International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 22, Issue 11, pp 1361–1367 | Cite as

The blind colonic J-pouch: an original technique to reduce the surgical risk in the treatment of extra-peritoneal rectal cancer

  • Gabriele Valenti
  • Costantino Campisi
  • Alessandro Testa
  • Alessandro Arturi
  • Giovanni Torino
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Low and ultra-low anterior resection with colo-rectal or colo-anal anastomosis is accompanied by high frequency of postoperative anastomotic leakage. The aim of this report is to describe a novel technical approach to colorectal reconstruction.

Materials and methods

The innovative procedure introduces the principle of ‘no anastomosis–no leakage’, and it can be performed both laparascopically or by means of a laparotomy. It consists of a simple colo-rectal or colo-anal apposition with latero-terminal modality, with the creation of a colonic J-pouch called “blind” because it remains closed in the external site and the anus is sealed up. The surgery is completed with an exclusive derivative colostomy, and the reconstruction of the intestinal continuity is postponed to a second operation. Within 4–6 weeks from the first, the blind pouch is opened, the communication between the anus and the colon is established, and the colostomy is closed and reduced in the peritoneal cavity.

Results and conclusions

Ethics committee of our hospital approved the experimental program; actually, we are finishing the first step on 15 patients, and preliminary clinical results look like to be very good. The innovative methodology is here described in advance, and we pledge to spread clinical results in a subsequent report.

Keywords

Blind pouch technique Ultra-low and colo-anal anastomosis Anastomotic leakage prevention 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research program is supported by internal institutional financial grants.

References

  1. 1.
    Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky G (1980) Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. BMJ 281:411–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Graf W, Glimelius B, Bergstrom R, Pahlman L (1991) Complication after double and single stapling in rectal surgery. Eur J Surg 157:543–547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mealy K, Burke P, Hyland J (1992) Anterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: question of safety. Br J Surg 79:305–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karanija ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laxamana A, Solomon MJ, Cohen Z, Feinberg SM, Stern HS, Mc leod RS (1995) Long-term results of anterior resection using the double-stapling technique. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1246–1250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ (1994) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Eur J Surg 160:293–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wanebo HJ, Konnes RJ, Vezeridis MP, Cohn SI, Wrobleski DE (1994) Pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer. Ann Surg 220:586–595CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factor for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6(6):462–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Law W, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW (2000) Risk factor for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179:92–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby LT (1999) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk facto for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith JAE, King PM, Lane RHS (2003) Evidence of the effect of “specialization” on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex. Br J Surg 90:583–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curley SA, Allison DC, Smith DE (1988) Analysis of techniques and results in 347 consecutive colon anastomoses. Am J Surg 155:597–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, French Association for Surgical Research (1998) Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colonic or rectal resection: a prospective randomized study in 712 patients. Am Surg 227:179–186Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chien YY, Chung RC, Jeng-Yi W, Jinn-Shiun C, Hong HG, Jy-Ming C, Reiping T (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factor for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 241(1):9–13Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akyol AM, Mc Gregor HR, Galloway DJ, Murray GD, Gorge WD (1991) Anastomotic leaks in colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence? Int J Colorectal Dis 6:179–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merkel S, Wang WY, Scmidt O, Dworak O, Wittekind Ch, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2001) Locoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 3:154–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriele Valenti
    • 1
  • Costantino Campisi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alessandro Testa
    • 1
  • Alessandro Arturi
    • 1
  • Giovanni Torino
    • 1
  1. 1.Surgery DepartmentSan Pietro–Fatebenefratelli HospitalRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of MedicineNational Research Council, Biomedical Engineering Inst.RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations