Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current management of the urachal anomalies (UA). Lessons learned from the clinical practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It has been suggested that symptomatic UA requires surgical excision. However, the management of asymptomatic urachus is still controversial. We aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation, the efficacy of current modalities used, and postoperative pathology in patients with UA.

Materials and methods

We have performed a retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with UA and treated surgically or conservatively over 18 years. Demographic data, clinical presentation, imaging modalities, pathology, treatment, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-five symptomatic patients (18 males and seven females) with a median age of 13 years (1 month to 37 years) were identified. 15 (60%) were diagnosed with a urachal cyst, 4 (16%) with sinus, 3 (12%) with urachal diverticulum, and the remaining 3 (12%) with patent urachus.

Of those, 20 (80%) underwent surgical repair, and the remaining five (20%) patients were managed conservatively. 4 (20%) underwent laparotomy, 7 (35%) laparoscopic incision, and the remaining 9 (45%) laparoscopic robotic-assisted surgery. Nine patients required bladder cuff excision. The median operative time was 75 min (42–140 min).

One patient developed Clavien–Dindo grade IIIA complication resulting in infected hematoma, which resolved after drainage. Another patient with a complication of grade IIIB needed reoperation as a result of recurrent events of an abscess. 13 (65%) demonstrated epithelium lining of the urachus on postoperative pathology.

Conclusions

Our data show that most of the patients with UA presented with epithelial lining, which might lead to the later malignant transformation. It might cause a shift from the conservative management of asymptomatic patients to surgical intervention. Robotic-assisted surgery appears beneficial in these patients, especially when the bladder cuff excision is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

UA:

Urachus anomalies

US:

Ultrasound

VCUG:

Video cystourethrogram

References

  1. Yu JS, Kim KW, Lee HJ, Lee YJ, Yoon CS, Kim MJ (2001) Urachal remnant diseases: spectrum of CT and US findings. RadioGraphic 21(2):451–461. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.2.g01mr02451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Basuguy E, Okur MH, Zeytun H et al (2019) Management of symptomatic urachal cysts in children. Niger J Clin Pract 22(1):113–116. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_228_18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sato H, Furuta S, Tsuji S, Kawase H, Kitagawa H (2015) The current strategy for urachal remnants. Pediatr Surg Int 31(6):581–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3712-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siow SL, Mahendran HA, Hardin M (2015) Laparoscopic management of symptomatic urachal remnants in adulthood. Asian J Surg 38(2):85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nogueras-Ocaña M, Rodrıguez-Belmonte R, Uber J, Jimenez-Pacheco A, Merino-Salas S, Zuluaga-Gomez A (2014) Urachal anomalies in children: surgical or conservative treatment? J Pediatr Urol 10(3):522–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yiee JH, Gracia N, Baker LA, Barber R, Snodgrass WT, Wilcox DT (2017) A diagnostic algorithm for urachal anomalies. Pediatr Urol 3(6):500–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Metwalli ZA, Guillerman RP, Mehollin-Ray AR, Schlesinger AE (2013) Imaging features of intravesical urachal cysts in children. Pediatr Radiol 43(8):978–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2628-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Naiditch JA, Radhakrishnan J, Chin AC (2013) Current diagnosis and management of urachal remnants. J Pediatr Surg 48(10):2148–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiarenza SF, Bleve C (2016) Laparoscopic management of urachal cysts. Transl Pediatr 5(4):275–281. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2016.09.10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shah PH, Richstone L (2020) Bladder surgery for benign disease. In: Partin AW, Peters CA, Kavoussi LR, Dmochowski RR, Wein AJ (eds) Campbell-Walsh-Wein urology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3010–3047

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCollum MO, Macneily AE, Blair GK (2003) Surgical implications of urachal remnants: presentation and management. J Pediatr Surg 38(5):798–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/jpsu.2003.50170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun J, Zhu YJ, Shi CR, Zhao HT, He R, Liu GH (2010) Laparoscopic radical excision of the urachal remnant with recurrent infection in infants. J Endourol 24:1329–1332. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kufe DW (2009) Mucins in cancer: function, prognosis and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 9(12):874–885. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Copp H, Wong I, Krishnan C, Malhotra S, Kennedy W (2009) Clinical presentation and urachal remnant pathology: implications for treatment. J Urol 182:1921–1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, Grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dolev Perez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethics approval

We received approval from the institutional review board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 17027 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perez, D., Neeman, B., Kocherov, S. et al. Current management of the urachal anomalies (UA). Lessons learned from the clinical practice. Pediatr Surg Int 38, 1619–1623 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05194-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05194-z

Keywords

Navigation