperative complications were age, male gender, liver and pulmonary diseases, obesity, preoperative albumin, anticoagulant treatment, open surgery, intraoperative complications, and urgent surgery. Independent risk factors for mortality were age, preoperative albumin anticoagulant treatment, and intraoperative complications.

Conclusions

Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after CR for cancer were identified and two easy predictive tools were developed. Both of them could provide important information for preoperative consultation and surgical planning in the time of enhance recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data are available on request.

References

  1. Damle RN, Alavi K (2016) Risk factors for 30-d readmission after colorectal surgery: a systematic review. J Surg Res 200(1):200–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78(3):355–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800780327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whiteley MS, Prytherch DR, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG (1996) An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 83(6):812–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800830628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Menon KV, Farouk R (2002) An analysis of the accuracy of P-POSSUM scoring for mortality risk assessment after surgery for colorectal cancer. Color Dis 4(3):197–200. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00334.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM, Senapati A, Poloniecki JD, Stamatakis JD, Windsor ACJ (2004) Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91(9):1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Horzic M, Kopljar M, Cupurdija K, Bielen DV, Vergles D, Lackovic Z (2007) Comparison of P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scores in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. Arch Surg 142(11):1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.11.1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bromage SJ, Cunliffe WJ (2007) Validation of the CR-POSSUM risk-adjusted scoring system for major colorectal cancer surgery in a single center. Dis Colon Rectum 50(2):192–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-797-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Senagore AJ, Warmuth AJ, Delaney CP, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW (2004) POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States Health Care System for Prediction of Outcome for Colon Cancer Resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10350-004-0604-1

  9. Vather R, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Adegbola S, Hill AG (2006) Comparison of the Possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 76(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1445-2197.2006.03875.X

  10. Leung E, Ferjani AM, Stellard N, Wong LS (2009) Predicting post-operative mortality in patients undergoing colorectal surgery using P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores: a prospective study. Int J Color Dis 24(12):1459–1464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0781-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ren L, Upadhyay AM, Wang L, Li L, Lu J, Fu W (2009) Mortality rate prediction by physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM and the development of new scoring systems in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. Am J Surg 198(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richards CH, Leitch FE, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2010) A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14(10):1511–1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1333-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards CH, Leitch EF, Anderson JH, McKee RF, McMillan DC, Horgan PG (2011) The revised ACPGBI model is a simple and accurate predictor of operative mortality after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(13). https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-011-1805-1

  14. Risk Prediction in Surgery - www.riskprediction.org.uk. http://www.riskprediction.org.uk/. Accessed April 3, 2020

  15. Tekkis PP, Poloniecki JD, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD (2003) Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national study. BMJ. 327(7425):1196–1201. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chandra A, Mangam S, Marzouk D (2009) A review of risk scoring systems utilised in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 13(8):1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0857-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagnall NM, Pring ET, Malietzis G, Athanasiou T, Faiz OD, Kennedy RH, Jenkins JT (2018) Perioperative risk prediction in the era of enhanced recovery: a comparison of POSSUM, ACPGBI, and E-PASS scoring systems in major surgical procedures of the colorectal surgeon. Int J Color Dis 33(11):1627–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3141-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Ramos Rodríguez JL et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after Colon resection for Cancer. Ann Surg 262(2):321–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet (London, England) 370(9596):1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley. https://books.google.es/books/about/Applied_Logistic_Regression.html?id=Po0RLQ7USIMC&redir_esc=y. Accessed April 4, 2020

  21. Merkow RP, Hall BL, Cohen ME, Dimick JB, Wang E, Chow WB, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2012) Relevance of the C-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 214(5):822–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S, Puhan MA, Muller MK, Hahnloser D, Hauri D, Graf R, Clavien PA (2011) The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures. Ann Surg 254(6):907–913. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821d4a43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murray AC, Mauro C, Rein J, Kiran RP (2016) 30-day mortality after elective colorectal surgery can reasonably be predicted. Tech Coloproctol 20(8):567–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1503-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Mantion G, Mantion G (2005) Mortality and morbidity after surgery of mid and low rectal cancer. Results of a French prospective multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29(5):509–514 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15980743. Accessed January 18, 2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pucciarelli S, Zorzi M, Gennaro N, Gagliardi G, Restivo A, Saugo M, Barina A, Rugge M, Zuin M, Maretto I, Nitti D (2017) In-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of hospital stay after surgery for primary colorectal cancer: A national population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(7):1312–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.03.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Riley R, Holman C, Fletcher D (2014) Inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status classification in a sample of anaesthetists in Western Australia. Anaesth Intensive Care 42(5):614–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X1404200511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aronson WL, McAuliffe MS, Miller K (2003) Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification Scale. AANA J 71(4):265–274 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13677221. Accessed April 3, 2020

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chijiiwa K, Yamaguchi K, Yamashita H, Ogawa Y, Yoshida J, Tanaka M (1996) ASA physical status and age are not factors predicting morbidity, mortality, and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am Surg 62(9):701–705 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8751758.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101(4):424–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Munro A, Brown M, Niblock P, Steele R, Carey F (2015) Do multidisciplinary team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience. BMC Cancer 15:686. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1683-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hendren S, Morris AM, Zhang W, Dimick J (2011) Early discharge and hospital readmission after colectomy for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54(11):1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822b72d3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kelly M, Sharp L, Dwane F, Kelleher T, Comber H (2012) Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay and readmission after colorectal resection: a population-based study of elective and emergency admissions. BMC Health Serv Res 12:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-77

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Salvans S, Gil-Egea MJ, Pera M et al (2013) Multimodal rehabilitation programme in elective colorectal surgery: impact on hospital costs. Cirugía Española (Eng Ed) 91(10):638–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2014.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sancho-Muriel J, Frasson M, Hervás D, Flor-Lorente B, Ramos Rodriguez JL, Romero Simó M, Escoll Rufino J, Santamaría Olabarrieta M, Viñas Martinez J, López Bañeres M, García-Granero E, ANACO Study Group (2017) Standard outcome indicators after colon cancer resection. Creation of a nomogram for autoevaluation. Cir Esp 95(1):30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2016.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Takeda for sponsoring the creation and maintenance of the study’s on-line database, without interfering with data collection, analysis, and conclusions of the study. *Investigators of the ANACO (Spanish study on ANAstomotic leak after COlon resection for cancer) study group: Rico MA Alvarez, Complejo Universitario de Burgos, Burgos; Brao MJ García, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña; JM Sanchez Gonzalez, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife; Mariela M. Braithwaite, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; E. Martı´ Martínez, Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia; JA. Álvarez Pérez, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo; A. Espí, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia; M. Trallero Anoro, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia; M. Millán Scheiding, Hospital Universitario Bellvitge, Barcelona; O. Maseda Díaz, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo; P. Dujovne Lindenbaum, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón; A. Monzón Abad, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza; M. Romero Simó, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante; J. Escoll Rufino, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida; M. Santamaría Olabarrieta, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao; J. Viñas Martínez, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol; M. Lopez Bañaeres, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia; I. Blesa Sierra, Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas, Almería; F. Feliú Villaró, Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII, Tarragona; J. Aguiló Lucía, Hospital Lluis Alcanyis, Játiva; J. Bargallo Berzosa, Hospital de Terrassa, Terrassa; N. Alonso Hernández, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca; FJ. Labrador Vallverdú, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara; PA. Parra Baños, HGU Reina Sofía, Murcia; G. Ais Conde, Hospital General de Segovia, Segovia; R. Farres, Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta, Girona; J. Hernandis Villalba, Hospital General de Elda, Elda; C. Álvarez Laso, Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijón; S. Martínez Alcaide, Hospital de La Ribera, Alcira; MN. Cáceres Alvarado, Hospital do Meixoeiro, Vigo; I. Rey Simó, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña; J. Montero García, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers; A. García Fadrique, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia; V. Aguilella Diago, HCU Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; J. García Septiem, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe; J. García García, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca; L. Ponchietti, Hospital de Torrevieja, Torrevieja; MS. Carceller Navarro, Hospital de Manises, Valencia; M. Ramos Fernández, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella; R. Conde Muiño, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada; D. Huerga Álvarez, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada; P. Menéndez Sánchez, Hospital Gutiérrez Ortega, Valdepeñas; C. Maristany Bienert, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa; MT. García Martínez, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo; C. Moreno Muzas, Hospital Obisco Polanco, Teruel; C. Pastor Idoate, Fundación Jiménez-Díaz, Madrid; A. Andicoechea, Hospital de Jove, Gijón; AP. Alonso Casado, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid; JV. Roig Vila, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia; I. Goded Broto, Hospital San Jorge, Huesca; P. Collera, Complejo Asistencial y Universitario de Manresa, Manresa; A. Arroyo Sebastián, Hospital General de Elche, Elche.

Funding

The authors thank Takeda for sponsoring the creation and maintenance of the study’s on-line database, without interfering with data collection, analysis and conclusions of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Data acquisition: Sánchez-Guillén, Frasson, Fornes-Ferrer, Ramos, Flor-Lorente, García-Granero, Pellino, Blesa, Jiménez. Moya, García-Granero. Drafting of manuscript: Sánchez-Guillén, Frasson. Critical revision of manuscript: García-Granero, Flor-Lorente, García-Granero.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Frasson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The protocol was approved initially by the Ethical Committee of the Hospital Universitario de Getafe (Madrid, Spain) and then by the Ethical Committees of each participating hospital.

Consent to participate

The study was explained to the patients who met the inclusion criteria and they were asked to sign a written informed consent.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the paper.

Code availability

The statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 22.0.0; IBM SPSS statistics, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) was used for the descriptive and univariable analyses. The R software (version 3.4.1) was used for the logistic regression, the cross-validation of the model, and to build the nomograms (“rms” package).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Meeting presentation: The following article was presented as Oral Presentation in the AECP meeting 2017 (Almería, May 2017), ESCP Congress 2017 (Berlin, September 2017) and AEC meeting 2017 (Malaga, October 2017).

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PNG 43.6 kb)

ESM 2

(PNG 47.6 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez-Guillén, L., Frasson, M., Pellino, G. et al. Nomograms for morbidity and mortality after oncologic colon resection in the enhanced recovery era: results from a multicentric prospective national study. Int J Colorectal Dis 35, 2227–2238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03692-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03692-x

Keywords

Navigation