Skip to main content

The Two-Week Referral System for colorectal cancer—not fit for purpose

Abstract

Purpose

The UK government target expects all suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to be seen within the Two-Week Referral (TWR) system made by general practitioners. These guidelines originally derived from only level 5 evidence. However, this has significant impact on the workload for colorectal surgeons. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of this colorectal service and whether the referral criteria are predictive of CRC.

Methods

A retrospective study of all patients referred under the TWR guidance in 2010 was assessed. The first 573 TWRs were piloted for analysis. Clinical information from each patient was collected regarding TWR criteria and additional colorectal symptoms or risk factors. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine which symptoms independently correlated with CRC.

Results

One hundred twenty-six CRCs were diagnosed via all methods of referral in 2010. There were 940 patients referred under the TWR guidelines in that year, when 50 CRC patients were identified. Amongst the 573 patients, 32 CRCs were diagnosed. Multiple regression analysis revealed tenesmus to be independently associated with CRC (p = 0.003, Pearson’s r = 0.09185). None of the individual TWR criteria confidently predicted CRC.

Conclusion

Our preliminary results suggest that the current TWR guidelines cannot effectively predict CRC. There is an urgent need for an evidence-based approach to referral criteria for suspected CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Department of Health (2000). Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4014421.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2012

  2. Chohan DP, Goodwin K, Wilkinson S, Miller R, Hall NR (2005) How has the ‘two-week wait’ rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer? Colorectal Dis 7:450–453

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (2000) Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 50:7–33

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2005). NICE Guideline 27—referral guidelines for suspected cancer. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg027niceguideline.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2012

  5. Flashman K, O’Leary DP, Senapati A, Thompson MR (2005) The Department of Health’s “two week standard” for bowel cancer: is it working? Gut 53:387–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung E, Grinager J, Bandla N, Wong L (2010) The effectiveness of the “2-week wait” referral service for colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Pract 64:1671–1674

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thorne K, Hutchings HA, Elwyn G (2006) The effects of the Two-Week rule on NHS colorectal cancer diagnostic services: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 6:43

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eccersley AJ, Wilson EM, Makris A, Novell JR (2003) Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer—do they work? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:107–110

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones R, Rubin G, Hungin P (2001) Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working? BMJ 322:1555–1556

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith RA, Oshin O, McCallum J, Randles J, Kennedy S, Delamere S, Rooney PS, Carter PS (2007) Outcomes in 2748 patients referred to a colorectal two-week rule clinic. Colorectal Dis 9:340–343

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Selvachandran SN, Hodder RJ, Ballal MS, Jones P, Cade D (2002) Prediction of colorectal cancer by a patient consultation questionnaire and scoring system: a prospective study. Lancet 360:278–283

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Debnath D, Dielehner N, Gunning KA (2002) Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months’ audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer. Postgrad Med J 78:748–751

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barwick TW, Scott SB, Ambrose NS (2004) The two week referral for colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. Colorectal Dis 6:85–91

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw AG, Simpson J, Tierney G, Goddard AF, Reynolds JR, Lund JN (2008) Referral of patients with iron deficiency anaemia under the lower gastrointestinal two-week wait rule. Colorectal Dis 10:294–297

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rai S, Kelly MJ (2007) Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system. Colorectal Dis 9:195–202

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. NHS Improvement (2009) Going further on cancer waits: the symptomatic Breast Two Week Wait Standard. http://www.improvement.nhs.uk/cancer/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=AoTl2cFdCuM%3D&tabid=62. Accessed 9 Aug 2012

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert T. Padwick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padwick, R.T., Bajwa, A.A., Shaw, A. et al. The Two-Week Referral System for colorectal cancer—not fit for purpose. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 1531–1534 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1730-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1730-9

Keywords

  • Two-week referral
  • Fast-track referral
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Referral criteria
  • Presentation