Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 31, Issue 9, pp 815–819 | Cite as

Anorectal injuries in children: a 20-year experience in two centers

  • Inbal Samuk
  • Zvi Steiner
  • Elad Feigin
  • Arthur Baazov
  • Elena Dlugy
  • Enrique Freud
Original Article
  • 260 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Anorectal injuries in children are not frequently reported and their management is challenging. This report reviews the experience in managing this type of injuries in two medical centers over 20 years.

Methods

An institutional database search for patients who were treated for anorectal injuries between 1994 and 2015 was undertaken. Twenty cases were located and medical records reviewed. This study was conducted with institutional review board approval (#572-14).

Results

There were 6 girls and 14 boys with ages ranging between 1 and 15 years (mean 7 years). Eleven patients sustained penetrating trauma, while nine sustained blunt trauma. The mechanism of injury was variable and associated injuries were more common in blunt trauma. Most common presenting symptoms were rectal bleeding (n = 12) and anal pain (n = 11), followed by abdominal pain in six patients. Eighteen anorectal injuries were extraperitoneal and two intraperitoneal. Among patients with extraperitoneal injuries, 12/18 were managed by primary repair with (6) or without (6) fecal diversion and 2/18 by wound irrigation and drainage with fecal diversion and delayed repair. Four patients had superficial anal and perineal injuries that were irrigated and left to heal by secondary intention. Two patients with intraperitoneal rectal injuries underwent primary repair with fecal diversion. Follow-up period ranged from 2 weeks to 8 years (mean 2 years). There were three cases of wound infection, one case of suture line leak requiring reoperation and one case of vesicorectal fistula in a patient with combined trauma of the rectum and urinary bladder. There was no mortality. Fecal continence was preserved in all patients available for follow-up evaluation.

Conclusions

Primary repair of the perineal wound and anal sphincters can be performed safely in most cases given hemodynamic stability. Fecal diversion should be saved for cases with severe perineal involvement or cases with substantial associated injuries and concern of gross contamination.

Keywords

Anorectal injury Anal sphincter repair Perineal injury Impalement 

References

  1. 1.
    Kim S, Linden B, Cendron M et al (2006) Pediatric anorectal impalement with bladder rupture: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 41:E1–E3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonnard A, Zamakhshary M, Wales PW (2007) Outcomes and management of rectal injuries in children. Pediatr Surg Int 23:1071–1076CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haut ER, Nance ML, Keller MS et al (2004) Management of penetrating colon and rectal injuries in the pediatric patient. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1526–1532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vincent MV, Abel C, Duncan ND (2012) Penetrating anorectal injuries in Jamaican children. Pediatr Surg Int 28:1101–1107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hashish AA (2011) Perineal trauma in children: a standardized management approach. Ann Pediatr Surg 7:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guha P, Vaze D, Rao KL (2012) Rectal impalement presenting as bladder stones: delayed and unusual presentation. J Pediatr Urol 8:e4–e6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bronkhorst MW, Wilde JC, Hamming JF, Heij HA (2007) Anorectal impalement in a pediatric patient with transanal evisceration of small bowel. J Pediatr Surg 42:e23–e25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benjelloun EB, Ahallal Y, Khatala K et al (2013) Rectal impalement with bladder perforation: a review from a single institution. Urol Ann 5:249–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cass AS, Luxenberg M (1987) Features of 164 bladder ruptures. J Urol 138:743–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steiner Z, Mogilner G, Eldar S (1995) Combined penetrating trauma of the rectum and urinary bladder. Harefuha 1:276–278Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ooi CK, Goh HK, Tay SY et al (2010) Patients with pelvic fracture: what factors are associated with mortality? Int J Emerg Med 3:299–304PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aihara R, Blansfield JS, Millham FH et al (2002) Fracture locations influence the likelihood of rectal and lower urinary tract injuries in patients sustaining pelvic fractures. J Trauma 52:205–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonzalez RP, Phelan H 3rd, Hassan M et al (2006) Is fecal diversion necessary for nondestructive penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries? J Trauma 61:815–819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russell KW, Soukup ES, Metzger RR et al (2014) Fecal continence following complex anorectal trauma in children. J Pediatr Surg 49:349–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pena A, Levitt MA (2002) Colonic inertia disorders in pediatrics. Curr Probl Surg 39:666–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inbal Samuk
    • 1
  • Zvi Steiner
    • 2
  • Elad Feigin
    • 1
  • Arthur Baazov
    • 1
  • Elena Dlugy
    • 1
  • Enrique Freud
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Schneider Children’s Medical Center, Sackler Medical SchoolUniversity of Tel AvivTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric Surgery, Meir Hospital, Sackler Medical SchoolUniversity of Tel AvivTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations