Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 22, Issue 12, pp 1469–1474 | Cite as

“Fast-track” rehabilitation after colonic surgery in elderly patients—is it feasible?

  • M. Scharfenberg
  • W. Raue
  • T. Junghans
  • W. Schwenk
Original Article

Abstract

Background and aims

The aim of the “fast-track” rehabilitation after elective colonic surgery is to lower the extent of general complications. Elderly patients may especially profit from this multi-modal peri-operative treatment including enforced early mobilisation and oral nutrition.

Materials and methods

In this prospective study using a well-defined post-operative multi-modal treatment programme, we examined the feasibility of this so-called fast-track rehabilitation in elderly patients. The programme employed combined thoracic peri-dural analgesia, early enforced mobilisation and rapid oral nutrition.

Results

Seventy-four consecutive patients older than 70 years with benign or malignant disease of the large intestine were operated on. All patients were treated peri-operatively using the “fast-track” rehabilitation programme. Of the patients, 84% were able to have liquids orally on the day of surgery and 86% had solid food on the 1st post-operative day. The median time until the first bowel movement was 2 days. Only 12 (16%) patients had a total of 16 local complications, including 2 (3%) patients with anastomotic leakages. Nine patients (12%) had a total of 14 general complications; mortality rate was 1% (n = 1). Patients were discharged from the hospital 5 (5th–95th percentile = 4–6 days) days after surgery.

Conclusion

Using the “fast-track” rehabilitation programme on elderly patient is not only feasible but may also lower the number of general complications and the duration of the hospital stay.

Keywords

“Fast-track” rehabilitation Elderly patients Post-operative complications Peri-operative treatment 

References

  1. 1.
    Schwenk W, Boehm B, Stock W (1992) Perioperative Behandlung bei elektiven kolorektalen Resektionen in Deutschland. Zentralbl Chir 117:35–43Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwenk W, Guenther N, Haase O, Konschake U et al (2004) Wandel der perioperativen Therapie bei elektiven kolorektalen Resektionen in Deutschland 1991 und 2001/2002. Zentralbl Chir 128(12):1086–1092Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15(2):116–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) “Colon-/rectal carcinoma” prospective studies as comprehensive surgical quality assurance. Chirurg 73(2):138–145 (discussion 145–146)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2001) Effect of caseload on the short-term outcome of colon surgery: results of a multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis 16(6):362–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milsom JW, Boehm B (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H et al (2002) Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387(3–4):130–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Staib L, Link KH, Blatz A, Berger HG (2002) Surgery of colorectal cancer: surgical morbidity and five- and ten-year results in 2400 patients—monoinstitutinal experience. World J Surg 26:59–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kehlet H, Büchler MW, Beart RW, Williamson RP, Billingham R (2006) Care after colonic operation—is it evidence based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg 202:45–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H (2000) Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 87(11):1540–1545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P et al (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232(1):51–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD et al (1992) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 340(8823):831–833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kehlet H (1998) Modification of responses to surgery by neural blockade: clinical implications. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO (eds) Neural blockade in clinical anaesthesia and management of pain. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 129–175Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wexner SD (1998) Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced lengths of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 186(5):589–593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM et al (1995) Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 222(1):73–77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolters U, Isenberg J, Stutzer H (1997) Colorectal carcinoma—aspects of surgery in the elderly. Anticancer Res 17:1273–1276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Menke H, Graf JM, Heinz A et al (1993) Risk factors of perioperative morbidity and mortality in colorectal cancer with special references to tumor stage, site and age. Zentralbl Chir 118(1):40–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley LW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86(7):938–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arenal JJ, Benito C, Ortega C et al (1999) Colorectal resection and primary anastomosis in patients aged 70 and older: prospective study. Eur J Surg 165:593–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2005) The impact of the risk factor “age” on the early postoperative results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma and its significance for perioperative management. World J Surg 29(8):1013–1021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Payne JE, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT (1986) Surgery for large bowel cancer in people aged 75 years and older. Dis Colon Rectum 29(11):733–777CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anonymous (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systemic review. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:968–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kashtan H, Werbin N, Wasserman I et al (1992) Colorectal cancer in patients over 70 years old. A prospective study of operative results. Isr J Med Sci 28(12):861–864PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paksoy M, Ipek T, Colak T, Cebeci H (1999) Influence of age on prognosis and management of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg 165:55–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, Billesbolle P, Lund C, Mogensen T, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241(3):416–423CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Scharfenberg
    • 1
  • W. Raue
    • 1
  • T. Junghans
    • 1
  • W. Schwenk
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral-, Gefaess, und ThoraxchirurgieCharite Universitaetsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations