Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Staging of colonic neoplasms by colonoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

In contrast to the situation in the upper gastrointestinal tract staging of colonic neoplasm by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has not gained importance because until yet preoperative staging is without any clinical consequences. This may change with the introduction of minimally invasive surgical procedures and endoscopic resection techniques as an alternative to conventional (open) surgery.

Patients and methods

We performed EUS with a miniprobe in 54 consecutive patients with colonic tumors who had been referred to our hospital for endoscopic resection or for laparoscopic resection of their lesions. Therefore patients with locally advanced tumors or systemic tumor spread were not included. After detection of the lesion during colonoscopy miniprobe EUS was performed with water-filling of the colonic lumen. The depth of invasion (T classification) and the local lymph node status (positive or negative) was ascertained. Lymph node-negative lesions staged as T1 underwent endoscopic resection whenever this was technically possible. In lymph node-negative T2–3 tumors laparoscopic resection was planned if they were localized at least 10 cm apart from the flexuras. All other lesions were resected by open surgery. The EUS findings were later compared with the final pathological results (pTN classification) of the resected specimen.

Results

In 50 patients (93%) a sufficient EUS evaluation of the colonic tumor was possible. In one patient with a tumor at the left flexura the lesion could not be completely visualized, and in three patients a sufficient water filling of the colon was impossible. The infiltration depth was correctly classified in 17 adenomas, 16 T1, 8 T2, 5 T3, and one T4-carcinoma (EUS accuracy for T staging: 94%). Two T2 and one T3 carcinoma were overstaged by EUS while no understaging was recorded. The lymph node status was correctly classified in 42/50 patients (84%), and a false-negative lymph node status was found in only 4/50 cases (8%). The overall accuracy of EUS was 80%.

Conclusion

Miniprobe EUS is suitable and has a sufficient but not optimal accuracy for staging of colonic neoplasm. Its employment makes sense if minimally invasive resection techniques in patients with high-risk for open surgery are planned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuntz C, Kienle P, Buhl, K, Glaser F, Herfarth C (1997) Flexible endoscopic ultrasonography of colonic tumors: indications and results. Endoscopy 29:865–870

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhutani MS, Nadella P (2001) Utility of an upper echoendoscope for endoscopic ultrasonography of malignant and benign conditions of the sigmoid/left colon and the rectum. Am J Gastroenterol 96:3318–3322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tseng LJ, Mo LR, Thian LT Jao YT (1999) Pre-operative staging of recto-sigmoid colon carcinoma by upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasonography. Hepatogastroenterology 46:891–893

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hünerbein M, Totkas S, Ghadimi BM, Schlag PM (2000) Preoperative evaluation of colorectal neoplasms by colonoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography. Ann Surg 232:46–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Waxman I, Saitoh Y (2000) Clinical outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial GI lesions and the role of high-frequency US probe sonography in an American population. Gastrointest Endosc 52:322–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saitoh Y, Obara T, Einami K, et al (1996) Efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound probes for the preoperative staging of invasion depth in flat and depressed colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 44:34–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsuruta O, Toyonaga A, Kawano H, et al (1998) Endoscopic ultrasonography staging of superficial-type colorectal neoplasms for mucosectomy. Endoscopy 30:92–93

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kudo S (1993) Endoscopic resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 25:455–461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wexner SD, Cohen SM (1995) Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82:295–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Santoro E, Carlini M, Carboni F, Feroce A (1999) Colorectal carcinoma: laparscopic versus traditional open surgery. A clinical trial. Hepatogastroenterology 46:900–904

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, MacDonald AW, et al (2000) Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 232:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  12. Köckerling F, Reymond MA, Schneider C, Hohenberger W (1997) Fehler und Gefahren in der onkologischen laparoskopischen Chirurgie. Chirurg 68:215–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Köckerling F (2000) Prospektive multizentrische Erhebungsstudie laparoskopische Chirurgie. Zentralbl Chir 125:164–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stergiou N, Riphaus A, Lange P, et al (2002) Endoscopic snare resection of large colonic polyps. How far can we go? Int J Colorectal Dis 18:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  15. Akasu T, Sunouchi K, Sawada T, et al (1990) Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of transrectal ultrasonography and computed tomography (abstract). Gastroenterology 98:298

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DMA, et al (1986) Preoperative assessment of local invasion of rectal cancer: digital examination, endoluminal sonography or compute tomography? Br J Surg 73:1015–1017

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks G (1989) Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology 170:319–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim NK, Kim MJ, Yun SH, et al (1999) Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:770–775

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomita H, Marcello PW, Milsom JW (1999) Laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. World J Surg 23:397–405

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishiguchi K, Okuda J, Toyoda M, Tanaka K, Tanigawa N (2001) Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopic and open surgeries for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 44:223–230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Senninger N, Brüwer M (2001) Kolorektales Karzinom. Minimal-invasive Chirurgie unter Qualitätsgesichtspunkten-Grenzen. Zentralbl Chir 126:289–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tseng LJ, Jao YTFN, Mo LR (2002) Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer with a balloon-sheathed miniprobe. Endoscopy 34:564–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamada S, Akahoshi K, Chijiwa Y, et al (1998) Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer by 15 MHz ultrasound miniprobe. Surgery 123:264–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshida M, Tsukamoto Y, Niwa Y, et al (1994) Endoscopic assessment of invasion of colorectal tumors with a new high-frequency ultrasound probe. Gastrointest Endosc 41:587–592

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Wehrmann.

Additional information

An invited commentary on this paper is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0507-y

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stergiou, N., Haji-Kermani, N., Schneider, C. et al. Staging of colonic neoplasms by colonoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography. Int J Colorectal Dis 18, 445–449 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0506-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0506-z

Keywords

Navigation