Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting postoperative respiratory tract function in type-C esophageal atresia. Thoracoscopic versus open repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

We assessed the outcome of 72 cases of type-C esophageal atresia (EAc) treated by open (OR) or thoracoscopic (TR) repair from 2000 to 2013. During OR, direct lung retraction (DLR) is required but during TR, CO2 insufflation causes lung collapse so DLR is unnecessary.

Methods

Patient demographics, operative time, respiratory tract impact (RTI: incidence of atelectasis, timing of extubation, need for reintubation, and duration of chest tube insertion), narcotic usage, commencement of oral feeding, and length of hospitalization (LOH) were compared.

Results

Seven long-gap cases were excluded, leaving 65 EAc subjects (TR = 25, OR = 40). Patient demographics, operative time, and duration of chest tube insertion were similar. No TR case required DLR. Significant differences were found in TR for narcotic usage (1.6 vs. 3.1 days), commencement of feeding (7.8 vs. 10.5 days), incidence of atelectasis (8 vs. 30 %), initial extubation (2.8 vs. 5.6 days), and LOH (33 vs. 46 days), (all p < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative tracheal tube blockage caused by excessive secretions (4 vs. 10 %) and reintubation (4 vs. 17.5 %) were less in TR but not significant. There were three anastomotic leakages in TR, one in OR.

Conclusion

TR is less traumatic than OR because DLR is unnecessary, resulting in lower RTI and smooth recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothenberg SS (2000) Thoracoscopic repair of a tracheoesophageal in a neonate. Pediatr Endosurg Innovati Tech 150–156

  2. Rothenberg SS (2002) Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistula in newborns. J Pediatr Surg 37:869–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen T, Zainabadi K, Bui T et al (2006) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: lessons learned. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:174–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lugo B, Malhotra A, Guner Y et al (2008) Thoracoscopic versus open repair of tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:753–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krosnar S, Baxter A (2005) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: anesthetic and intensive care management of a series of eight neonates. Paediatr Anaesth 15:541–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holcomb GW 3rd, Rothenberg SS, Bax KM et al (2005) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg 242:422–428 (discussion 428–430)

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Szavay PO, Zundel S, Blumenstock G et al (2011) Perioperative outcome of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula undergoing open versus thoracoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shimotakahara A, Sueyoshi R, Lane GJ et al (2010) The benefit of stay sutures during thoracoscopic esophagoesophagostomy in patients with esophageal atresia: a technical report. Pediatr Surg Int 26:443–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P et al (1996) Premature infant pain profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain 12:13–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Zee DC, Bax NM (2003) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with distal fistula. Surg Endosc 17:1065–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehane JR, Jordan C, Jones JG (1980) Influence of halothane and enflurane on respiratory airflow resistance and specific conductance in anaesthetized man. Br J Anaesth 52:773–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Findik G, Gezer S, Sirmali M et al (2008) Thoracotomies in children. Pediatr Surg Int 4:721–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalfa N, Allal H, Raux O et al (2005) Tolerance of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in neonates. Pediatrics 116:e785–e791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McKinnon LJ, Kosloske AM (1990) Prediction and prevention of anastomotic complications of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 25:778–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers ML, Duffy JP (2000) Surgical aspects of chronic post-thoracotomy pain. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 18:711–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perttunen K, Tasmuth T, Kalso E (1999) Chronic pain after thoracic surgery: a follow-up study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:563–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamataka A, Koga H, Okawada M et al (2014) Knacks for the thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. Video Session: Presented at the 51st annual meeting of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons held in Osaka (in Japanese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Koga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koga, H., Yamoto, M., Okazaki, T. et al. Factors affecting postoperative respiratory tract function in type-C esophageal atresia. Thoracoscopic versus open repair. Pediatr Surg Int 30, 1273–1277 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3618-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3618-3

Keywords

Navigation