Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of rectal cancer treatment—influence of age?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate how age influences the selection to different treatment modalities for rectal cancer and how these differences in approach affect the short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods

A single-center cohort of all 837 rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 1994 and 2006 was analyzed. Patients <75, 75–79, 80–84, and >85 years were compared.

Results

Treatment for cure was judged possible for 80.8, 77.9, 74.6, and 65.3 % of the four age groups (p = 0.02), and radiochemotherapy was given to 22.9, 19.3, 10.2, and 2 % of the same groups (p = 0.001). Local resection was performed for 3.7, 14.7, 13.6, and 24.5 % (p < 0.001) and anterior resection for 66.6, 54.1, 56.8, and 49 % (p < 0.001). The 5-year rates of local recurrence were 5.3, 8.3, 12.8, and 22.3 % (p < 0.001), and overall survival was 70, 54, 45.9, and 29.8 % in the four groups treated with curative intent (p < 0.001). Relative survival was 76.4, 72.6, 72.9, and 72.3 % (ns).

Conclusions

Age caused treatment to be modified; there was less surgery for patients over 85 years, less radiochemotherapy over 80 years, and less major radical surgery over 75 years. This strategy resulted in more local recurrences among the elderly, although no certain effect on relative survival was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer registry of Norway (2010) Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway:134 http://www.kreftregisteret.no/no/Generelt/Publikasjoner/Cancer-in-Norway/Cancer-in-Norway-2010/

  2. Rutten HJ, den Dulk M, Lemmens VE et al (2008) Controversies of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in elderly patients. Lancet Oncol 9:494–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J et al (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Helsedirektoratet (2012) Nasjonalt handlingsprogram med retningslinjer for diagnostikk, behandling og oppfølging av tykk- og endetarmskreft:184 http://helsedirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/nasjonalt-handlingsprogram-med-retningslinjer-for-diagnostikk-behandling-og-oppfolging-av-kreft-i-tykktarm-og-endetarm/Sider/default.aspx

  5. Alley PG (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. Lancet 356:956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedrazzani C, Cerullo G, De Marco G et al (2009) Impact of age-related comorbidity on results of colorectal cancer surgery. World J Gastroenterol 15:5706–5711

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jung B, Pahlman L, Johansson R, Nilsson E (2009) Rectal cancer treatment and outcome in the elderly: an audit based on the Swedish rectal cancer registry 1995-2004. BMC Cancer 9:68–75

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiran R, Pokala N, Dudrick S (2007) Long-term outcome after operative intervention for rectal cancer in patients aged over 80 years: analysis of 9,501 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:604–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrier A, Ferro L, Houry S et al (2003) Rectal cancer surgery in patients more than 80 years of age. Am J Surg 185:54–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Townsley CA, Selby R, Siu LL (2005) Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:3112–3124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutten H, den Dulk M, Lemmens V et al (2007) Survival of elderly rectal cancer patients not improved: analysis of population based data on the impact of TME surgery. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 43:2295–2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weitz J, Koch M, Debus J et al (2005) Colorectal cancer. Lancet 365:153–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V et al (2010) Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 11:835–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2005) Long-term results of preoperative chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer correlation between final stage and survival. J Gastrointest Surg 9:90–99, discussion 99-101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nedrebo BS, Soreide K, Eriksen MT et al (2011) Survival effect of implementing national treatment strategies for curatively resected colonic and rectal cancer. Br J Surg 98:716–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (1997) TNM: Classification og Malignant Tumours. Wiley-Liss publication. New York

  17. American Society of Anesthesiologists (2011) ASA Physical Status Classification System. http://www.asahq.org/For-Members/Clinical-Information/ASA-Physical-Status-Classification-Systemaspx

  18. Manceau G, Karoui M, Werner A et al (2012) Comparative outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between elderly and non-elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 13:525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baatrup G, Endreseth BH, Isaksen V et al (2009) Preoperative staging and treatment options in T1 rectal adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol 48:328–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramirez JM, Aguilella V, Valencia J et al (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Long-term oncologic results. Int J Color Dis 26:437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Endreseth BH, Myrvold HE, Romundstad P et al (2005) Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1380–1388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Endreseth B, Romundstad P, Myrvold H et al (2006) Rectal cancer treatment of the elderly. Color Dis 8:471–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan E, Tilney H, Thompson M et al (2007) The United Kingdom National Bowel Cancer Project—epidemiology and surgical risk in the elderly. Eur J Cancer 43:2285–2294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kessler H, Hermanek P Jr, Wiebelt H (1993) Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the German Multicentre Study. Int J Color Dis 8:158–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Law WL, Choi HK, Ho JW et al (2006) Outcomes of surgery for mid and distal rectal cancer in the elderly. World J Surg 30:598–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vironen JH, Sainio P, Husa AI, Kellokumpu IH (2004) Complications and survival after surgery for rectal cancer in patients younger than and aged 75 years or older. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1225–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Arenal JJ, Tinoco C, Labarga F et al (2012) Colorectal cancer in nonagenarians. Color Dis 14:44–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Phillips PS, Farquharson SM, Sexton R et al (2004) Rectal cancer in the elderly: patients’ perception of bowel control after restorative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 47:287–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ho P, Law WL, Chan SC et al (2003) Functional outcome following low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision in the elderly. Int J Color Dis 18:230–233

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Stornes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stornes, T., Wibe, A., Romundstad, P.R. et al. Outcomes of rectal cancer treatment—influence of age?. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 825–834 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1878-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1878-y

Keywords

Navigation