Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novel use of porcine urinary bladder matrix for pediatric pilonidal wound care: preliminary experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Extracellular matrix is used in various applications. We present our preliminary experience using a new device that consists of a porcine extracellular matrix with an epithelial basement membrane (MatriStem®, ACell, Inc. Columbia, MD, USA) for adolescent pilonidal disease.

Methods

A retrospective review of four patients with pilonidal disease was undertaken. Three occurred in the gluteal cleft, and the fourth in the umbilicus. In the first patient, the wound deficit was filled with lyophilized MicroMatrix powder and a sheet of Multilayer Wound Matrix was placed to cover the wound. In the second patient, two sinus tracts were debrided, packed with MicroMatrix, and a sheet of fenestrated Burn Matrix was applied. In the third patient, MicroMatrix and Surgical Matrix PSMX (six-layer) was applied as a roll filling the dead space. In the last patient, an umbilical sinus 3 cm deep was packed with MicroMatrix powder followed by a rolled sheet of 2-ply Surgical Matrix RS. Patients were evaluated weekly post-operatively, and more MicroMatrix and sheet material was added if a wound deficit was still present. Measurements were taken in two dimensions, diameter and depth, to characterize wounds.

Results

Resolution of wound deficit was graphed versus time. Pain was assessed by scoring 0–10. Rapid wound closure was achieved. Two of the patients had failed wound healing with saline dressing changes prior to MatriStem application. These two patients in particular were highly satisfied with the comfort of the MatriStem approach relative to their time with saline dressings. Most had no pain after 1 week when bolster sutures were removed.

Conclusion

In the treatment of open pilonidal wounds in adolescents, porcine urinary bladder matrix wound care devices offer closure times and cost similar to well-established methods while offering a substantial advantage in terms of patient comfort and convenience. This preliminary experience supports a prospective study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2010) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database System Rev (1):Cd006213. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3

  2. Baharestani M, Amjad I, Bookout K, Fleck T, Gabriel A, Kaufman D, McCord SS, Moores DC, Olutoye OO, Salazar JD, Song DH, Teich S, Gupta S (2009) V.A.C. Therapy in the management of paediatric wounds: clinical review and experience. Int Wound J 6(Suppl 1):1–26

  3. Fike FB, Mortellaro VE, Juang D, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD (2011) Experience with pilonidal disease in children. J Surg Res 170(1):165–168. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.02.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J (2008) Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 336(7649):868–871

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shankaran V, Brooks M, Mostow E (2013) Advanced therapies for chronic wounds: nPWT, engineered skin, growth factors, extracellular matrices. Dermatol Ther 26(3):215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rommer EA, Peric M, Wong A (2013) Urinary bladder matrix for the treatment of recalcitrant nonhealing radiation wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 26(10):450–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kimmel H, Rahn M, Gilbert TW (2010) The clinical effectiveness in wound healing with extracellular matrix derived from porcine urinary bladder matrix: a case series on severe chronic wounds. J Am Coll Cert Wound Special 2(3):55–59. doi:10.1016/j.jcws.2010.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nieponice A, Ciotola FF, Nachman F, Jobe BA, Hoppo T, Londono R, Badylak S, Badaloni AE (2014) Patch esophagoplasty: esophageal reconstruction using biologic scaffolds. Ann Thorac Surg 97(1):283–288. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sasse KC, Brandt J, Lim DC, Ackerman E (2013) Accelerated healing of complex open pilonidal wounds using MatriStem extracellular matrix xenograft: nine cases. J Surg Case Rep. doi:10.1093/jscr/rjt025

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart AM, Baker JD, Elliott D (2011) The effects of a sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus wound on activities of living: thematic analysis of participant interviews. J Clin Nurs 20(21–22):3174–3182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart AM, Baker JD, Elliott D (2012) The psychological wellbeing of patients following excision of a pilonidal sinus. J Wound Care 21(12):595–596, 598–600

  12. Gaiser MR, Lee SB, Enk A, Schrott P, Weisser H (2013) Surgical intervention of pilonidal sinus: impact on patients’ postoperative satisfaction and return to work time. Euro J Dermatol 23(4):487–490

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nasr A, Ein SH (2011) A pediatric surgeon’s 35-year experience with pilonidal disease in a Canadian children’s hospital. Can J Surg 54(1):39–42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Caniano DA, Ruth B, Teich S (2005) Wound management with vacuum-assisted closure: experience in 51 pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg 40(1):128–132. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.09.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biter LU, Beck GM, Mannaerts GH, Stok MM, van der Ham AC, Grotenhuis BA (2014) The use of negative-pressure wound therapy in pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard open wound care after surgical excision. Dis Colon Rectum 57(12):1406–1411. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasse KC, Ackerman EM, Brandt JR (2013) Complex wounds treated with MatriStem xenograft material: case series and cost analysis. OA Surg 1(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lecheminant J, Field C (2012) Porcine urinary bladder matrix: a retrospective study and establishment of protocol. J Wound Care 21(10):476–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, Zhang L, Kukla KA, Wolf MT, Daly KA, Reing JE, Badylak SF (2012) Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater 8(3):978–987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gilbert TW, Stewart-Akers AM, Badylak SF (2007) A quantitative method for evaluating the degradation of biologic scaffold materials. Biomaterials 28(2):147–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Dorman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dorman, R.M., Bass, K.D. Novel use of porcine urinary bladder matrix for pediatric pilonidal wound care: preliminary experience. Pediatr Surg Int 32, 997–1002 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3915-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3915-0

Keywords

Navigation