Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 22, Issue 11, pp 1339–1346 | Cite as

Anatomical considerations in TNM staging and therapeutical procedures for low rectal cancer

  • Felix Aigner
  • Thomas Trieb
  • Dietmar Öfner
  • Raimund Margreiter
  • Alexander DeVries
  • Andrew P. Zbar
  • Helga Fritsch
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Separation of the mesoderm-derived muscular structures and the endoderm-derived structures of the hindgut and reclassification of their involvement based on their embryological origin may be of clinical importance in providing anatomical support for a more standardized perineal resection during abdominoperineal resection. The aim of this study was to utilize magnetic resonance images and histological studies of fetal and neonatal specimens to redefine the T3/T4 distinction by reassessment of the intersphincteric plane and the pelvic diaphragm as they pertain to cancer infiltration and as part of the embryological development of the pelvic floor muscles and their connective tissue compartments.

Materials and methods

Pelvic floor anatomy was studied in seven newborn children and 120 embryos and fetuses. Anatomical data were completed by magnetic resonance imaging in 82 patients with T3 and T4 rectal cancers (64 T3, 18 T4; 35 women and 47 men) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced (T3 or T4) rectal cancers.

Results

Clear demarcation between mesodermal and endodermal structures of the pelvic floor, which is equally evident in plastinated sections and magnetic resonance images, is already visible in early fetal stages. There is a constitutive overlap between the endoderm- and the ectoderm-derived components of the pelvic floor.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the current classification of rectal cancer staging is confusing, where the routinely used TNM classification system unnecessarily differentiates between embryologically identical muscular structures. Tumor spread along the musculature of the hindgut beyond the dentate line could possibly explain the occasional involvement of lymph nodes outside the conventional mesorectum.

Keywords

Mesorectal excision Intersphincteric plane Hindgut development Lymph node 

References

  1. 1.
    Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ (2002) Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg 89:1142–1149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hermanek P, Hohenberger W, Klimpfinger M, Kockerling F, Papadopoulos T (2003) The pathological assessment of mesorectal excision: implications for further treatment and quality management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:335–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishikawa K, Fujimoto H, Shinto E, Hase K (2004) Preoperative parameters expanding the indication of sphincter preserving surgery in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 239:34–42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Abbott CR, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D, Quirke P (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 235:449–457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen CC, Lee RC, Lin JK, Wang LW, Yang SH (2005) How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy? Dis Colon Rectum 48:722–728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heald RJ, Moran BJ (1998) Embryology and anatomy of the rectum. Sem Surg Oncol 15:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wittekind C, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH (2001) TNM supplement, a commentary on uniform use, 2nd edn. Wiley–Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons WJ, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scott N, Johnston D, Sagar P, Finan P, Quirke P (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision. The next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242:74–82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL, Vliegen RFA, Kessels AG, Van Boven H, De Bruine A, von Meyenfeldt MF, Baeten CG, van Engelshoven JM (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fucini C, Elbetti C, Petrolo A, Casella D (2002) Excision of the levator muscles with external sphincter preservation in the treatment of selected low T4 rectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1697–1705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fritsch H (1989) Staining of different tissues in thick epoxy resin impregnated sections of human fetuses. Stain Technol 64:75–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fritsch H, Froehlich B (1994) Development of the levator ani muscle in human fetuses. Early Hum Dev 37:15–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Church JM, Raudkivi PJ, Hill GI (1987) The surgical anatomy of the rectum—a review with particular reference to the hazards of rectal mobilization. Int J Colorect Dis 2:158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faucheron J-L (2005) Pelvic anatomy for colorectal surgeons. Acta Chir Belg 105:471–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fucini C, Elbetti C, Messerini L (1999) Anatomical plane of separation between the external anal sphincter and the puborectalis muscle: clinical implications. Dis Colon Rectum 42:374–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wittekind C, Meyer HF, Bootz F (2003) UICC International Union Against Cancer. TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stelzner F (1998) Die Chirugie an den viszeralen Abschlusssystemen. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fritsch H (1994) Topography and subdivision of the pelvic connective tissue in human fetuses and in the adult. Surg Radiol Anat 16:259–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fritsch H, Hotzinger H (1995) Topographical anatomy of the pelvis, visceral pelvic connective tissue and its compartments. Clin Anat 8:17–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery. The clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg 69:613–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miles WE (1908) A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 172(4451):1812–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moreira LF, Hizuta A, Iwagaki H, Tanaka N, Orita K (1994) Lateral lymph node dissection for rectal carcinoma below the peritoneal reflection. Br J Surg 81:293–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Syk E, Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L, Ljungqvist O, Glimelius B (2006) Radiological findings do not support lateral residual tumour as a major cause of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:113–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S (1997) Importance of extended lymphadenectomy with lateral node dissection for advanced rectal cancer. World J Surg 21:728–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:48–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feigen M, Crocker EF, Read J, Crandon AJ (1987) The value of lymphoscintigraphy, lymphangiography and computer tomography scanning in the preoperative assessment of lymph nodes involved by pelvic malignant conditions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165:107–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang C, Zhou ZG, Yu YY, Li Y, Lei WZ, Cheng Z, Chen ZX (2007) Patterns of lateral pelvic lymph node metastases and micrometastases for patients with lower rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:463–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D (1983) Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of the patients’ survival. Br J Surg 70:1504Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Killingback M, Barron P, Dent OF (2001) Local recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the rectum without total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 44:473–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Scott N, Jackson P, al-Jaberi T, Dixon MF, Quirke P, Finan PJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:1031–1033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chan CLH, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Renwick AA, Dent OF (2006) Local recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer is associated with anterior position of the tumour. Br J Surg 93:105–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weiss H, Kafka-Ritsch R, Zitt M, Klaus A, Heute D, Moncayo R, Kovacs P, Bale R, Öfner D (2205) The Innsbruck sentinel lymph node study in colorectal cancer—a pilot study. Eur Surg 37(3):159–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Glimelius B, Påhlman L (1999) Preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Acta Oncol 38:23–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Aigner
    • 1
  • Thomas Trieb
    • 2
  • Dietmar Öfner
    • 1
  • Raimund Margreiter
    • 1
  • Alexander DeVries
    • 3
  • Andrew P. Zbar
    • 4
  • Helga Fritsch
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of General and Transplant SurgeryInnsbruck Medical UniversityInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Department of Radiology IInnsbruck Medical UniversityInnsbruckAustria
  3. 3.Department of Radio-Oncology, Feldkirch Medical HospitalFeldkirchAustria
  4. 4.Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine and ResearchThe University of the West Indies, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBridgetownBarbados
  5. 5.Department of Anatomy, Histology and EmbryologyInnsbruck Medical UniversityInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations