Abstract
Purpose
The relationship between reflux index (RI) and bolus exposure parameters in multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) has not been examined sufficiently among children. The significance of acid and bolus exposure in evaluating pediatric reflux disease (RD) was explored by focusing on mucosal lesions.
Methods
We conducted MII-pH on 28 patients (median age 8 years) with suspected RD. We assessed relationships between RI and bolus exposure indices, and also compared acid and bolus exposures across patients grouped by endoscopic esophageal mucosal lesions.
Results
RI correlated significantly with distal acid reflux events (r = 0.60), acid bolus exposure time (BET) (0.55), and bolus clearance time (BCT) (0.48). Significant differences were observed among the control, non-erosive RD (NERD), and erosive RD (ERD) groups in all acid and several bolus exposure indices (distal and proximal frequencies, and BCT), while no significant difference was apparent between NERD and ERD. Acid exposure tended to be more severe in high-grade than in low-grade ERD, while no similar tendency was found in any bolus parameters other than BCT.
Conclusions
MII-pH showed great potential for investigating the pathophysiology of pediatric RD, with RI revealing different correlations with variable bolus exposure indices. However, no specific parameters allowing precise discrimination between RDs or mucosal severities were identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BCT:
-
Bolus clearance time
- BET:
-
Bolus exposure time
- ERD:
-
Erosive reflux disease
- GERD:
-
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
- MII:
-
Multichannel intramural impedance
- NERD:
-
Non-erosive reflux disease
- RD:
-
Reflux disease
- RI:
-
Reflux index
References
Avidan B, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG et al (2002) Acid reflux is a poor predictor for severity of erosive reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 47:2565–2573
Savarino E, Tutuian R, Zentilin P et al (2010) Characteristics of reflux episodes and symptom association in patients with erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease: study using combined impedance-pH off therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 105:1053–1061
Conchillo JM, Schwartz MP, Selimah M et al (2008) Acid and non-acid reflux patterns in patients with erosive esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD): a study using intraluminal impedance monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 53:1506–1512
Borrelli O, Salvatore S, Mancini V et al (2012) Relationship between baseline impedance levels and esophageal mucosal integrity in children with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 24:828-e394
Salvatore S, Hauser B, Devreker T et al (2009) Esophageal impedance and esophagitis in children: any correlation? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 49:566–570
van der Pol RJ, Loots CM, Peeters L et al (2013) Outcomes of endoscopy and novel pH-impedance parameters in children: is there a correlation? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 56:196–200
Bredenoord AJ, Hemmink GJ, Smout AJ (2009) Relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux pattern and severity of mucosal damage. Neurogastroenterol Motil 21:807–812
Liu YW, Wu JF, Chen HL et al (2016) The correlation between endoscopic reflux esophagitis and combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring in children. Pediatr Neonatol 57:385–389
Pilic D, Hankel S, Koerner-Rettberg C et al (2013) The role of baseline impedance as a marker of mucosal integrity in children with gastro esophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 48:785–793
Wenzl TG, Benninga MA, Loots CM, ESPGHAN EURO-PIG Working Group et al (2012) Indications, methodology, and interpretation of combined esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in children: ESPGHAN EURO-PIG standard protocol. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 55:230–234
Pilic D, Fröhlich T, Nöh F et al (2011) Detection of gastroesophageal reflux in children using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH measurement: data from the German Pediatric Impedance Group. J Pediatr 158:650.e1–654.e1
Mattioli G, Pini-Prato A, Gentilino V et al (2006) Esophageal impedance/pH monitoring in pediatric patients: preliminary experience with 50 cases. Dig Dis Sci 51:2341–2347
Fukahori S, Yagi M, Ishii S et al (2017) A baseline impedance analysis in neurologically impaired children: a potent parameter for estimating the condition of the esophageal mucosa. Neurogastroenterol Motil. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13012
Marcinkiewicz M, Han K, Zbroch T et al (2000) The potential role of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier components in the maintenance of integrity of the esophageal mucosa in patients with endoscopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1652–1660
Koek GH, Sifrim D, Lerut T et al (2008) Multivariate analysis of the association of acid and duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux exposure with the presence of oesophagitis, the severity of oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 57:1056–1064
Chen CL, Yi CH (2008) Utility of esophageal impedance in identifying dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis. Dis Esophagus 21:539–543
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saito, T., Uesato, M., Terui, K. et al. Acid and bolus exposure in pediatric reflux disease according to the presence and severity of esophageal mucosal lesions. Pediatr Surg Int 35, 887–893 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-019-04490-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-019-04490-5