Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novel use of porcine extracellular matrix in recurrent stricture following repair of tracheoesophageal fistula

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anastomotic stricture is a common complication following repair of esophageal atresia (EA). Many factors are thought to contribute to stricture formation and a variety of management techniques have been developed. In this case report, we describe the treatment of a recurrent anastomotic stricture following repair of long-gap esophageal atresia. Porcine bladder extracellular matrix (ECM) was mounted on a stent and delivered endoscopically to the site of recurrent stricture. An appropriate positioning was confirmed using direct endoscopic visualization and intra-operative fluoroscopy. The patient recovered well with persistent radiographic and functional improvements in previous stricture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Nice T, Tuanama Diaz B, Shroyer M, Rogers D, Chen M, Martin C et al (2016) Risk factors for stricture formation after esophageal atresia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(5):393–398. doi:10.1089/lap.2015.0120 (Epub 2016/02/19)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Serhal L, Gottrand F, Sfeir R, Guimber D, Devos P, Bonnevalle M et al (2010) Anastomotic stricture after surgical repair of esophageal atresia: frequency, risk factors, and efficacy of esophageal bougie dilatations. J Pediatr Surg 45(7):1459–1462. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu H, Shen C, Xiao X, Dong K, Zheng S (2015) Reoperation for anastomotic complications of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 50(12):2012–2015. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.015 (Epub 2015/08/28)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shankaran V, Brooks M, Mostow E (2013) Advanced therapies for chronic wounds: NPWT, engineered skin, growth factors, extracellular matrices. Dermatol Ther 26(3):215–221. doi:10.1111/dth.12050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown B, Lindberg K, Reing J, Stolz DB, Badylak SF (2006) The basement membrane component of biologic scaffolds derived from extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng 12(3):519–526. doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, Zhang L, Kukla KA, Wolf MT et al (2012) Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater. 8(3):978–987. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.031 (Epub 2011/12/02)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasse KC, Brandt J, Lim DC, Ackerman E (2013) Accelerated healing of complex open pilonidal wounds using MatriStem extracellular matrix xenograft: nine cases. J Surg Case Rep. doi:10.1093/jscr/rjt025

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorman RM, Vali K, Harmon CM, Zaritzky M, Bass KD (2016) Repair of esophageal atresia with proximal fistula using endoscopic magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) after staged lengthening. Pediatr Surg Int 32(5):525–528. doi:10.1007/s00383-016-3889-y (Epub 2016/03/24)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yanchar NL, Gordon R, Cooper M, Dunlap H, Soucy P (2001) Significance of the clinical course and early upper gastrointestinal studies in predicting complications associated with repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 36(5):815–822. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2001.22969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spitz L, Kiely E, Brereton RJ (1987) Esophageal atresia: five year experience with 148 cases. J Pediatr Surg 22(2):103–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Randolph JG, Newman KD, Anderson KD (1989) Current results in repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula using physiologic status as a guide to therapy. Ann Surg. 209(5):526–530 (discussion 30-1)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lal D, Miyano G, Juang D, Sharp NE, St Peter SD (2013) Current patterns of practice and technique in the repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: an IPEG survey. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 23(7):635–638. doi:10.1089/lap.2013.0210 (Epub 2013/06/12)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Golden J, Demeter N, Lim J, Ford H, Upperman J (2017) Routine post-operative esophagram is not necessary after repair of esophageal atresia 213(4):640–644. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.020

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E et al (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198(4):536–541. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.026 (discussion 41-2)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Donington JS (2006) Functional conduit disorders after esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 16(1):53–62. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dua KS, Hogan WJ, Aadam AA, Gasparri M (2016) In vivo oesophageal regeneration in a human being by use of a non-biological scaffold and extracellular matrix. Lancet. 388(10039):55–61. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01036-3 (Epub 2016/04/08)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee E, Milan A, Urbani L, De Coppi P, Lowdell MW (2017) Decellularized material as scaffolds for tissue engineering studies in long gap esophageal atresia. Expert Opin Biol Ther. doi:10.1080/14712598.2017.1308482 (Epub 2017/03/27)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fryfogle JD, Cyrowski GA, Rothwell D, Rheault G, Clark T (1963) Replacement of the middle third of the esophagus with a silicone rubber prosthesis. An experiment and clinical study. Dis Chest 43:464–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukushima M, Kako N, Chiba K, Kawaguchi T, Kimura Y, Sato M et al (1983) Seven-year follow-up study after the replacement of the esophagus with an artificial esophagus in the dog. Surgery 93(1 Pt 1):70–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakase Y, Nakamura T, Kin S, Nakashima S, Yoshikawa T, Kuriu Y et al (2008) Intrathoracic esophageal replacement by in situ tissue-engineered esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 136(4):850–859. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.05.027 (Epub 2008/08/09)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daley WP, Peters SB, Larsen M (2008) Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 3):255–264. doi:10.1242/jcs.006064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takimoto Y, Teramachi M, Okumura N, Nakamura T, Shimizu Y (1994) Relationship between stenting time and regeneration of neoesophageal submucosal tissue. ASAIO J 40(3):M793–M797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nieponice A, McGrath K, Qureshi I, Beckman EJ, Luketich JD, Gilbert TW et al (2009) An extracellular matrix scaffold for esophageal stricture prevention after circumferential EMR. Gastrointest Endosc. 69(2):289–296. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.022 (Epub 2008/07/26)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Afaneh C, Abelson J, Schattner M, Janjigian YY, Ilson D, Yoon SS et al (2015) Esophageal reinforcement with an extracellular scaffold during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 22(4):1252–1257. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4125-4 (Epub 2014/10/16)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Koivusalo AI, Pakarinen MP, Lindahl HG, Rintala RJ (2015) Revisional surgery for recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula and anastomotic complications after repair of esophageal atresia in 258 infants. J Pediatr Surg. 50(2):250–254. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.004 (Epub 2014/11/07)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Parolini F, Leva E, Morandi A, Macchini F, Gentilino V, Di Cesare A et al (2013) Anastomotic strictures and endoscopic dilatations following esophageal atresia repair. Pediatr Surg Int. 29(6):601–605. doi:10.1007/s00383-013-3298-4 (Epub 2013/03/22)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Macchini F, Parente G, Morandi A, Farris G, Gentilino V, Leva E (2017) Classification of Esophageal Strictures following Esophageal Atresia Repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1598656 (Epub 2017/03/06)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah B. Cairo.

Additional information

Presentations

Quickshot presentation at International Pediatric Endosurgery Group conference in London, England, July 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cairo, S.B., Tabak, B., Harmon, C.M. et al. Novel use of porcine extracellular matrix in recurrent stricture following repair of tracheoesophageal fistula. Pediatr Surg Int 33, 1027–1033 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4130-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4130-3

Keywords

Navigation