Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revision anorectoplasty in the management of anorectal anomalies

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twelve patients who had a revision posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) were evaluated by questionnaire. They were 11 months to 15 years old (median 5 years) at the time of revision surgery. All were born with an intermediate to high anorectal anomaly (ARM) and had ongoing problems of rectal prolapse (3), stenosis (1), faecal incontinence (9), or severe constipation (4). All but 1 had a huge megarectum with a poor anorectal angle and stool impaction, causing overflow incontinence. After revision surgery, marked improvement occurred in 7 and at least some improvement was achieved in the remaining 5. Previous severe constipation resolved in 2 and improved in another 2 children. The number of soiling episodes significantly decreased in 8 patients: while before surgery 8 had been wearing nappies all the time, only 2 use them postoperatively. The anorectal prolapse has resolved in 3 and sensation improved in 5, and as a group, there has been a reduced need for laxatives and rectal washouts. The favourable outcome of our patients confirms that PSARP is an excellent technique for revision surgery, and tapering of a secondary megarectum plus the formation of an anorectal angle can produce clinical improvement, even in more severe forms of ARM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted: 7 February 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hrabovszky, Z., Dewan, P. Revision anorectoplasty in the management of anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 18, 269–272 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003830100665

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003830100665

Navigation