Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biological mesh reconstruction of perineal wounds following enhanced abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

An abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER) may be required for rectal tumours less than 6 cm from the anal verge. Recently, the cylindrical APER has been used to prevent the “surgical waist” and so decrease margin involvement. However, removal of the levators leaves a large defect. Myocutaneous flaps [e.g. vertical rectus abdominis (VRAM)] are often used to fill the cylindrical resection defect, but have disadvantages associated with operative time, expertise and morbidity. We report our early experience of pelvic floor reconstruction with a biological mesh following cylindrical APER.

Methods

Data on consecutive patients having cylindrical APER between January 2008 and November 2010 were collected. Outcomes were compared between a VRAM reconstruction group and a mesh group.

Results

In 15 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer, five patients had VRAM pelvic floor reconstruction prior to ten patients having biosynthetic mesh repairs. The median operative time for the VRAM cohort was 405 min, compared with 259 min for the mesh (p = 0.0013). The median length of postoperative stay was 20 days for VRAM and 10 days for the mesh group (p = 0.067). There were four early complications for the VRAM group compared with seven for the mesh cohort (p = 0.37). The median cost per patient for the VRAM cohort was £11,075 compared to a median cost of £6,513 for the Mesh (p = 0.0097).

Conclusion

The use of a biological mesh for pelvic floor reconstruction following cylindrical APER is feasible with morbidity comparable to VRAM reconstruction. There is significant cost-saving using a biosynthetic mesh, mainly due to reduced length of stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell SW, Dehni N, Chaouat M, Lifante JC, Parc R, Tiret E (2005) Primary rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for repair of perineal and vaginal defects after extended abdominoperineal resection. Br J Surg 92:482–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A, Sexton R, Moran BJ (1997) Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum—an endangered operation. Norman Nigro lectureship. Dis Colon Rectum 40:747–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 133:894–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arbman G, Nilsson E, Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:375–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, Cedemark B (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm colorectal cancer study group, Basingstoke bowel cancer research project. Lancet 356:93–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:48–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ, Langmark F, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ (2002) Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg 89:1142–1149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons WJ, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scott N, Johnston D, Sagar P, Finan P, Quirke P (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242:74–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN (2004) Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miles WE (1908) A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 2:1812–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517–3522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nisar PJ, Scott HJ (2009) Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 11:806–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bullard KM, Trudel JL, Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA (2005) Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum 48:438–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Artioukh DY, Smith RA, Gokul K (2007) Risk factors for impaired healing of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection of rectum for carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 9:362–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shukla HS, Hughes LE (1984) The rectus abdominis flap for perineal wounds. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66:337–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE (1976) Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:176–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaw A, Futrell JW (1978) Cure of chronic perineal sinus with gluteus maximus flap. Surg Gynecol Obstet 147:417–420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Szczerba SR, Dumanian GA (2003) Definitive surgical treatment of infected or exposed ventral hernia mesh. Ann Surg 237:437–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rice RD, Ayubi FS, Shaub ZJ, Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Tsai JW. Comparison of Surgisis, AlloDerm, and Vicryl Woven Mesh grafts for abdominal wall defect repair in an animal model. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:290–296

  25. Ueno T, Pickett LC, de la Fuente SG, Lawson DC, Pappas TN (2004) Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects. J Gastrointest Surg 8:109–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patton JH Jr, Berry S, Kralovich KA (2007) Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg 193:360–363, discussion 363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wille-Jorgensen P, Pilsgaard B, Moller P (2009) Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:323–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rothenberger DA, Wong WD (1992) Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. World J Surg 16:478–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van der Wal BC, Cleffken BI, Gulec B, Kaufman HS, Choti MA (2001) Results of salvage abdominoperineal resection for recurrent anal carcinoma following combined chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 5:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Khoo AK, Skibber JM, Nabawi AS, Gurlek A, Youssef AA, Wang B, Robb GL, Miller MJ (2001) Indications for immediate tissue transfer for soft tissue reconstruction in visceral pelvic surgery. Surgery 130:463–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kapoor V, Cole J, Isik FF, Sinanan M, Flum D (2005) Does the use of a flap during abdominoperineal resection decrease pelvic wound morbidity? Am Surg 71:117–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hendren SK, Swallow CJ, Smith A, Lipa JE, Cohen Z, MacRae HM, Gryfe R, O'Connor BI, McLeod RS (2007) Complications and sexual function after vaginectomy for anorectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 50:810–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Entry School of Medicine and Health, Division of Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK

    Oliver Peacock & J. N. Lund

  2. Colorectal Surgery Department, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK

    H. Pandya, T. Sharp, N. G. Hurst, W. J. Speake & G. M. Tierney

Authors
  1. Oliver Peacock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Pandya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Sharp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. G. Hurst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W. J. Speake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. M. Tierney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. N. Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Peacock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peacock, O., Pandya, H., Sharp, T. et al. Biological mesh reconstruction of perineal wounds following enhanced abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER). Int J Colorectal Dis 27, 475–482 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1325-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1325-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation