Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Damage control with abdominal vacuum therapy (VAC) to manage perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis—a proof of concept

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis is a life-threatening condition requiring emergency operation. To reduce the rate of colostomy formation, a new treatment algorithm with damage control operation, lavage, limited closure of perforation, abdominal vacuum-assisted closure (VAC; V.A.C.®), and second look to restore intestinal continuity was developed.

Methods

This algorithm allowed for three surgical procedures: primary anastomosis ± VAC in stable patients (group I), but damage control with lavage, limited resection of the diseased colonic segment, VAC and second-look operation with delayed anastomosis in patients with advanced peritonitis or septic shock (group II), and Hartmann procedure was done for social reasons in stable patients (group III)

Results

All 27 consecutive patients (16 women; median age 68 years) requiring emergency laparotomy for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey III/IV) between October 2006 and September 2008 were prospectively enrolled in the study. No major complications were observed in group I (n = 6). Nine patients in group II (n = 15) had intestinal continuity restored during a second-look operation, of whom one patient developed anastomotic leakage. The median length of stay at intensive care unit was 5 days. Considering an overall mortality rate of 26% (n = 7), the rate of anastomosis in surviving patients was 70%.

Conclusions

Damage control with lavage, limited bowel resection, VAC, and scheduled second-look operation represents a feasible strategy in patients with perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey III and IV) to enhance sepsis control and improve rate of anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chautems RC, Ambrosetti P, Ludwig A, Mermillod B, Morel P, Soravia C (2002) Long-term follow-up after first acute episode of sigmoid diverticulitis: is surgery mandatory?: a prospective study of 118 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:962–966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman J, Davies M, Wolff B, Dozois E, Tessier D, Harrington J, Larson D (2005) Complicated diverticulitis: is it time to rethink the rules? Ann Surg 242:576–581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagorney DM, Adson MA, Pemberton JH (1985) Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis. Dis Colon Rectum 28:71–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Salem L, Anaya DA, Roberts KE, Flum DR (2005) Hartmann’s colectomy and reversal in diverticulitis: a population-level assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 48:988–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs DO (2007) Clinical practice. Diverticulitis. N Engl J Med 357:2057–2066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Janes SE, Meagher A, Frizelle FA (2006) Management of diverticulitis. BMJ 332:271–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krukowski ZH, Matheson NA (1984) Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalized and faecal peritonitis: a review. Br J Surg 71:921–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Purkayastha S, Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Aydin N, Darzi A, Senapati A (2006) Primary resection with anastomosis vs. Hartmann’s procedure in nonelective surgery for acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 49:966–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferzoco LB, Raptopoulos V, Silen W (1998) Acute diverticulitis. N Engl J Med 338:1521–1526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salem L, Flum DR (2004) Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1953–1964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seetharam S, Paige J, Horgan PG (2003) Impact of socioeconomic deprivation and primary pathology on rate of reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Am J Surg 186:154–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bordeianou L, Hodin R (2007) Controversies in the surgical management of sigmoid diverticulitis. J Gastrointest Surg 11:542–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Constantinides VA, Heriot A, Remzi F, Darzi A, Senapati A, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP (2007) Operative strategies for diverticular peritonitis: a decision analysis between primary resection and anastomosis versus Hartmann’s procedures. Ann Surg 245:94–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vermeulen J, Akkersdijk GP, Gosselink MP, Hop WC, Mannaerts GH, van der HE C, PP WWF, Lange JF (2007) Outcome after emergency surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis in 200 cases. Dig Surg 24:361–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chouillard E, Maggiori L, Ata T, Jarbaoui S, Rivkine E, Benhaim L, Ghiles E, Etienne JC, Fingerhut A (2007) Laparoscopic two-stage left colonic resection for patients with peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1157–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor CJ, Layani L, Ghusn MA, White SI (2006) Perforated diverticulitis managed by laparoscopic lavage. ANZ J Surg 76:962–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Favuzza J, Friel JC, Kelly JJ, Perugini R, Counihan TC (2009) Benefits of peritoneal lavage for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:797–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Franklin ME Jr, Dorman JP, Jacobs M, Plasencia G (1997) Is laparoscopic surgery applicable to complicated colonic diverticular disease? Surg Endosc 11:1021–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frattini J, Longo WE (2006) Diagnosis and treatment of chronic and recurrent diverticulitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 40:S145–S149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kohler L, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E (1999) Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease: results of a consensus development conference. The Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 13:430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barker DE, Kaufman HJ, Smith LA, Ciraulo DL, Richart CL, Burns RP (2000) Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients. J Trauma 48:201–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Perez D, Wildi S, Demartines N, Bramkamp M, Koehler C, Clavien PA (2007) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg 205:586–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller PR, Meredith JW, Johnson JC, Chang MC (2004) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen: planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced. Ann Surg 239:608–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cipolla J, Stawicki SP, Hoff WS, McQuay N, Hoey BA, Wainwright G, Grossman MD (2005) A proposed algorithm for managing the open abdomen. Am Surg 71:202–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Teixeira PG, Salim A, Inaba K, Brown C, Browder T, Margulies D, Demetriades D (2008) A prospective look at the current state of open abdomens. Am Surg 74:891–897

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U, Wesch G, Streifensand RA, Gundlach E (1987) The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis. Chirurg 58:84–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ansari MZ, Collopy BT, Hart WG, Carson NJ, Chandraraj EJ (2000) In-hospital mortality and associated complications after bowel surgery in Victorian public hospitals. Aust N Z J Surg 70:6–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Komen N, Dijk JW, Lalmahomed Z, Klop K, Hop W, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H, Schouten WR, Lange JF (2009) After-hours colorectal surgery: a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:789–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schwesinger WH, Page CP, Gaskill HV III, Steward RM, Chopra S, Strodel WE, Sirinek KR (2000) Operative management of diverticular emergencies: strategies and outcomes. Arch Surg 135:558–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch.

Additional information

Conception, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data were carried out by Alexander Perathoner, Alexander Klaus, and Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch. Drafting and revision of the article were made by Alexander Perathoner, Alexander Klaus, Gilbert Mühlmann, Michael Oberwalder, Raimund Margreiter, and Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perathoner, A., Klaus, A., Mühlmann, G. et al. Damage control with abdominal vacuum therapy (VAC) to manage perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis—a proof of concept. Int J Colorectal Dis 25, 767–774 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0887-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0887-8

Keywords

Navigation