Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intra-versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis of 3699 patients

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) has become a gold standard. However, a major current concern is still whether anastomosis should be performed extracorporeally or entirely laparoscopically. This meta-analysis assesses and compares peri- and postoperative outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) versus extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in LRC.

Methods

The research used the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies comparing IA with EA during LRC. Our main endpoint was parietal abscess. Secondary endpoints were 30-day morbidity, mortality, time to onset of gas and stools, length of stay, number of lymph nodes removed and postoperative incisional hernia rates. The MINORS criteria were used to evaluate the quality of the studies examined.

Results

Twenty-four articles comprising 3699 patients, published between 2004 and 2020, were included in this meta-analysis. After sensitivity analysis, IA was associated with a decrease in parietal abscesses (OR 0.526, IC 0.333–0.832, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis finds that IA allows a decrease in parietal abscesses and time to first gas and stools, surgical repair and length of stay, with similar overall complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960 143(8):762–767 discussion 768

    Google Scholar 

  2. Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E, Delrio P, Bucci L, Ferulano GP et al (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc 29(8):2314–2320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Senagore A, Delaney C, Brady K, Fazio V (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg. 199(5):675–679

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu Q, Jin C, Hu T, Wei M, Wang Z (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(4):348–357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinek L, You K, Giuratrabocchetta S, Gachabayov M, Lee K, Bergamaschi R (2018) Does laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis decreases surgical site infection rate? A propensity score-matched cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(3):291–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Milone M, Elmore U, Vignali A, Gennarelli N, Manigrasso M, Burati M, Milone F, de Palma GD, Delrio P, Rosati R (2018) Recovery after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403(1):1–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(9):1177–1186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ricci C, Casadei R, Alagna V, Zani E, Taffurelli G, Pacilio CA, Minni F (2017) A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(3):417–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W, Schoonmade L, Sietses C, Meijerink J, Tuynman J (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31(1):64–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Guarino S, Desiderio J, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Slim K (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy - systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22(1):1–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carnuccio P, Jimeno J, Parés D (2014) Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctology 18(1):5–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Emile SH (2020) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy; earlier recovery, less complications, and more: intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis in lap right colectomy. Br J Surg 107(5):614–614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13(3):312–317

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fabozzi M, Allieta R, Brachet Contul R, Grivon M, Millo P, Lale-Murix E et al (2010) Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 24(9):2085–2091

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scatizzi M, Kröning KC, Borrelli A, Andan G, Lenzi E, Feroci F (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study. World J Surg 34(12):2902–2908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaves JA, Idoate CP, Fons JB, Oliver MB, Rodríguez NP, Delgado AB et al (2011) A case-control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Cirugia Espanola 89(1):24–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anania G, Santini M, Scagliarini L, Marzetti A, Vedana L, Marino S, Gregorio C, Resta G, Cavallesco G (2012) A totally mini-invasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 18(29):3869–3874

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Roscio F, Bertoglio C, De Luca A, Frattini P, Scandroglio I (2012) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int J Surg Lond Engl 10(6):290–295

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee KH, Ho J, Akmal Y, Nelson R, Pigazzi A (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 27(6):1986–1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Magistro C, Lernia SD, Ferrari G, Zullino A, Mazzola M, De Martini P et al (2013) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term outcomes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center. Surg Endosc 27(7):2613–2618

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marchesi F, Pinna F, Percalli L, Cecchini S, Riccó M, Costi R, Pattonieri V, Roncoroni L (2013) Totally laparoscopic right colectomy: theoretical and practical advantages over the laparo-assisted approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(5):418–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Erguner I, Aytac E, Baca B, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T (2013) Total laparoscopic approach for the treatment of right colon cancer: a technical critique. Asian J Surg 36(2):58–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanna MH, Hwang GS, Phelan MJ, Bui T-L, Carmichael JC, Mills SD, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30(9):3933–3942

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro R, Keler U, Segev L, Sarna S, Hatib K, Hazzan D (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30(9):3823–3829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vergis AS, Steigerwald SN, Bhojani FD, Sullivan PA, Hardy KM (2015) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastamosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Can J Surg J Can Chir 58(1):63–68

    Google Scholar 

  27. Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F, di Marino M, Ricci F, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Parisi A (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1512–1521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jian-Cheng T, Shu-Sheng W, Bo Z, Jian F, Liang Z (2016) Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: an evaluation of short-term outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(48):e5538

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vignali A, Bissolati M, De Nardi P, Di Palo S, Staudacher C (2016) Extracorporeal vs intracorporeal ileocolic stapled anastomoses in laparoscopic right colectomy: an interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(5):343–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Biondi A, Santocchi P, Pennestrì F, Santullo F, D’Ugo D, Persiani R (2017) Totally laparoscopic right colectomy versus laparoscopically assisted right colectomy: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 31(12):5275–5282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bollo J, Salas P, Martinez MC, Hernandez P, Rabal A, Carrillo E, Targarona E (2018) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy assisted by laparoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(11):1635–1641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kwiatkowski AP, Stępińska G, Stanowski E, Paśnik K, Janik MR (2019) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy – single center experience. Videosurgery Miniinvasive Tech 14(3):381–386

    Google Scholar 

  33. Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA, Arezzo A, Mistrangelo M, Passera R, Morino M (2019) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal Ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 270(5):762–767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Trépanier M, Valin-Thorburn A, Kouyoumdjian A, Dumitra T, Alhashemi M, Kaneva P, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for right colectomy does not affect gastrointestinal recovery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Surg Endosc. 23 2019

  35. Bou Saleh N, Voron T, De’Angelis N, Franco I, Canoui-Poitrine F, Mutter D et al (2020) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: results from the CLIMHET study group. Tech Coloproctology

  36. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25(4):1031–1036

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lindmark M, Strigård K, Löwenmark T, Dahlstrand U, Gunnarsson U (2018) Risk factors for surgical complications in ventral hernia repair. World J Surg 42(11):3528–3536

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Samia H, Lawrence J, Nobel T, Stein S, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2013) Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline? Am J Surg 205(3):264–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon rectum 43(3):326–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Owen RM, Perez SD, Lytle N, Patel A, Davis SS, Lin E, Sweeney JF (2013) Impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Surg Endosc 27(10):3555–3563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Parés D, Shamali A, Stefan S, Flashman K, O’Leary D, Conti J, Senapati A, Parvaiz A, Khan J (2016) Predictive factors for extraction site hernia after laparoscopic right colectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(7):1323–1328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jenks PJ, Laurent M, McQuarry S, Watkins R (2014) Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection (SSI) and predicted financial consequences of elimination of SSI from an English hospital. J Hosp Infect 86(1):24–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Aiolfi A, Bona D, Guerrazzi G, Bonitta G, Rausa E, Panizzo V, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2020 [cité 4 avr 2020]; Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0693

  45. Parthasarathy M, Greensmith M, Bowers D, Groot-Wassink T (2017) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis of 17 518 patients. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 19(3):288–298

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Selvy.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selvy, M., Mattevi, C., Slim, K. et al. Intra-versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis of 3699 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 35, 1673–1680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03675-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03675-y

Keywords

Navigation