Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perioperative outcomes of primary renal tumour resections: comparison of in-hours to out-of-hours surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Primary resection is typically performed for children with localised suspected Wilms tumours. Resource limitation may necessitate performing these operations nights and weekends. We hypothesise that outcomes will be worse in patients having nephrectomies out-of-hours (OOH) compared to those in-hours (IH).

Methods

With IRB ethics approval, primary renal tumour resections performed on oncology patients from 1989–2011 were reviewed retrospectively. IH operations were defined as Monday–Friday 0745–1530 hours. Outcomes included major intraoperative complications, capsule rupture, and blood loss. Data were analysed using Fischer Exact and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results

There were 64 patients with renal tumours who underwent primary resection. Forty-five procedures were performed IH, and 19 OOH. Groups were similar in age, ASA status, tumour size and grade. In a comparison of major intraoperative complications, capsule rupture, and mean blood loss, differences were 2 vs. 26 % (p = 0.007), 27 vs. 42 % (p = 0.12), 178 vs. 244 ml (p = 0.15) for IH and OOH respectively. There was one perioperative mortality (OOH).

Conclusions

Primary renal tumour resections performed OOH were associated with an increase in major complications compared to those performed in standard hours. Avoidance of OOH operating where possible may reduce morbidity for children undergoing primary renal tumour resections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakamura L, Ritchey M (2010) Current Management of Wilms’ Tumor. Curr Urol Rep 11:58–65. doi:10.1007/s11934-009-0082-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grundy PE, Breslow NE, Li S et al (2005) Loss of heterozygosity for chromosomes 1p and 16q is an adverse prognostic factor in favorable-histology Wilms tumor: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23(29):7312–73213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dome JS, Cotton CA, Perlman EJ et al (2006) Treatment of anaplastic histology Wilms’ tumor: results from the fifth National Wilms’ Tumor Study. J Clin Oncol 24(15):2352–23584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shamberger RC, Anderson JR, Breslow NE et al (2010) Long-term outcomes for infants with very low risk Wilms tumor treated with surgery alone in National Wilms Tumor Study-5. Ann Surg 251(3):555–558

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ricci WM, Gallagher B, Brandt A, Schwappach J, Tucker M, Leighton R (2009) Is after-hours orthopaedic surgery associated with adverse outcomes? A prospective comparative study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 01:2067–2072. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aya AG, Mangin R, Robert C, Ferrer JM, Eledjam JJ (1999) Increased risk of unintentional dural puncture in night-time obstetric epidural anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 46:665–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Komen N, Dijk J, Lalmahomed Z, Klop K, Hop W, Kleinrensink G-J, Jeekel H, Schouten W, Lange J (2009) After-hours colorectal surgery: a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:789–795. doi:10.1007/s00384-009-0692-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. George TJ, Arnaoutakis GJ, Merlo CA, Kemp CD, Baumgartner WA, Conte JV, Shah AS (2011) Association of operative time of day with outcomes after thoracic organ transplant. JAMA 305:2193–2199. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Turrentine F, Wang H, Young J, Calland J (2010) What is the safety of non-emergent operative procedures performed at night? A study of 10,426 operations at an academic tertiary care hospital using the American college of surgeons national surgical quality program improvement database. J Trauma 69:313–319. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e49291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schieman C, MacLean A, Buie W, Rudmik L, Ghali W, Dixon E (2008) Does surgeon fatigue influence outcomes after anterior resection for rectal cancer? Am J Surg 195:684–688. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.009

  11. Lonze BE, Parsikia A, Feyssa EL, Khanmoradi K, Araya VR, Zaki RF, Segev DL, Ortiz JA (2010) Operative start times and complications after liver transplantation. Am J Transpl 10:1842–1849. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03177.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Studer P, Inderbitzin D (2009) Surgery-related risk factors. Curr Opin Crit Care 15:328–332. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832be4de

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reebye SC, Blair GK, Rogers PC, Jamieson D, Skarsgard ED (2006) An audit of cancer diagnosis in a Canadian children’s hospital: quality, timing and efficiency. Paediatr Child Health 11:143–147

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gray AJG, Hoile RW, Ingram GS, Sherry KM (1997) The report of the national confidential enquiry into perioperative deaths. National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/pdf/1996_7/Full%20Report%201996%20-%201997.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2014

  16. Cullinane M, Gray AJG, Hargraves CMK, Lansdown M, Martin IC, Schubert M (2003) The 2003 report of the national confidential enquiry into perioperative deaths. National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/pdf/2003/03full.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2014

  17. Schoem SR, Finck C (2012) Time out for surgeons: when is the attending surgeon too tired? Conn Med 76:171–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ritchey ML, Shamberger RC, Haase G, Horwitz J, Bergemann T, Breslow NE (2001) Surgical complications after primary nephrectomy for Wilms’ tumor: report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group. J Am Coll Surg 192:63–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertram A, Hyam D, Hapangama N (2013) Out-of-hours maxillofacial trauma surgery: a risk factor for complications? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:214–217. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2012.11.001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McCormick F, Kadzielski J, Landrigan CP, Evans B, Herndon JH, Rubash HE (2012) Surgeon fatigue: a prospective analysis of the incidence, risk, and intervals of predicted fatigue-related impairment in residents. Arch Surg 147:430–435. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Kraker J, Graf N, van Tinteren H et al (2004) Reduction of postoperative chemotherapy in children with stage I intermediate-risk and anaplastic Wilms’ tumour (SIOP 93-01 trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:1229–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bogaert GA, Heremans B, Renard M, Bruninx L, De Wever L, Van Poppel H (2009) Does preoperative chemotherapy ease the surgical procedure for Wilms tumor? J Urol 182:1869–1874. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jennings AG, Saeed K, Dolan S, Wise DI (1999) Impact of the introduction of a daily trauma list on out-of-hours operating. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 81:65–68

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Office of Paediatric Surgical Evaluation and Innovation and British Columbia Children’s Hospital for their support for this project.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia A. Butterworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forbes, C., Butterworth, S.A. Perioperative outcomes of primary renal tumour resections: comparison of in-hours to out-of-hours surgery. Pediatr Surg Int 30, 1003–1007 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3560-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3560-4

Keywords

Navigation