Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between cystic biliary atresia and choledochal cyst: a clinical controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript



It is difficult to distinguish cystic biliary atresia (CBA) from choledochal cyst (CC) before intraoperative cholangiography in neonates or young infants because of the similar ultrasonographic patterns and clinical manifestations. This study is to investigate the difference of clinical parameters between CBA and CC.


96 patients with cyst at hepatic hilum whose ages were less than 120 days during the period from Jan’2013 to Nov’2015 were retrospectively studied, they were divided into CBA group and CC group by intraoperative cholangiography, there were 29 cases of CBA and 67 cases of CC. It was compared and analyzed on laboratory data, preoperative ultrasonographic features, intraoperative cholangiography and histopathological results between the two groups. Data were quoted as means ± standard deviation (SD) or median (range), Student’s t test, non-parametric test and χ2 test were used as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered as significant statistical difference.


CBA group and CC group were comparable for the operative age (51.76 ± 23.99 days vs. 50.03 ± 26.38 days, P = 0.76), weight (4.60 ± 0.75 kg vs. 4.44 ± 1.03 kg, P = 0.46) and sex proportion (M/F: 9/20 vs. 20/47, P = 0.91). there were significant differences (CBA vs. CC) in ALT [59(3–375) vs. 30 (6–247) IU/L, P < 0.001], AST [140(30–694) vs. 44(18–410) IU/L, P < 0.001], T-Bil [190 (107–326) vs.87(5–310) μmol/L, P < 0.001], D-Bil [85 (31–174) vs.14(1–122) μmol/L, P < 0.001] and TBA [112 (23–269) vs.9(1–337) μmol/L, P < 0.001]. There was insignificant statistical difference in GGT [332(112–2154) vs. 226(21–1810) IU/L, P = 0.099] between CBA group and CC group. The cyst size in CBA group was obviously smaller than CC group (the maximum longitudinal diameter: 2.52 ± 1.16 cm vs. 4.71 ± 2.23 cm, P < 0.001; the maximum transverse diameter: 1.64 ± 0.75 cm vs. 3.41 ± 1.79 cm, P < 0.001). Significant differences presented in preoperative ultrasonographic features and histopathological results between the two groups.


CBA should be suspected if ultrasonography indicates small cyst with characteristic manifestations of BA and elevated laboratory data. GGT was an insensitive indicator in distinguishing CBA from CC. Cholangiography should be done for the suspected CBA patients as soon as possible to confirm the diagnosis and have surgical intervention timely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Hartley JL, Davenport M, Kelly DA (2009) Biliary atresia. Lancet 374(9702):1704–1713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davenport M, Kerkar N, Mieli-Vergani G et al (1997) Biliary atresia: the King’s College Hospital experience (1974–1995). J Pediatr Surg 32(3):479–485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hinds R, Davenport M, Mieli-Vergani G et al (2004) Antenatal presentation of biliary atresia. J Pediatr 144(1):43–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keplinger KM, Bloomston M (2014) Anatomy and embryology of the biliary tract. Surg Clin North Am 94(2):203–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka H, Sasaki H, Wada M, Sato T et al (2015) Postnatal management of prenatally diagnosed biliary cystic malformation. J Pediatr Surg 50(4):507–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kasai M, Sawaguchi S, Akiyama T et al (1976) A proposal of new classification of biliary atresia. J Jpn Sot Pediatr Surg 12:327–331

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu-Yao Z, Bu-Yun G, Le L et al (2012) Objective differential characteristics of cystic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts in neonates and young infants: sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med 31(6):833–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ichida F, Tsuji T, Omata M et al (1996) New Inumaya classification for histological assessment of chronic hepatitis. Hepatol Commun 6:112–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee WS, Chai PF (2010) Clinical features differentiating biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis. Ann Acad Med Singap 39(8):648–654

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka N, Ueno T, Takama Y et al (2010) Diagnosis and management of biliary cystic malformations in neonates. J Pediatr Surg 45(11):2119–2123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou KJ, Lin N, Xiao YT et al (2012) Elevated bile acids in newborns with Biliary Atresia (BA). PLoS ONE 7(11):e49270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou KJ, Wang J, Xie GX et al (2015) Distinct plasma bile acid profiles of biliary atresia and neonatal hepatitis syndrome. J Proteome Res 14(11):4844–4850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robie DK, Overfelt SR, Xie L (2014) Differentiating biliary atresia from other causes of cholestatic jaundice. Am Surg 80(9):827–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang KS, Huang LT, Huang YH (2007) Gamma-glutamyl transferase in the diagnosis of biliary atresia. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 48:196–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rendón-Macías ME, Villasís-Keever MA, Graciela C-M, María S-M (2008) Improvement in accuracy of gamma-glutamyl transferase for differential diagnosis of biliary atresia by correlation with age. Turk J Pediatr 50(3):253–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanaka H, Sasaki H, Wada M et al (2015) Postnatal management of prenatally diagnosed biliary cystic malformation. J Pediatr Surg 50(4):507–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saito T, Horie H, Yoshida H et al (2006) The perinatal transition of the hepatobiliary cyst size provides information about the condition of bile flow in biliary cystic malformation cases. J Pediatr Surg 41(8):1397–1402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun YH, Zheng S, Qian QY (2011) Ultrasonographic evaluation in the differential diagnosis of biliary atresia and infantile hepatitis syndrome. Pediatr Surg Int 27(7):675–679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanegawa K, Akasaka Y, Kitamura E et al (2003) Sonographic diagnosis of biliary atresia in pediatric patients using the “triangular cord” sign versus gallbladder length and contraction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(5):1387–1390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rastogi A, Krishnani N, Yachha SK, Khanna V et al (2009) Histopathological features and accuracy for diagnosing biliary atresia by prelaparotomy liver biopsy in developing countries. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24(1):97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen G, Xue P, Zheng S et al (2015) A pathological scoring system in the diagnosis and judgment of prognosis of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 50(12):2119–2123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The funding has been recevied from capital institute of pediatrics hospital’s ethical board with Grant no. SHERLL2013064.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Capital Institute of Pediatrics hospital’s ethical board (SHERLL2013064).

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

The individual written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective design.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, P., Dong, N., Pan, Y.K. et al. Comparison between cystic biliary atresia and choledochal cyst: a clinical controlled study. Pediatr Surg Int 38, 109–114 (2022).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: