International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 22, Issue 12, pp 1459–1462 | Cite as

An assessment of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in four countries of the European Union

  • Carlo Zanotti
  • Carmen Martinez-Puente
  • Isabel Pascual
  • María Pascual
  • Dolores Herreros
  • Damián García-Olmo
Original Article

Abstract

Background and aims

In spite of its long history, fistula-in-ano is generally considered to be relatively uncommon. Nevertheless, no comprehensive analysis of its incidence in developed countries is available. Our goal was to determine the actual incidence of fistula-in-ano based on the study of incidence in four countries of the European Union (EU).

Materials and methods

We performed a search of hospital inpatient databases in five different countries. We obtained valid data from four European countries, namely, England (UK; Hospital Episodes Statistics), Germany (German hospitals’ databases), Italy (Scheda di Dimissione Ospedaliera), and Spain (Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos by Insalud—Spanish National Health Institute).

Results

The incidence of fistula-in-ano varied among the different populations in the EU. In the four countries examined, it ranged from 1.04 per 10,000/year in Spain to 2.32 per 10,000/year in Italy. A statistical comparison of rates from the different countries studied gives a confidence interval from 1.20 up to 2.80. The population that we studied represents almost 51% of the total population of the EU.

Conclusion

This study attempts to determine the actual incidence of fistula-in-ano in the European Community, which was previously uncertain despite its major negative effects on quality of life and the high cost of treatment. Our findings indicate that the incidence of fistula-in-ano in the four countries of the EU studied is significantly higher than that in the only previously published report of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in Europe. Nevertheless, our findings confirm the general perception that fistula-in-ano is a relatively uncommon disease.

Keywords

Rectal fistula Incidence Epidemiology 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Prof. García-Caballero, Director of Preventive Medicine, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain), for his useful help with the statistical analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Bodemer CW (1983) France, the fundament, and the rise of surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 26:743–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sainio P (1984) Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaecol 73:219–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hammond TM, Grahn MF, Lunniss PJ (2004) Fibrin glue in the management of anal fistulae. Colorectal Dis 5:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS (2000) MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics 20:623–635CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fletcher RW, Fletcher SW (2005) Clinical epidemiology: the essentials, fourth edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp 61–63Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Zanotti
    • 2
  • Carmen Martinez-Puente
    • 3
  • Isabel Pascual
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • María Pascual
    • 2
  • Dolores Herreros
    • 1
    • 3
  • Damián García-Olmo
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Cellerix, S.L.MadridSpain
  3. 3.UAM-Cellerix for Cell Therapy and Regenerative MedicineMadridSpain
  4. 4.Servicio de Cirugía General C, Hospital Universitario “La Paz”MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations