Advertisement

Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 357–363 | Cite as

Developmental outcome at 3 years of age of infants following surgery for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

  • Alison Loughran-FowldsEmail author
  • Dermot T. McDowell
  • Claire Galea
  • Robert Halliday
  • Karen Walker
  • Nadia Badawi
  • Andrew J. A. Holland
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The study compared neurodevelopmental outcome at 3 years of age of infants with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) who underwent pyloromyotomy with healthy control infants in New South Wales, Australia.

Methods

Infants with IHPS as well as controls were recruited between August 2006 and July 2008. Developmental assessments were performed using the Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (version III) (BSITD-III) at 1 and 3 years of age.

Results

Of the 43 infants originally assessed at 1 year, 39 returned for assessment at 3 years (90%). The majority were term infants (77%). Assessments were also performed on 156 control infants. Infants with IHPS scored significantly lower on four of the five Bayley subsets (cognitive, receptive and expressive language and fine motor) compared to control infants. Analysis of co-variance showed statistically significant results in favour of the control group for these four subsets.

Conclusion

Compared with the outcomes at 1 year, infants with IHPS at 3 years of age continue to score below controls in four of the BSITD-III subscales. This suggests they should have developmental follow-up with targeted clinical intervention. There is a need for further studies into functional impact and longer term outcomes.

Keywords

Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis Neonate Outcome Development 

Abbreviations

IHPS

Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

BSITD-III

Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (version III)

GA

General anaesthesia

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the parents and carers, and also surgical colleagues who gave permission for their infants to be enrolled in this study.

Funding

The DAISy study was initially funded by the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation (Grant 12-FY06-232). No funding grants were obtained or required for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Alison Loughran-Fowlds declares she has no conflict of interest. Dermot T. McDowell declares he has no conflict of interest. Claire Galeaa declares she has no conflict of interest. Robert Halliday declares he has no conflict of interest. Karen Walker declares she has no conflict of interest. Nadia Badawi declares she has no conflict of interest. Andrew J. A. Holland declares he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    St Peter SD, Ostlie DJ (2008) Pyloric stenosis: from a retrospective analysis to a prospective clinical trial—the impact on surgical outcomes. Curr Opin Pediatr 20:311–314.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282ff0de9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aspelund G, Langer JC (2007) Current management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Semin Pediatr Surg 16:27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2006.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chung E (2008) Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: genes and environment. Arch Dis Child 93:1003–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.141499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adibe OO, Nichol PF, Flake AW, Mattei P (2006) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy at a high-volume pediatric teaching hospital. J Pediatr Surg 41:1676–1678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oomen MW, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R, Ubbink DT, Heij HA (2012) Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on major complications. Surg Endosc 26:2104–2110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2174-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Safford SD, Pietrobon R, Safford KM, Martins H, Skinner MA, Rice HE (2005) A study of 11,003 patients with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and the association between surgeon and hospital volume and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 40:967–972.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yagmurlu A, Barnhart DC, Vernon A, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2004) Comparison of the incidence of complications in open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: a concurrent single institution series. J Pediatr Surg 39:292–296. PMID: 15017540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gischler SJ, Mazer P, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Dijk M, Bax NMA, Hazebroek FWJ, Tibboel D (2009) Interdisciplinary structural follow-up of surgical newborns: a prospective evaluation. J Pediatr Surg 44:1382–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.12.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walker K, Loughran-Fowlds A, Halliday R, Holland AJ, Stewart J, Sholler GF, Winlaw DS, Badawi N (2015) Developmental outcomes at 3 years of age following major non-cardiac and cardiac surgery in term infants: a population-based study. J Paediatr Child Health 51:1221–1225.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Filan PM, Hunt RW, Anderson PJ, Doyle LW, Inder TE (2012) Neurologic outcomes in very preterm infants undergoing surgery. J Pediatr 160:409–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glatz P, Sandin RH, Pedersen NL, Bonamy AK, Eriksson LI, Granath F (2017) Association of anesthesia and surgery during childhood with long-term academic performance. JAMA Pediatr 171:e163470.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    DiMaggio C, Sun LS, Kakavouli A, Byrne MW, Li G (2009) A retrospective cohort study of the association of anesthesia and hernia repair surgery with behavioral and developmental disorders in young children. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 21:286–291.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181a71f11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartels M, Althoff RR, Boomsma DI (2009) Anesthesia and cognitive performance in children: no evidence for a causal relationship. Twin Res Hum Genet 12:246–253.  https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.12.3.246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davidson AJ, Disma N, de Graaff JC, Withington DE, Dorris L, Bell G et al (2016) Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age after general anaesthesia and awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387:239–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00608-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walker K, Halliday R, Holland AJ, Karskens C, Badawi N (2010) Early developmental outcome of infants with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 45:2369–2372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bayley N (2006) Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, 3rd edn. The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chinta S, Walker K, Halliday R, Loughran-Fowlds A, Badawi N (2014) A comparison of the performance of healthy Australian 3-year-olds with the standardised norms of the Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (version-III). Arch Dis Child 99:621–624.  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW, Victorian Infant Collaborative Group (2010) Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 164:352–356.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krogh C, Fischer TK, Skotte L, Biggar RJ, Oyen N, Skytthe A, Goertz S, Christensen K, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M (2010) Familial aggregation and heritability of pyloric stenosis. JAMA 303:2393–2399.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brambrink AM, Evers AS, Avidan MS, Farber NB, Smith DJ, Zhang X, Dissen GA, Creeley CE, Olney JW (2010) Isoflurane-induced neuroapoptosis in the neonatal rhesus macaque brain. Anesthesiology 112:834–841.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d049cd CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilder RT, Flick RP, Sprung J, Katusic SK, Barbaresi WJ, Mickelson C, Gleich SJ, Schroeder DR, Weaver AL, Warner DO (2009) Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology 110:796–804.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000344728.34332.5d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun LS, Li G, Miller TL, Salorio C, Byrne MW, Bellinger DC et al (2016) Association between a single general anesthesia exposure before age 36 months and neurocognitive outcomes in later childhood. JAMA 315:2312–2320.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.6967 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    The US Food and Drug Administration (2017) FDA review results in new warnings about using general anesthetics and sedation drugs in young children and pregnant women. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM533197.pdf. Accessed 19 Sep 2017
  24. 24.
    deBacker J, Hart N, Fan E (2016) Neuromuscular blockade in the 21st century management of the critically ill patient. Chest 151:697–706.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flick RP, Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Wilder RT, Voigt RG, Olson MD, Sprung J, Weaver AL, Schroeder DR, Warner DO (2011) Cognitive and behavioral outcomes after early exposure to anesthesia and surgery. Pediatrics 128:e1053–e1061.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    deLima J (2017) Departmental statement regarding potential neurotoxicity of anaesthetic agents in children. The Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network. https://www.schn.health.nsw.gov.au/files/attachments/anaesthesia_related_neurotoxicityv2.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018
  27. 27.
    Keunen K, van Elburg RM, van Bel F, Benders MJ (2015) Impact of nutrition on brain development and its neuroprotective implications following preterm birth. Pediatr Res 77:148–155.  https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taylor ND, Cass DT, Holland AJ (2013) Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: has anything changed? J Paediatr Child Health 49:33–37.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grace Centre for Newborn Intensive Care, The Children’s Hospital at WestmeadSydney Children’s Hospitals NetworkWestmeadAustralia
  2. 2.Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Douglas Cohen Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Children’s Hospital at WestmeadSydney Children’s Hospitals NetworkSydneyAustralia
  4. 4.The Cerebral Palsy AllianceSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations