Skip to main content
Log in

Single-site laparoscopic appendectomy in children using conventional instruments: a prospective, randomized, control trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Single-site laparoscopic surgery (SSLS) is still only used in limited situations to treat children with appendicitis. Using conventional laparoscopic (CL) equipment to perform SSLS appendectomy is considered a valuable application in China. This prospective randomized trial aims to evaluate the surgical outcome of SSLS and CL appendectomy using CL equipment.

Methods

Sixty patients were recruited and randomly assigned to receive SSLS or 3-port CL appendectomy between February 2011 and June 2013. Each case of SSLS appendectomy was performed using CL instruments. Surgery outcomes, including operative time, conversion rates, postoperative complications, hospital stays, and hospital costs were evaluated.

Results

Patient characteristics were similar between groups. The SSLS using CL instruments was successful in all the 30 patients and no conversions occurred. Mean operative time was longer in the SSLS group than the CL group (64.3 ± 3.1 vs 53.0 ± 2.9 min, respectively; p = 0.000). Complication rates, lengths of hospital stay, and hospital costs were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

The findings of this study demonstrate that using conventional instruments to perform SSLS is technically feasible and safe in children. Although SSLS appendectomy does increase the operative time, it does not increase the complication rate and hospital cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Wikholm L, Naderi N, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2011) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population. Am J Surg 202:733–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dutta S (2009) Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. J Pediatr Surg 44:1741–1745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Knott EM, Gasior AC, Holcomb GW III, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD (2012) Impact of body habitus on single-site laparoscopic appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis: subset analysis from a prospective, randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:404–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D et al (2011) Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 254:586–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Abellan I, Parrilla P (2013) Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 257:413–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Poon MC, Wong SK, Leong HT, Lai PB, Ng EK (2012) A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of laparoendoscopic single-site access versus conventional 3-port appendectomy. Ann Surg 256:909–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sozutek A, Colak T, Dirlik M, Ocal K, Turkmenoglu O, Dag A (2013) A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:74–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Milas M, DeveCija S, Trkulja V (2014) Single incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: up-dated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Surgeon 12:271–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee WS, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Lee WK, Baek JH, Lee TH (2013) Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 257:214–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krpata DM, Ponsky TA (2011) Instrumentation and equipment for single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 20:190–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tam YH, Lee KH, Sihoe JD, Chan KW, Cheung ST, Pang KK (2010) Initial experience in children using conventional laparoscopic instruments in single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Pediatr Surg 45:2381–2385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter JT, Kaplan JA, Nguyen JN (2014) A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 218:950–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stylianos S, Nichols L, Ventura N, Malvezzi L, Knight C, Burnweit C (2011) The “all-in-one” appendectomy: quick, scarless, and less costly. J Pediatr Surg 46:2336–2341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deie K, Uchida H, Kawashima H, Tanaka Y, Masuko T, Takazawa S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: exteriorization of the appendix is a key component of a simple and cost-effective surgical technique. Pediatr Surg Int 29:1187–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung JW, Cha WH, Lee BK, Lee S, Lee SB, Lee SE, Jeong CW (2014) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using innovative articulating instruments: preclinical evaluation of the prototype. J Endourol 28:281–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. St Peter SD (2010) Appendicitis. In: Holcomb GW III, Murphy P, Ostlie DJ (eds) Ashcraft’s pediatric surgery. Saunders Elsevier Publishers, Holland, pp 549–556

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Perez EA, Piper H, Burkhalter LS, Fischer AC (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery in children: a randomized control trial of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 27:1367–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garey CL, Laituri CA, Ostlie DJ, Snyder CL, Andrews WS, Holcomb GW 3rd, St Peter SD (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery in children: initial single-center experience. J Pediatr Surg 46:904–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 207:613–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Di Franco F, Harris AM (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy. Br J Surg 100:1709–1718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gasior AC, Knott EM, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD (2014) Patient and parental scar assessment after single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 49:120–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Experiment designs and statistical analyses were supported by the Department of Statistics, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Conflict of interest

The manuscript is an original work and has not been published in another journal. All the listed authors have participated in the study and approved the submitted manuscript. None of the authors have any possible conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zonghai Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, K., Yang, L., Wu, A. et al. Single-site laparoscopic appendectomy in children using conventional instruments: a prospective, randomized, control trial. Pediatr Surg Int 31, 167–171 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3636-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3636-1

Keywords

Navigation