Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical treatment of children and youth with congenital melanocytic nevi: self- and proxy-reported opinions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The role of surgery in the management of congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) is controversial. Data on surgical outcomes and predictors of satisfaction remain scarce.

Methods

An online survey was employed following worldwide recruitment of youth aged 14–25 years (n = 44) and parents of children ≤ 18 years (n = 249) with CMN to query patterns of treatment and satisfaction with and opinions about the benefits of surgery.

Results

In proxy-reports, 121 of 249 (49%) and in self-reports 30 of 44 (75%) participants underwent CMN excision. The most common reasons for surgery were psychosocial determinants, aesthetic improvement, and melanoma risk reduction. The overall satisfaction with surgical management was good, although no predictors for satisfaction could be identified. Higher current age of the child was found to predict decision regret in proxy-reports. Most participants indicated that having a scar is more socially acceptable than a CMN. Opinions differed on whether surgery should be deferred until the child is old enough to be involved in the decision-making process.

Conclusions

Whether and when to perform surgery in children with CMN is a multifaceted question. Awareness of common concerns as well as risks and benefits of surgery are essential to ensure critical reflection and balanced decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alikhan A, Ibrahimi OA, Eisen DB (2012) Congenital melanocytic nevi: where are we now?: Part I. Clinical presentation, epidemiology, pathogenesis, histology, malignant transformation, and neurocutaneous melanosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(4):495.e1–495.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castilla EE, Dutra M, Orioli-Parreiras IM (1981) Epidemiology of congenital pigmented naevi: I. Incidence rates and relative frequencies. Br J Dermatol 104(3):307–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1981.tb00954.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Price HN, Schaffer JV (2010) Congenital melanocytic nevi—when to worry and how to treat: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 28(3):293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kinsler VA, Birley J, Atherton DJ (2009) Great Ormond Street Hospital for children registry for congenital melanocytic naevi: prospective study 1988–2007. Part 2—evaluation of treatments. Br J Dermatol 160(2):387–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08901.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walton RG, Jacobs AH, Cox AJ (1976) Pigmented lesions in newborn infants. Br J Dermatol 95(4):389–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1976.tb00840.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lovett A, Maari C, Decarie JC et al (2009) Large congenital melanocytic nevi and neurocutaneous melanocytosis: one pediatric center’s experience. J Am Acad Dermatol 61(5):766–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zaal LH, Mooi WJ, Sillevis Smitt JH, van der Horst CMAM (2004) Classification of congenital melanocytic naevi and malignant transformation: a review of the literature. Br J Plast Surg 57(8):707–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.04.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinsler VA, O’Hare P, Bulstrode N et al (2017) Melanoma in congenital melanocytic naevi. Br J Dermatol 176(5):1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Arad E, Zuker RM (2014) The shifting paradigm in the management of giant congenital melanocytic nevi: review and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(2):367–376. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000436852.32527.8a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinsler V, Bulstrode N (2009) The role of surgery in the management of congenital melanocytic naevi in children: a perspective from Great Ormond Street Hospital. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 62(5):595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaffer JV (2015) Update on melanocytic nevi in children. Clin Dermatol 33(3):368–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.12.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krengel S, Marghoob AA (2012) Current management approaches for congenital melanocytic nevi. Dermatol Clin 30(3):377–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassanein AH, Rogers GF, Greene AK (2015) Management of challenging congenital melanocytic nevi: outcomes study of serial excision. J Pediatr Surg 50(4):613–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schiestl C, Stiefel D, Meuli M (2010) Giant naevus, giant excision, eleg(i)ant closure? Reconstructive surgery with Integra Artificial Skin® to treat giant congenital melanocytic naevi in children. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 63:610–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer BS, Corcoran J (2005) Treatment of large and giant nevi. Clin Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2004.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zaal LH, van der Horst CM (2009) Results of the early use of tissue expansion for giant congenital melanocytic naevi on the scalp and face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 62(2):216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim JM, Oh Y, Lee SH, Cho MY, Chung KY, Roh MR (2019) Comparison of treatment options for small to medium congenital melanocytic nevi: a retrospective review of 119 cases. Lasers Surg Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ott H, Krengel S, Beck O et al (2019) Multidisciplinary long-term care and modern surgical treatment of congenital melanocytic nevi—recommendations by the CMN surgery network. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 17(10):1005–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.13951_g

