Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A trial of radiofrequency ablation for anal intraepithelial neoplasia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) effectively treats esophageal high-grade dysplasia, but its efficacy in treating anal canal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) is unsubstantiated. This prospective study assessed the safety and efficacy of applying hemi-circumferential RFA to anal canal HSIL.

Methods

Twenty-one HIV-negative participants with HSIL occupying ≤ half the anal canal circumference were treated with hemi-circumferential anal canal RFA. Participants were assessed every 3 months for 12 months with high-resolution anoscopy; recurrence in the treatment zone was re-treated with focal RFA.

Results

Twenty-one participants with a mean of 1.7 lesions (range 1–4) enrolled and completed the trial. Six (29 %) participants had recurrent HSIL within the treated hemi-circumference within 1 year. Four participants (19 %) had persistence of an index lesion at 3 months. One (2.9 %) index HSIL persisted again at 12 months. No participants had more than two RFA treatments. KM curve-predicted HSIL-free survival within the treatment zone at 1 year was 76 % (95 % CI 52–89 %). Comparing the first 7 and last 14 participants, the predicted 1-year HSIL-free survivals are 43 % (95 % CI 10–73 %) and 93 % (95 % CI 59–99 %), respectively (p = 0.008), suggesting a learning curve with the treating physician. Multivariable analysis showed decreased recurrence in the last 14 participants (HR 0.02; 95 % CI 0.001–0.63) while increasing BMI increased recurrence (HR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.01–2.01). No participants had device or procedure-related serious adverse events, anal stricture, or heavy bleeding.

Conclusions

Hemi-circumferential RFA yielded a high rate of anal HSIL eradication in HIV-negative patients at 1 year with minimal adverse events. Lesion persistence was probably related to incomplete initial ablation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/analcancer/detailedguide/anal-cancer-what-is-key-statistics. Accessed February 28, 2016.

  2. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/anus.html. Accessed February 28, 2016.

  3. Schiffman M, Kjaer SK (2003) Chapter 2: natural history of anogenital human papillomavirus infection and neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 31:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zbar AP, Fenger C, Efron J et al (2002) The pathology and molecular biology of anal intraepithelial neoplasia: comparisons with cervical and vulvar intraepithelial carcinoma. Int J Color Dis 17:203–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Apgar BS, Kittendorf AL, Bettcher CM et al (2009) Update on ASCCP consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical screening tests and cervical histology. Am Fam Physician 80:147–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gervaz P, Hahnloser D, Wolff BG et al (2004) Molecular biology of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: a comparison of HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. J Gastrointest Surg 8:1024–1030 discussion 31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jay N, Berry JM, Hogeboom CJ et al (1997) Colposcopic appearance of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions: relationship to histopathology. Dis Colon rectum 40:919–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tate DR, Anderson RJ (2002) Recrudescence of cervical dysplasia among women who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: a case-control analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:880–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html. Accessed February 28, 2016.

  10. Stier EA, Goldstone SE, Berry JM et al (2008) Infrared coagulator treatment of high-grade anal dysplasia in HIV-infected individuals: an AIDS malignancy consortium pilot study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 47:56–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scholefield JH, Ogunbiyi OA, Smith JH et al (1994) Treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Surg 81:1238–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyons M, Francis N, Allen-Mersh TG (1999) Treatment of grade 3 anal intraepithelial neoplasia by complete anal mucosal excision without fecal diversion: report of a case. Dis Colon rectum 42:1342–1344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pehoushek J, Smith KJ (2001) Imiquimod and 5 % fluorouracil therapy for anal and perianal squamous cell carcinoma in situ in an HIV-1-positive man. Arch Dermatol 137:14–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamdan KA, Tait IS, Nadeau V et al (2003) Treatment of grade III anal intraepithelial neoplasia with photodynamic therapy: report of a case. Dis Colon rectum 46:1555–1559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacey CJ (2005) Therapy for genital human papillomavirus-related disease. J Clin Virol 32(Suppl 1):S82–S90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstone SE, Johnstone AA, Moshier EL (2014) Long-term outcome of ablation of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: recurrence and incidence of cancer. Dis Colon rectum 57:316–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pineda CE, Berry JM, Jay N et al (2008) High-resolution anoscopy targeted surgical destruction of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon rectum 51:829–835 35-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldstone RN, Goldstone AB, Russ J, Goldstone SE (2011) Long-term follow-up of infrared coagulator ablation of anal high-grade dysplasia in men who have sex with men. Dis Colon rectum 54:1284–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marks DK, Goldstone SE (2012) Electrocautery ablation of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-negative and HIV-positive men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 59:259–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weis SE, Vecino I, Pogoda JM, Susa JS (2012) Treatment of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia with infrared coagulation in a primary care population of HIV-infected men and women. Dis Colon rectum 55:1236–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Richel O, de Vries HJ, van Noesel CJ et al (2013) Comparison of imiquimod, topical fluorouracil, and electrocautery for the treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14:346–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Basu KK, Pick B, Bale R et al (2002) Efficacy and one year follow up of argon plasma coagulation therapy for ablation of Barrett’s oesophagus: factors determining persistence and recurrence of Barrett’s epithelium. Gut 51:776–780

