Abstract
Background
Despite being a common condition in puberty, only 5–10% of pubertal gynecomastia need surgical treatment. Here the authors present their experiences with infra-areolar subcutaneous mastectomy in the surgical treatment of adolescent gynecomastia.
Methods
The records of patients who underwent infra-areolar subcutaneous mastectomy for adolescent gynecomastia between January 2004 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' demographic data, complaints and clinical presentation, physical examination, laboratory and radiological findings, surgical management, and postoperative follow-ups were evaluated. The patients were evaluated according to the localization of the gynecomastia (unilateral/bilateral) and according to the patients’ body mass index (BMI) (normal/overweight).
Results
A total of 21 boys with a mean age of 15 ± 1.4 years were operated by the senior author and infra-areolar subcutaneous mastectomy by a semilunar incision was performed for adolescent gynecomastia. The mean duration of the complaint was 24.2 ± 10.9 months. Gynecomastia was bilateral in 15 (71.5%) and unilateral in 6 (28.5%) of the patients. Sixteen patients (76.2%) were normal weight, 5 (23.8%) were overweight. Chromosomal anomaly and hypogonadism were detected in two patients. Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia was detected in the pathology of one patient. The mean follow-up time was 2.7 ± 1 years, seroma developed in 2 patients at the early postoperative period. Their long-term follow-up was uneventful without complication.
Conclusions
The results of infra-areolar subcutaneous mastectomy are very promising in pubertal gynecomastia due to good skin elasticity and without obesity in the adolescent age group. We believe that this method provides an almost invisible incision and a natural pectoral appearance for adolescent patients who have experienced serious emotional problems related to their body images.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Soliman AT, De Sanctis V, Yassin M (2017) Management of adolescent gynecomastia: an update. Acta Biomed 88(2):204–213. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i2.6665
Kim DH, Byun IH, Lee WJ, Rah DK, Kim JY, Lee DW (2016) Surgical management of gynecomastia: subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(6):877–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0705-y
Ma NS, Geffner ME (2008) Gynecomastia in prepubertal and pubertal men. Curr Opin Pediatr 20(4):465–470. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e328305e415
Uysal Ramadan S, Gökharman D, Kaçar M, Koşar P, Koşar U (2010) Assessment of vascularity with color Doppler ultrasound in gynecomastia. Diagn Interv Radiol 16(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.2395-08.1
Kasielska-Trojan A, Antoszewski B (2017) Gynecomastia surgery-impact on life quality: a prospective case-control study. Ann Plast Surg 78(3):264–268. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000860
Joodaki H, Panzer MB (2018) Skin mechanical properties and modeling: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 232(4):323–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411918759801
Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM, Adams WP Jr (2003) Classification and management of gynecomastia defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(2):909–923. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000042146.40379.25
Johnson RE, Murad MH (2009) Gynecomastia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. Mayo Clin Proc 84(11):1010–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60671-X
Yazici M, Sahin M, Bolu E, Gok DE, Taslipinar A, Tapan S, Torun D, Uckaya G, Kutlu M (2010) Evaluation of breast enlargement in young males and factors associated with gynecomastia and pseudogynecomastia. Ir J Med Sci 179(4):575–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0345-1
Hoyos AE, Perez ME, Domínguez-Millán R (2021) Gynecomastia treatment through open resection and pectoral high-definition liposculpture. Plast Reconstr Surg 147(5):1072–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007901
Wells JM, Liu Y, Ginter PS, Nguyen MT, Shin SJ (2015) Elucidating encounters of atypical ductal hyperplasia arising in gynaecomastia. Histopathology 66(3):398–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12545
Shehata BM, Fishman I, Collings MH, Wang J, Poulik JM, Ricketts RR et al (2009) Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of the breast in pediatric patients: an underrecognized entity. Pediatr Dev Pathol 12(6):450–454. https://doi.org/10.2350/08-09-0528.1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: Özlem Balcı, Ayşe Karaman Data acquisition: Ayşe Karaman Analysis and data interpretation: Ayşe Karaman, Özlem Balcı Drafting of the manuscript: Özlem Balcı, Ayşe Karaman, İbrahim Karaman Critical revision: Ayşe Karaman, İbrahim Karaman.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Balcı, Ö., Karaman, İ. & Karaman, A. Infra-areolar subcutaneous mastectomy in the surgical treatment of adolescent gynecomastia. Pediatr Surg Int 40, 92 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05671-7
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05671-7