Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Self-expanding intestinal expansion sleeves (IES) for short gut syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Many disease processes (necrotizing enterocolitis, caustic esophageal injury, malrotation with volvulus), can result in short-gut syndrome (SGS), where remnant intestinal segments may dilate axially, but rarely elongate longitudinally. Here we mechanically characterize a novel model of a self-expanding mesh prototype intestinal expanding sleeve (IES) for use in SGS.

Methods

Gut lengthening was achieved using a proprietary cylindrical layered polyethylene terephthalate IES device with helicoid trusses with isometric ends. The IES is pre-contracted by diametric expansion, deployed into the gut and anchored with bioabsorbable sutures. IES expansion to its equilibrium dimension maintained longitudinal gut tension, which may permit remodeling, increased absorptive surface area while preserving vascular and nervous supplies. We performed mechanical testing to obtain the effective force–displacement characterization achieved on these prototypes and evaluated minimal numbers of sutures needed for its anchoring. Furthermore, we deployed these devices in small and large intestines of New Zealand White rabbits, measured IES length–tension relationships and measured post-implant gut expansion ex vivo. Histology of the gut before and after implantation was also evaluated.

Results

Longitudinal tension using IES did not result in suture failure. Maximum IES suture mechanical loading was tested using 4–6 sutures; we found similar failure loads of 2.95 ± 0.64, 4 ± 1.9 and 3.16 ± 0.24 Newtons for 4, 6 and 8 sutures, respectively (n = 3, n.s). Pre-contracted IES tubes were deployed at 67 ± 4% of initial length (i.l.); in the large bowel these expanded significantly to 81.5 ± 3.7% of i.l. (p = 0.014, n = 4). In the small bowel, pre-contracted IES were 61 ± 3.8% of i.l.; these expanded significantly to 82.7 ± 7.4% of i.l. (p = 0.0009, n = 6). This resulted in an immediate 24 ± 7.8% and 36.2 ± 11% increase in gut length when deployed in large and small bowels, respectively, with maintained longitudinal tension. Maintained IES induced tension produced gut wall thinning; gut histopathological evaluation is currently under evaluation.

Conclusion

IES is a versatile platform for gaining length in SGS, which may be simply deployed via feeding tubes. Our results need further validation for biocompatibility and mechanical characterization to optimize use in gut expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sigalet DL (2001) Short bowel syndrome in infants and children: an overview. Semin Pediatr Surg 10:49–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Demehri FR et al (2015) Enteral autonomy in pediatric short bowel syndrome: predictive factors one year after diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg 50:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bianchi A (1980) Intestinal loop lengthening–a technique for increasing small intestinal length. J Pediatr Surg 15:145–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim HB et al (2003) Serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP): a novel bowel lengthening procedure. J Pediatr Surg 38:425–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greig CJ, Oh PS, Gross ER, Cowles RA (2019) Retracing our STEPs: Four decades of progress in intestinal lengthening procedures for short bowel syndrome. Am J Surg 217:772–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Squires RH et al (2012) Natural history of pediatric intestinal failure: initial report from the Pediatric Intestinal Failure Consortium. J Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.03.062

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Spencer AU et al (2006) Enterogenesis in a clinically feasible model of mechanical small-bowel lengthening. Surgery 140:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Safford SD, Freemerman AJ, Safford KM, Bentley R, Skinner MA (2005) Longitudinal mechanical tension induces growth in the small bowel of juvenile rats. Gut 54:1085–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huynh N et al (2016) Spring-mediated distraction enterogenesis in-continuity. J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demehri FR, Wong PM, Freeman JJ, Fukatsu Y, Teitelbaum DH (2014) A novel double-balloon catheter device for fully endoluminal intestinal lengthening. Pediatr Surg Int 30:1223–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Portelli KI et al (2021) Intestinal adaptation following spring insertion into a roux limb in mice. J Pediatr Surg 56:346–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubrovsky G, Huynh N, Thomas AL, Shekherdimian S, Dunn JC (2019) Intestinal lengthening via multiple in-continuity springs. J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ea M, Pi B, Dh T (2011) Redilation of bowel after intestinal lengthening procedures–an indicator for poor outcome. J Pediatr Surg 46:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbons TE, Casteel HB, Vaughan JF, Dassinger MS (2013) Staple line ulcers: a cause of chronic GI bleeding following STEP procedure. J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sudan D et al (2007) Comparison of intestinal lengthening procedures for patients with short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 246:593–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fallon EM et al (2014) Neonates with short bowel syndrome: an optimistic future for parenteral nutrition independence. JAMA Surg 149:663–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer AU et al (2005) Pediatric short bowel syndrome: redefining predictors of success. Ann Surg 242:403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park J, Puapong DP, Wu BM, Atkinson JB, Dunn JC (2004) Enterogenesis by mechanical lengthening: morphology and function of the lengthened small intestine. J Pediatr Surg 39:1823–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ralls MW et al (2013) Mesenteric neovascularization with distraction-induced intestinal growth: enterogenesis. Pediatr Surg Int 29:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Okawada M, Maria HM, Teitelbaum DH (2011) Distraction induced enterogenesis: a unique mouse model using polyethylene glycol. J Surg Res 170:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stark R, Zupekan T, Bondada S, Dunn JCD (2011) Restoration of mechanically lengthened jejunum into intestinal continuity in rats. J Pediatr Surg 46:2321–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Clayton.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clayton, S., Alexander, J.S., Solitro, G. et al. Self-expanding intestinal expansion sleeves (IES) for short gut syndrome. Pediatr Surg Int 38, 75–81 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-05024-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-05024-8

Keywords

Navigation