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Masnari O, Neuhaus K, Aegerter T, Reynolds S, Schiestl CM, Landolt MA (2019) Predictors of health-related quality of life and psychological adjustment in children and adolescents with congenital melanocytic nevi: analysis of parent reports. J Pediatr Psychol 44(6):714–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsz007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neuhaus K, Landolt MA, Theiler M, Schiestl C, Masnari O (2019) Skin-related quality of life in children and adolescents with congenital melanocytic nevi—analysis of self- and parent reports. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodman E, Adler NE, Kawachi I et al (2001) Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics 108(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.2.e31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YAM et al (2004) The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(7):1960–1965. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000122207.28773.56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Stissi V, Franchignoni F (2009) How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280902874196a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Van De Kar AL, Corion LUM, Smeulders MJC, Draaijers LJ, Van Der Horst CMAM, Van Zuijlen PPM (2005) Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the patient and observer scar assessment scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(2):514–522. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, vol 66. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krengel S, Reyes-Múgica M (2017) Melanoma risk in congenital melanocytic naevi. Br J Dermatol 176(5):1114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Koot HM, De Waard-Van Der Spek F, Peer CD, Mulder PGH, Oranje AP (2000) Psychosocial sequelae in 29 children with giant congenital melanocytic naevi. Clin Exp Dermatol. 25:589–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Olsen JR, Gallacher J, Finlay AY, Piguet V, Francis NA (2016) Quality of life impact of childhood skin conditions measured using the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 174(4):853–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wramp ME, Langenbruch A, Augustin M, Zillikens D (2017) Clinical course, treatment modalities, and quality of life in patients with congenital melanocytic nevi—data from the German CMN registry. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 15(2):159–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.12835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rumsey N, Harcourt D (2007) Visible difference amongst children and adolescents: issues and interventions. Dev Neurorehabil 10(2):113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490701217396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krengel S, Hauschild A, Schafer T (2006) Melanoma risk in congenital melanocytic naevi: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 155(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07218.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mosa A, Ho ES, Heinelt M, Karen BAS, Neuhaus K (2019) Management of congenital melanocytic nevi in the plastic surgery clinic: families’ expectations and their persistent concern about malignancy. Pediatr Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.13987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Slutsky JB, Barr JM, Femia AN, Marghoob AA (2010) Large congenital melanocytic nevi: associated risks and management considerations. Semin Cutan Med Surg 29(2):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sder.2010.04.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bhananker SM, Ramamoorthy C, Geiduschek JM et al (2007) Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: update from the pediatric perioperative cardiac arrest registry. Anesth Analg. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000268712.00756.dd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Loepke AW, Soriano SG (2008) An assessment of the effects of general anesthetics on developing brain structure and neurocognitive function. Anesth Analg 106(6):1681–1707. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318167ad77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mellon RD, Simone AF, Rappaport BA (2007) Use of anesthetic agents in neonates and young children. Anesth Analg 104(3):509–520. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000255729.96438.b0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fujiwara M, Nakamura YFH (2008) Treatment of giant congenital nevus of the back by convergent serial excision. J Dermatol 35(9):608–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2008.00534.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Berg P, Lindelöf B (2003) Congenital melanocytic naevi and cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res 13(5):441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from Nevus Outreach Inc. (http://www.nevus.org). Further, we thank everyone who participated in this study or helped with its promotion. A list of CMN patient organizations around the world can be found on http://www.naevusinternational.com or http://www.naevusglobal.org.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Nevus Outreach Inc. (http://www.nevus.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by KN, ML, and OM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KN and OM. All authors edited and commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathrin Neuhaus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neuhaus, K., Landolt, M., Vojvodic, M. et al. Surgical treatment of children and youth with congenital melanocytic nevi: self- and proxy-reported opinions. Pediatr Surg Int 36, 501–512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04633-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04633-z

Keywords

Navigation