Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Colon transit time and anorectal manometry in children and young adults with spina bifida

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluates colon transit time (CTT) and anorectal manometry (ARM) in spina bifida (SB) patients in relation to the level of lesion, mobility, constipation, and continence status.

Methods

SB patients between 6 and 19 years, who are not using antegrade continence enemas and followed at the SB Reference Centre UZ Ghent, were asked to participate. Medical history was retrospectively retrieved from the medical file. Stool habits were prospectively collected using standardized questionnaires. CTT was measured using the 6-day pellet abdominal X-ray method. ARM was performed in non-sedated children with a water-perfused, latex-free catheter.

Results

Forty out of 52 eligible patients consented to perform CTT, of which 19 also performed the ARM. Fifteen (37 %) SB patients were constipated despite treatment. Twenty-six (65 %) were (pseudo) continent. The total CTT was significantly prolonged in SB patients (median CTT 86.4 vs. 36 h controls). The CTT was significantly prolonged in constipated SB patients compared to non-constipated SB patients (122.4 vs. 52.8 h). Spontaneously continent patients had a normal CTT (33.6 h) as well as a significantly higher resting pressure compared to the pseudo-continent and incontinent SB patients (resting pressure 56.5 vs. 32.5 mmHg). An abnormal CTT was associated with a treatment necessity to achieve pseudo-continence (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

CTT in SB patients was significantly prolonged, indicating a neurogenic involvement of the bowel and slow transit constipation. SB patients with a normal CTT and a normal ARM spontaneously achieved fecal continence. CTT can help tailor the continence therapy in SB patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verhoef M, Lurvink M, Barf HA, Post MW, Van Asbeck FW, Gooskens RH et al (2005) High prevalence of incontinence among young adults with spina bifida: description, prediction and problem perception. Spinal Cord 43(6):331–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Malone P, Wheeler R, Williams J (1994) Continence in patients with spina bifida: long term results. Arch Dis Child 70:107–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vande Velde S, Van Biervliet S, Van Renterghem K, Van Laecke E, Hoebeke P, Van Winckel M (2007) Achieving fecal continence in patients with spina bifida: a descriptive cohort study. J Urol 178(6):2640–2644, discussion 4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krogh K, Lie HR, Bilenberg N, Laurberg S (2003) Bowel function in Danish children with myelomeningocele. APMIS 109:S81–S85

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pigeon N, Leroi AM, Devroede G, Watier A, Denis P, Weber J, Arhan P (1997) Colonic transit time in patients with myelomeningocele. Neurogastroenterol Motil 9(2):63–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Faye A, Arsac M (2002) Importance of colonic transit evaluation in the management of fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 17(6):412–417, discussion 8-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin HC, Prather C, Fisher RS et al (2005) Measurement of gastrointestinal transit. Dig Dis Sci 50(6):989–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Southwell BR, Clarke MCC, Sutcliffe J, Hutson JM (2009) Colonic transit studies: normal values for adults and children with comparison of radiological and scintigraphic methods. Pediatr Surg Int 25:559–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arhan P, Faverdin C, Devroede G, Pierre-Kahn A, Scott H, Pellerin D (1984) Anorectal motility after surgery for spina bifida. Dis Colon Rectum 27(3):159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marte A, Cotrufo AM, Di Iorio G, De Pasquale M (2001) Electromyographic and manometric anorectal evaluation in children affected by neuropathic bladder secondary to myelomeningocele. Minerva Pediatr 53(3):171–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW (1997) Stool form as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:920–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD et al (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130(5):1480–1491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar S, Ramadan S, Gupta V, Helmy S, Atta I, Alkholy A (2009) Manometric tests of anorectal function in 90 healthy children: a clinical study from Kuwait. J Ped Surg 44:1786–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abrahamsson H, Antov S, Bosaeus I (1988) Gastrointestinal and colonic segmental transit time evaluated by a single abdominal x-ray in healthy subjects and constipated patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 23:S72–S80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arhan P, Devroede G, Jehannin B et al (1981) Segmental colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum 24:625–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA (2004) Pathophysiology of pediatric fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl 1):S33–S40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Arhan P et al (1992) What is the meaning of colorectal transit time measurement? Dis Colon Rectum 35:773–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 3K12D, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    S. Vande Velde, L. Pratte, M. Van Winckel & S. Van Biervliet

  2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 3K12D, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    V. Meersschaut & N. Herregods

  3. Spina Bifida Reference Centre, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 3K12D, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    H. Verhelst

Authors
  1. S. Vande Velde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Pratte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Verhelst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. Meersschaut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. Herregods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Van Winckel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. Van Biervliet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Vande Velde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velde, S.V., Pratte, L., Verhelst, H. et al. Colon transit time and anorectal manometry in children and young adults with spina bifida. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 1547–1553 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1733-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1733-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation