Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High-frequency vs. conventional ventilation at the time of CDH repair is not associated with higher mortality and oxygen dependency: a retrospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The VICI-trial reported that in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) were equivalent using conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. The purpose of this study was to determine if the mode of ventilation at the time of CDH repair affected mortality or oxygen dependence at 28 days.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of infants born wih CDH from 1991 to 2015. A generalized linear model was applied to the data using a propensity score analysis.

Results

Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria; at the time of surgery 39 (48.8%) patients were on HFV and 41 (51.3%) patients were on CMV. In the HFV group, 16 (47.1%) patients remained oxygen dependent and there were 5 (12.8%) deaths at 28 days. In the CMV group, 5 (12.2%) patients remained oxygen dependent at 28 days but none had died. The base model demonstrated that the HFV group had increased rates of oxygen dependence [OR = 6.40 (2.13, 22.2), p = 0.002]. However, after propensity score analysis, we found no difference between HFV and CMV.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that in infants with CDH, there is no significant difference between HFV and CMV in oxygen dependency or death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Buys Roessingh AS, Dinh-Xuan AT (2009) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: current status and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 168(4):393–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-008-0904-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skari H, Bjornland K, Haugen G, Egeland T, Emblem R (2000) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a meta-analysis of mortality factors. J Pediatr Surg 35(8):1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2000.8725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balayla J, Abenhaim HA (2014) Incidence, predictors and outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study of 32 million births in the United States. J Matern Neonatal Med 27(14):1438–1444. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.858691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Logan JW, Cotten CM, Goldberg RN, Clark RH (2007) Mechanical ventilation strategies in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg 16(2):115–125. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2007.01.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuluz MA, Smith PB, Mears SP et al (2010) Preliminary observations of the use of high-frequency jet ventilation as rescue therapy in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 45(4):698–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.07.025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Keszler M, Modanlou HD, Brudno DS et al (1997) Multicenter controlled clinical trial of high-frequency jet ventilation in preterm infants with uncomplicated respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics 100(4):593–599. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.100.4.593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Migliazza L, Bellan C, Alberti D et al (2007) Retrospective study of 111 cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and presurgical stabilization. J Pediatr Surg 42:1526–1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Somaschini M, Locatelli G, Salvoni L, Bellan C, Colombo A (1999) Impact of new treatments for respiratory failure on outcome of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr 158(10):780–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004310051203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ng GYT, Derry C, Marston L, Choudhury M, Holmes K, Calvert SA (2008) Reduction in ventilator-induced lung injury improves outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia? Pediatr Surg Int 24(2):145–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-2051-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cacciari A, Ruggeri G, Mordenti M et al (2001) High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-12204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miguet D, Claris O, Lapillonne A, Bakr A, Chappuis J-P, Salle BL (1994) Preoperative stabilization using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Crit Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199422091-00008(22(SUPPL.):S77-S82)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reyes C, Chang LK, Waffarn F, Mir H, Warden MJ, Sills J (1998) Delayed repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia with early high- frequency oscillatory ventilation during preoperative stabilization. J Pediatr Surg 33:1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90523-1(W.B. Saunders)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van den Hout L, Reiss I, Felix JF et al (2010) Risk factors for chronic lung disease and mortality in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Neonatology 98(4):370–380. https://doi.org/10.1159/000316974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Snoek KG, Capolupo I, Van Rosmalen J et al (2016) Conventional mechanical ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. A randomized clinical trial (The VICI-trial). Ann Surg 263(5):867–874. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsao KJ, Lally KP (2008) The congenital diaphragmatic hernia study group: a voluntary international registry. Semin Pediatr Surg 17(2):90–97. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46(3):399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lally KP, Lally PA, Lasky RE et al (2007) Defect size determines survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics 120(3):e651–e657. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (2001) Estimating disease severity of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the first 5 minutes of life. J Pediatr Surg 36(1):141–145. https://doi.org/10.1053/JPSU.2001.20032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 79(387):516–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D'Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17(19):2265–2281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the DEVOTION Network and the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba; Dr. Richard Keijzer is the Thorlakson Chair in Surgical Research for the Department of Surgery and the University of Manitoba. Richard Keijzer (conceptualization, funding acquisition, resources, supervision, writing—review and editing).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Keijzer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All of the following authors—Matthew Levesque, Gabrielle Derraugh, Daryl Schantz, Melanie I. Morris, Anna Shawyer, Suyin A. Lum Min, Richard Keijzer—have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Derraugh, G., Levesque, M., Schantz, D. et al. High-frequency vs. conventional ventilation at the time of CDH repair is not associated with higher mortality and oxygen dependency: a retrospective cohort study. Pediatr Surg Int 36, 1275–1280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04740-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04740-x

Keywords

Navigation