Skip to main content
Log in

The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors extending to the dentate line

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is becoming the mainstay of the treatment strategies, rather than surgical treatment, for colorectal tumors extending to the dentate line, ESD is technically more difficult. This study was aimed at assessing the usefulness of ESD for the treatment of colorectal tumors extending to the dentate line.

Methods

This study included 531 patients with colorectal tumors who underwent colorectal ESD between 2008 and 2015. They were divided into three groups: rectal tumors extending to the dentate line (anorectal group), those not extending to the dentate line (proximal rectal group), and colonic tumors (colonic group), and a retrospective comparative analysis was carried out.

Results

Of the total patients, 18 (3.4%) had lesions extending to the dentate line area. The procedure times were 103.4 ± 84.0, 80.4 ± 64.3, and 71.8 ± 52.3 min, respectively (P = 0.0318). All the patients in the anorectal group were operated by operators who had performed at least 20 colorectal ESDs (P < 0.0001). No significant difference among the three groups was found in the en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, or curative resection rate. Although no significant difference in the incidence of perforation was observed among the three groups, intraoperative bleeding was observed in 61% of the patients in the anorectal group (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

ESD is an effective treatment strategy for colorectal tumors extending to the dentate line. However, it seems that anorectal ESD, which is technically more difficult than colorectal ESD, should be performed by operators with ample experience in performing ESD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamazaki K, Saito Y, Fukuzawa M (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large laterally spreading tumor in the rectum is a minimally invasive treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:e5–e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N et al (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 39:418–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Toyonaga T, Man-i M, Chinzei R et al (2010) Endoscopic treatment for early stage colorectal tumors: the comparison between EMR with small incision, simplified ESD, and ESD using the standard flush knife and the ball tipped flush knife. Acta Chir Iugosl 57:41–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hotta K, Yamaguchi Y, Saito Y et al (2012) Current opinions for endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors from our experiences: indications, technical aspects and complications. Dig Endosc 24:110–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V et al (2011) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:1042–1049

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobayashi N, Yoshitake N, Hirahara Y et al (2012) Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:728–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Imai K, Hotta K, Yamaguchi Y et al (2015) Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of rectal tumors extending to the dentate line. Endoscopy 47:529–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duthie HL, Gairns FW (1960) Sensory nerve-endings and sensation in the anal region of man. Br J Surg 47:585–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Antillon MR, Bartalos CR, Miller ML et al (2008) En bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection of a 14-cm laterally spreading adenoma of the rectum with involvement to the anal canal: expanding the frontiers of endoscopic surgery (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 67:332–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakadoi K, Tanaka S, Hayashi N et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumor close to the dentate line. Gastrointest Endosc 76:444–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 43:641–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S et al (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39:534–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsumoto A, Tanaka S, Oba S et al (2010) Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 45:1329–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I et al (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 66:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Toyonaga T, Man-i M, Fujita T et al (2010) Retrospective study of technical aspects and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissectionfor laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Endoscopy 42:714–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Probst A, Ebigbo A, Märkl B, et al. (2016) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal neoplasia: experience from a European center. Endoscopy 2016 Nov 14.

  17. Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Matsuda T et al (2011) Comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection with transanal resection for non-invasive rectal tumor: a retrospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:1028–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakamoto GD, MacKeigan JM, Senagore AJ (1991) Transanal excision of large, rectal villous adenomas. Dis Colon rectum 34:880–885

  19. Winburn GB (1998) Surgical resection of villous adenomas of the rectum. Am Surg 64:1170–1173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamaru Y, Oka S, Tanaka S et al (2015) Early squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Case Rep Gastroenterol 9:120–125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Fukunaga S, Nakajima T, Matsuda T (2011) Learning curve associated with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for endoscopists experienced in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dis Colon rectum 54:1307–1312

  22. Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Goto O, Kodashima S, Koike K (2012) Safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by the trainee endoscopists. Dig Endosc 24:154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T et al (2010) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:302–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohata K, Ito T, Chiba H, Tsuji Y, Matsuhashi N (2012) Effective training system in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 24:84–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Iacopini F, Bella A, Costamagna G et al (2012) Stepwise training in rectal and colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection with differentiated learning curves. Gastrointest Endosc 76:1188–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Li JC, Lo AW (2010) In vitro porcine training model for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: an inexpensive and safe way to acquire a complex endoscopic technique. Surg Endosc 24:2439–2443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchez-Yague A, Yamaguchi Y, Takao T et al (2011) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a lower rectal polyp proximal to the dentate line by using local lidocaine injection. Gastrointest Endosc 73:405–407

Download references

Author contributions

Conception and design: SM; analysis and interpretation of the data: SM; drafting of the article: SM; critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: HM; final approval of the article: SM and HM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satohiro Matsumoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethical consideration

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by The Etiological Study Ethical Review Board of Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsumoto, S., Mashima, H. The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors extending to the dentate line. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 831–837 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2775-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2775-y

Keywords

Navigation