  23. Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF et al (2009) Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med 360:2277–2288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. American Gastroenterological Association, Spechler SJ, Sharma P et al (2011) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 140:1084–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Evans JA, Early DS et al (2012) The role of endoscopy in Barrett’s esophagus and other premalignant conditions of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 76:1087–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang KK, Tian JM, Gorospe E et al (2012) Medical and endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Dis Esophagus 25:349–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lyday WD, Corbett FS, Kuperman DA et al (2010) Radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: outcomes of 429 patients from a multicenter community practice registry. Endoscopy 42:272–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Orman ES, Li N, Shaheen NJ (2013) Efficacy and durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:1245–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bulsiewicz WJ, Kim HP, Dellon ES et al (2013) Safety and efficacy of endoscopic mucosal therapy with radiofrequency ablation for patients with neoplastic Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:636–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Phoa KN, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG et al (2013) Remission of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia 5 years after radiofrequency ablation with endoscopic resection: a Netherlands cohort study. Gastroenterology 145:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Small AJ, Araujo JL, Leggett CL et al (2015) Radiofrequency ablation is associated with decreased neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and confirmed low-grade dysplasia. Gastroenterology 149:567–576 e3; quiz e13-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wolf WA, Pasricha S, Cotton C et al (2015) Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and causes of mortality after radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 149:1752–1761 e1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG et al (2016) ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 111:30–50 quiz 1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Smulian AG, Moore DM, Robertson JC, Kralovic SM (2014) Phase I study demonstrates safety and tolerability of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the anal mucosa. HIV Clin Trials 15:36–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Thomas Cox J et al (2013) The lower anogenital squamous terminology standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol 32:76–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sirera G, Videla S, Pinol M et al (2013) Long-term effectiveness of infrared coagulation for the treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 in HIV-infected men and women. AIDS 27:951–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Swedish KA, Lee EQ, Goldstone SE (2011) The changing picture of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in men who have sex with men: the effects of 10 years of experience performing high-resolution anoscopy. Dis Colon rectum 54:1003–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Silvera R, Gaisa MM, Goldstone SE (2014) Random biopsy during high-resolution anoscopy increases diagnosis of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 65:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients who volunteered for the study and the site study personnel and pathologists at Quest Diagnostics and Enzo Clinical Laboratories for their assistance in interpreting histology.

Author/coauthor contributions

Author contributions include conception and study design (SEG, SRH, SD), study recruitment and data acquisition (SEG), study analysis and interpretation of the data (SEG, RNG, TMD, AvZ), drafting of the article (SEG, RNG), critical revision of the article for important intellectual content (SEG, RNG, SRH, SD, TMD, AvZ), and final approval of the article (SEG, RNG, SRH, SD, TMD, AvZ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen E. Goldstone.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The study was sponsored and funded by Medtronic (Sunnyvale, CA). Medtronic provided medical writing assistance and statistical analysis support. SEG and TMD (or their institutions) received research support from Medtronic to conduct this trial. TMD has received supplies from Hologic. SRH and SD are employees and stockholders of Medtronic. SEG received consulting fees from Medtronic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldstone, R.N., Hasan, S.R., Drury, S. et al. A trial of radiofrequency ablation for anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 357–365 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2679-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2679-2

Keywords

Navigation