Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography scanning for preoperative staging of colonic cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

With an increasing demand for more accurate preoperative staging methods for colon cancer, we aimed to compare preoperative tumour (T)- and nodal (N)-stage in patients with left-sided colon cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) with post-operative histology as gold standard.

Methods

A total of 44 patients were prospectively recruited at Herlev and Roskilde University Hospitals during November 2014–January 2016. Thirty-five patients were included in the final analysis and underwent EUS, CT and surgery within 2 weeks. Diagnostic values were evaluated for “low risk” (T1+T2+T3 with ≤5 mm extramural invasion) and “high risk” (T3 with >5 mm of extramural spread + T4) colonic cancer.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity in “low risk” colonic cancer evaluated with EUS was 0.90 [0.74;0.98] and 0.75 [0.19;0.99] and with CT 0.96 [0.80;0.99] and 0.25 [<0.01;0.81]. EUS and CT were poor in predicting N0 or N+ disease.

Conclusions

The sensitivity of EUS and CT were good and comparable regarding T-stage evaluation, while EUS had a significantly higher specificity in the evaluation of “low risk” tumours. The results obtained for “high risk” colonic cancer were difficult to evaluate due to small patient numbers. EUS could be considered as a supplement to CT scans in selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapies, or local transmural treatment, in the future.

Trial registration

NCT02324023

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL et al (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. Cancer J Clin 65:87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith NJ, Bees N, Barbachano Y et al (2007) Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96:1030–1036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Foxtrot Collaborative Group (2012) Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:1152–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter C, Blake H, Jeyadevan N et al Local staging and assessment of colon cancer with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. doi:10.1259/bjr.20160257

  5. Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M (2007) Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 17:379–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML et al (2009) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1255–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Reddy JBK et al (2009) How good is endoscopic ultrasound in differentiating various T stages of rectal cancer? Meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:254–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rollvén E, Holm T, Glimelius B et al (2013) Potentials of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for preoperative local staging of colon cancer. Acta Radiol 54:722–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kongkam P, Linlawan S, Aniwan S et al (2014) Forward-viewing radial-array echoendoscope for staging of colon cancer beyond the rectum. World J Gastroenterol 20:2681–2687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Malmstrøm ML, Săftoiu A, Vilmann P et al (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound for staging of colonic cancer proximal to the rectum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 5:307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE et al (1997) AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th edn. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gersak MM, Badea R, Graur F et al (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound for the characterization and staging of rectal cancer. Current state of the method. Technological advances and perspectives. Med Ultrason 17:227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beck DE, Wexner SD, Hull T et al (2014) The ASCRS manual of colon and rectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Ingeholm P, Gögenur I, Iversen LH (2016) Danish colorectal cancer group database. Clin Epidemiol 8:465–468

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dighe S, Swift I, Brown G (2008) CT staging of colon cancer. Clin Radiol 63:1372–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dighe S, Swift I, Magill L et al (2012) Accuracy of radiological staging in identifying high-risk colon cancer patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicentre experience. Color Dis 14:438–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jepsen RK, Ingeholm P, Lund EL (2012) Upstaging of early colorectal cancers following improved lymph node yield after methylene blue injection. Histopathology 61:788–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. World Medical Association (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310:2191–2194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ; DOI: 10. 1136/bmj.h5527

  20. Hunter C, Brown G (2016) Pre-operative staging of rectal cancer: a review of imaging techniques. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol May 10:1011–1025

  21. Badea R, Gersak MM, Dudea SM et al (2015) Characterization and staging of rectal tumors: endoscopic ultrasound versus MRI/CT. Pictorial essay Med Ultrason 17:241–247

  22. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fröhlich E, Muller R, Cui X-W et al (2015) Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion. J Ultrasound Med 34:179–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Akbari RP, Wong WD (2003) Endorectal ultrasound and the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Scand J Surg 92:25–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pasquali S, Yim G, Vohra RS et al Survival after neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone for resectable esophageal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA. 0000000000001905

  26. Richter-Schrag H-J, Walker C, Thimme R et al (2016) Full thickness resection device (FTRD). Experience and outcome for benign neoplasms of the rectum and colon. Der Chir Zeitschrift für alle Gebiete der Oper Medizen 87:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Toh E-W, Brown P, Morris E et al (2015) Area of submucosal invasion and width of invasion predicts lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 58:393–400

  28. Lascarides C, Buscaglia JM, Denoya PI et al (2016) Laparoscopic right colectomy vs laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis 18:1050–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank project nurses Louise Rasmussen, Helle Kaels and Julia Lyhne Fiehn and secretary Anette Eildal from Herlev Hospital as well as project nurse Helle Buck Rasmussen and secretary Bettina Nissen Ravn Appelsø from Roskilde Hospital for great work and enthusiasm. A thanks also to all involved doctors at both Roskilde and Herlev Hospitals, introducing the projects to the patients at primary admission and to the staff at the endoscopy unit at Herlev Hospital. A special thanks to Roald Flesland Havre, a visiting consultant from Bergen, Norway, and to radiographer Ulrik Jermiin Frost from Herlev Hospital, for technical CT assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ML Malmstrøm.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study was funded by Agnes and Poul Friis Fund, Astrid Thaysens Legat, Axel Muusfeldts Fund, Dansk Medicinsk Selskab, Krista and Viggo Petersens Fund, Arvid Nilssons Fund, Director Jacob Madsens and wife Olga Madsens Fund, Director Svend Espersens Fund, Lykfeldts Fund, Harboefonden and the Research Councils of Herlev and Køge Hospitals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malmstrøm, M., Gögenur, I., Riis, L. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography scanning for preoperative staging of colonic cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 813–820 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2820-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2820-x

Keywords

Navigation