Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The RIPASA score is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a western population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The definitive diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) requires histopathological examination. Various clinical diagnostic scoring systems attempt to reduce negative appendectomy rates. The most commonly used in Western Europe and the USA is the Alvarado score. The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha appendicitis (RIPASA) score achieves better sensitivity and specificity in Asian and Middle Eastern populations. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the RIPASA score in Irish patients with AA.

Methods

All patients who presented to our institution with right iliac fossa pain and clinically suspected AA between January 1 and December 31, 2015, were indentified from our hospital inpatient enquiry database and retrospectively studied. Operating theatre records and histology reports confirmed those who underwent a non-elective operative procedure and the presence or absence of AA. SPSS version 22 was used for statistical analysis. Standard deviation is provided where appropriate.

Results

Two hundred eight patients were included in the study (106/51% male, mean age 22.7 ± 9.2 years). One hundred thirty-five (64.9%) had histologically confirmed AA (mean symptom duration = 36.19 ± 15.90 h). At a score ≥7.5, the previously determined score most likely associated with AA in Eastern populations, the RIPASA scoring system demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.39%, specificity of 69.86%, positive predictive value of 84.06%, negative predictive value of 72.86% and diagnostic accuracy of 80% in our cohort.

Conclusion

The RIPASA score is a useful tool to aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the Irish population. A score of ≥7.5 provides sensitivity and specificity exceeding that previously documented for the Alvarado score in Western populations.

What does this paper add to the literature?

This is the first study evaluating the utility of the RIPASA score in predicting acute appendicitis in a Western population. At a value of 7.5, a cut-off score suggestive of appendicitis in the Eastern population, RIPASA demonstrated a high-sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy in our cohort and was more accurate than the commonly used Alvarado score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Akbar F, Yousuf M, Morgan RJ, Maw A (2010) Changing management of suspected appendicitis in the laparoscopic era. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:65–68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan MNS, Zarina M et al (2012) Epidemiological observation on appendicitis in Peshawar, Pakistan. Pak J Surg 28:30–33

    Google Scholar 

  3. Memon ZA, Irfan S, Fatima K, Iqbal MS, Sami W (2013) Acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system. Asian J Surg 36:144–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nshuti R, Kruger D, Luvhengo TE (2014) Clinical presentation of acute appendicitis in adults at the Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital. Int J Emerg Med 7:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Akram H, Siddiqui ZR (2013) Appendicitis in a malrotated gut: an unusual cause of left upper quadrant abdominal pain. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 23:665–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan AHW, Amjad A et al (2013) Role of modified Alvarado score in diagnosis acute appendicitis in emergency setup. Esculapio 9:58–61

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jalil A, Shah SA, Saaiq M, Zubair M, Riaz U, Habib Y (2011) Alvarado scoring system in prediction of acute appendicitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 21:753–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akhtar W, Ali S, Arshad M, Ali FN, Nadeem N (2011) Focused abdominal CT scan for acute appendicitis in children: can it help in need? J Pak Med Assoc 61:474–476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khalil OA (2013), Using of the modified RIPAS score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis to decrease use of abdominal computed tomography. Egyptian J Surg 2013; 32(2):86–90.

  10. Alkhuzaie JJ-A-M, Buchery A et al (2013) Could preoperative ultrasound examination improve the final outcome of appendectomies? Bahrain Med Bull 3:35

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bachur RG, Hennelly K, Callahan MJ, Chen C, Monuteaux MC (2012) Diagnostic imaging and negative appendectomy rates in children: effects of age and gender. Pediatrics 129:877–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15:557–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohle R, O'Reilly F, O'Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD (2011) The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med 9:139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Siddique RKT, Shah S (2011) A new simple scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Stud 1:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chong CF, Adi MI, Thien A et al (2010) Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singap Med J 51:220–225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan I, Bicknell SG, Graham M (2005) Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting appendicitis in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1809–1812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Samad AKB, Khanzada TW et al (2009) Appropriate cut-off value of Alvarado scores for patients undergoing appendectomy at Isra University Hospital, Hyderabad. Isra Med J 1:236–239

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A, Koepsell T (2005) Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg 201:933–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanumba EMJ, Rambau P et al (2011) Modified Alvardo scoring system as a diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis at Bugando Medical Center, Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Surg 2:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shah NIM, Sabir I et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination 26 versus combination of abdominal ultrasound and Alvarado score in patients with acute appendicitis. JPMI 22:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jones PF (1976) Active observation in management of acute abdominal pain in childhood. Br Med J 2:551–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Limpawattanasiri C (2011) Alvarado score for the acute appendicitis in a provincial hospital. J Med Assoc Thail 94:441–449

    Google Scholar 

  24. Velanovich V, Satava R (1992) Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg 58:264–269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Siddique KBP, Bhandari S et al (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of white cell count and C-reactive protein for assessing the severity of paediatric appendicitis. JRSM 2:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Singh K, Chitrangada K (2014) Comparative study of diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. IOSR-JDMS 13:36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wade DS, Marrow SE, Balsara ZN, Burkhard TK, Goff WB (1993) Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon's clinical impression. Arch Surg 128:1039–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nasiri S, Mohebbi F, Sodagari N, Hedayat A (2012) Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the modified Alvarado scoring system in acute appendicitis. Int J Emerg Med 5:26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Toprak H, Kilincaslan H, Ahmad IC et al (2014) Integration of ultrasound findings with Alvarado score in children with suspected appendicitis. Pediatr Int 56:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB et al (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dey S, Mohanta PK, Baruah AK, Kharga B, Bhutia KL, Singh VK (2010) Alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis—a clinicopathological correlation. Indian J Surg 72:290–293

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Abdeldaim Y, Mahmood S, Mc AD (2007) The Alvarado score as a tool for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ir Med J 100:342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kollar D, McCartan DP, Bourke M, Cross KS, Dowdall J (2015) Predicting acute appendicitis? A comparison of the Alvarado score, the appendicitis inflammatory response score and clinical assessment. World J Surg 39:104–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chong CF, Thien A, Mackie AJ et al (2011) Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singap Med J 52:340–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Butt MQ, Chatha SS, Ghumman AQ, Farooq M (2014) RIPASA score: a new diagnostic score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 24:894–897

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wani M, Yousaf M, Khan M, BabaAbdul A, Durrani M, Wani M, Shafi M (2006) Usefulness of the Alvarado scoring system with respect to age, sex and time of presentation, with regression analysis of individual parameters. The Internet Journal of Surgery 11:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alnjadat I, Abdallah B (2013) Alvarado versus RIPASA score in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Rawal Med J 38:147–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, St. Luke’s Hospital, Kilkenny, Ireland

    Muhammad Usman Malik, Faisal Awan, Frederik Pretorius, Constantino Fiuza-Castineira, Osama El Faedy & Paul Balfe

  2. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland

    Tara M. Connelly

Authors
  1. Muhammad Usman Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tara M. Connelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Faisal Awan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frederik Pretorius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Constantino Fiuza-Castineira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Osama El Faedy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Paul Balfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara M. Connelly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, M.U., Connelly, T.M., Awan, F. et al. The RIPASA score is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a western population. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 491–497 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2713-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2713-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation