Advertisement

1% Hydrocortisone ointment is an effective treatment of pruritus ani: a pilot randomized controlled crossover trial

  • R. Al-Ghnaniem
  • K. Short
  • A. Pullen
  • L. C. Fuller
  • J. A. Rennie
  • A. J. M. Leather
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Pruritus ani (PA) is a common condition which is difficult to treat in the absence of obvious predisposing factors. There is paucity of evidence-based guidelines on the treatment of this condition. We examined whether 1% hydrocortisone ointment is an effective treatment for PA.

Materials and methods

A pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was carried out. Eleven patients consented to take part in the trial and ten completed the study. After a 2-week run-in period, patients with primary PA were randomly allocated to receive 1% hydrocortisone ointment or placebo for 2 weeks followed by the opposite treatment for a further 2-week period. There was a washout period of 2 weeks between treatments. The primary outcome measure was reduction in itch using a visual analogue score (VAS). The secondary outcome measures were improvement in quality of life measured using a validated questionnaire (Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI) and improvement in clinical appearance of the perianal skin using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score.

Results

Treatment with 1% hydrocortisone ointment resulted in a 68% reduction in VAS compared with placebo (P = 0.019), a 75% reduction in DLQI score (P = 0.067), and 81% reduction in EASI score (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

A short course of mild steroid ointment is an effective treatment for PA.

Keywords

Pruritus ani Steroids Hydrocortisone Crossover trial Randomized controlled trial 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was approved by the King’s College Hospital Ethics Committee. All costs of running the trial were paid for using departmental research funds. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander-Williams J (1983) Pruritus ani. Br Med J 287:159–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oztas MO, Oztas P, Onder M (2004) Idiopathic perianal pruritus: washing compared with topical corticosteroids. Postgrad Med J 80:295–297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dasan S, Neill SM, Donaldson DR, Scott HJ (1999) Treatment of persistent pruritus ani in a combined colorectal and dermatological clinic. Br J Surg 86:1337–1340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lysy J, Sistiery-Ittah M, Israelit Y et al (2003) Topical capsaicin—a novel and effective treatment for idiopathic intractable pruritus ani: a randomised, placebo controlled, crossover study. Gut 52:1323–1326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finlay AY, Khan GK (1994) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 19:210–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanifin J, Thurston M, Omoto M, Cherill R, Tofte SJ, Graeber M (1998) The eczema area and severity index (EASI): assessment of reliability in atopic dermatitis. EASI Evaluator Group. Exp Dermatol 10:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexander-Williams J (1983) Causes and management of anal irritation. Br Med J 287:1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keighley MRB, Williams NS (1999) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Saunders, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allan A, Ambrose NS, Silverman S, Keighley MR (1987) Physiological study of pruritus ani. Br J Surg 74:576–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farouk R, Duthie GS, Pryde A, Bartolo DC (1994) Abnormal transient internal sphincter relaxation in idiopathic pruritus ani: physiological evidence from ambulatory monitoring. Br J Surg 81:603–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murie JA, Sim AJ, Mackenzie I (1981) The importance of pain, pruritus and soiling as symptoms of haemorrhoids and their response to haemorrhoidectomy or rubber band ligation. Br J Surg 68:247–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bircher AJ, Thurlimann W, Hunziker T et al (1995) Contact hypersensitivity to corticosteroids in routine patch test patients. A multi-centre study of the Swiss Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Dermatology 191:109–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corazza M, Mantovani L, Maranini C, Bacilieri S, Virgili A (2000) Contact sensitization to corticosteroids: increased risk in long term dermatoses. Eur J Dermatol 10:533–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldman L, Kitzmiller KW (1973) Perianal atrophoderma from topical corticosteroids. Arch Dermatol 107:611–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Al-Ghnaniem
    • 1
  • K. Short
    • 2
  • A. Pullen
    • 1
  • L. C. Fuller
    • 2
  • J. A. Rennie
    • 1
  • A. J. M. Leather
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKing’s College HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyKing’s College HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations