Abstract
Purpose
The role of non-invasive measures of physiologic reserve, specifically the Compensatory reserve index (CRI) and the Shock index pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA), is unknown in the management of children with acute appendicitis. CRI is a first-in-class algorithm that uses pulse oximetry waveforms to continuously monitor central volume status loss. SIPA is a well-validated, but a discontinuous measure of shock that has been calibrated for children.
Methods
Children with suspected acute appendicitis (2–17 years old) were prospectively enrolled at a single center from 2014 to 2015 and monitored with a CipherOx CRI™ M1 pulse oximeter. CRI values range from 1 (normovolemia) to 0 (life-threatening hypovolemia). SIPA is calculated by dividing heart rate by systolic blood pressure and categorized as normal or abnormal, based on age-specific cutoffs. Univariate and multivariable regression models were developed with simple versus perforated appendicitis as the outcome.
Results
Almost half the patients (45/94, 48%) had perforated appendicitis. On univariate analysis, the median admission CRI value was significantly higher (0.60 versus 0.33, p < 0.001) and the ED SIPA values were significantly lower (0.90 versus 1.10, p = 0.002) in children with simple versus perforated appendicitis. In a multivariable model, only CRI significantly detected differences in the physiologic state between patients with simple and perforated appendicitis.
Conclusions
CRI is a non-invasive measure of physiologic reserve that may be used to accurately guide early management of children with acute simple versus perforated appendicitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Prystowsky JB, Pugh CM, Nagle AP (2005) Current problems in surgery. Append Curr Probl Surg 42(10):688–742
Dian A, Ali A, Azam UF, Khan MM (2011) Perforated appendix-our local experience. Rawal Med J 36(2):97–99
Blakely ML, Williams R, Dassinger MS, Eubanks JW, Fischer P, Huang EY et al (2011) Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 146(6):660–665
Maloney PJ (2013) Sepsis and septic shock. Emerg Med Clin 31(3):583–600
American Heart Association (2006) 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric advanced life support. Pediatrics 117(5):e1005–e1028
Sinniah D (2012) Shock in children. IeJSME 1:129–136
Larsen GY, Mecham N, Greenberg R (2011) An emergency department septic shock protocol and care guideline for children initiated at triage. Pediatrics 127(6):e1585–e1592
Florin T, Ludwig S, Aronson PL, Werner HC (2011) Netter’s pediatrics E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences
Biban P, Gaffuri M, Spaggiari S, Zaglia F, Serra A, Santuz P (2012) Early recognition and management of septic shock in children. Pediatr Rep 4(1):e13
Plunkett A, Tong J (2015) Sepsis in children. BMJ 9(350):h3017
Lemson J, Nusmeier A, van der Hoeven JG (2011) Advanced hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children. Pediatrics 128(3):560–571
Moulton SL, Mulligan J, Grudic GZ, Convertino VA (2013) Running on empty? The compensatory reserve index. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75(6):1053–1059
Choi YM, Leopold D, Campbell K, Mulligan J, Grudic GZ, Moulton SL (2018) Noninvasive monitoring of physiologic compromise in acute appendicitis: New insight into an old disease. J Pediatr Surg 53(2):241–246
Gupta S, Alam A (2018) Shock index-A useful noninvasive marker associated with age-specific early mortality in children with severe sepsis and septic shock: age-specific shock index cut-offs. J Intensive Care Med. P. 35:0885066618802779.
Nordin A, Coleman A, Shi J, Wheeler K, Xiang H, Acker S et al (2018) Validation of the age-adjusted shock index using pediatric trauma quality improvement program data. J Pediatr Surg 53(1):130–135
Acker SN, Ross JT, Partrick DA, Tong S, Bensard DD (2015) Pediatric specific shock index accurately identifies severely injured children. J Pediatr Surg 50(2):331–334
Traynor MD Jr, Hernandez MC, Clarke DL, Kong VY, Habermann EB, Polites SF et al (2019) Utilization of age-adjusted shock index in a resource-strained setting. J Pediatr Surg 54(12):2621–2626
Bröker ME, van Lieshout EM, van der Elst M, Stassen LP, Schepers T (2012) Discriminating between simple and perforated appendicitis. J Surg Res 176(1):79–83
van den Bogaard VAB, Euser SM, van der Ploeg T, de Korte N, Sanders DG, de Winter D et al (2016) Diagnosing perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients: a new model. J Pediatr Surg. 51(3):444–448
Mittal MK, Dayan PS, Macias CG, Bachur RG, Bennett J, Dudley NC et al (2013) Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children in a multicenter cohort. Acad Emerg Med 20(7):697–702
Lindestam U, Almström M, Jacks J, Malmquist P, Lönnqvist P, Jensen BL, et al (2019) Low plasma sodium concentration predicts perforated acute appendicitis in children: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Eur J Pediatr Surg
Ohle R, O’Reilly F, O’Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD (2011) The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med 9(1):139
Sencan A, Aksoy N, Yıldız M, Okur Ö, Demircan Y, Karaca İ (2014) The evaluation of the validity of Alvarado, Eskelinen, Lintula and Ohmann scoring systems in diagnosing acute appendicitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int 30(3):317–321
Phillips R, Acker S, Shahi N, Shirek G, Meier M, Goldsmith A, et al (2020) The Shock Index, Pediatric Age-Adjusted (SIPA) Enhanced: pre-hospital and emergency department SIPA values forecast transfusion needs for blunt solid organ injured children. Surgery 168(4):690–694
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest and source of funding
Dr. Moulton co-invented the Compensatory Reserve Index algorithm used in this study. The intellectual property is assigned to the Regents of the University of Colorado. Dr. Moulton co-founded Flashback Technologies, Inc. in 2009 and licensed the technology from the University. He is a consultant at Flashback Technologies, has an equity interest in the company, and receives royalty payments through the University of Colorado. Flashback Technologies did not sponsor this study. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest. No grant funding was used to support this research. Institutional funding was provided by the Children’s Hospital Colorado Foundation, Children's Hospital Colorado Center for Research in Outcomes in Children's Surgery, and generous support from the Colorado Firefighter Calendar.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was evaluated and approved by the Colorado Multiple Institution Review Board (COMIRB), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shahi, N., Phillips, R., Meier, M. et al. Comparison of non-invasive physiological assessment tools between simple and perforated appendicitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int 37, 851–857 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04876-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04876-4