Skip to main content

The management of postoperative reflux in congenital esophageal atresia–tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose

Esophageal atresia (EA), with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), is associated with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER). We performed a systematic review of the literature regarding routine anti-reflux medication post EA-TEF repair and its impact on postoperative GER and associated complications.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, CENTRAL (Cochrane library) electronic databases and gray literature. Full-text screening was performed in duplicate. Included articles reported a primary diagnosis of EA-TEF, a secondary diagnosis of postoperative GER, and primary treatment of GER with anti-reflux medications.

Results

Screening of 2,910 articles resulted in 25 articles (1,663 patients) for analysis. Most were single-center studies (92 %) and retrospective (76 %); there were no randomized control trials. Fifteen studies named the class of anti-reflux agent used, 3 the duration of therapy, and none either the dose prescribed or number of doses. Complications were inconsistently reported. Anti-reflux surgery was performed in 433/1,663 (26.0 %) patients. Average follow-up was 53.2 months (14 studies).

Conclusion

The quality of literature regarding anti-reflux medication for GER post EA-TEF repair is poor. There are no well-outlined algorithms for anti-reflux agents, doses, or duration of therapy. Standardized protocols and reliable reporting are necessary to develop guidelines to better manage postoperative GER in EA-TEF patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Romeo G, Zuccarello B, Proetto F (1987) Disorders of the esophageal motor activity in atresia of the esophagus. J Pediatr Surg 22:120–124

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawahara H, Kubota A, Hasegawa T et al (2007) Lack of distal esophageal contractions is key determinant of gastroesophageal reflux disease after repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 42:2017–2021

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spitz L, Esophageal atresia (1996) Past, present, and future. J Pediatr Surg 31:19–25

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dave S, Bajpai M, Gupta DK et al (1999) Esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula: a review. Indian J Pediatr 66:759–772

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson DG, Beasley SW (1991) Gastroesophageal reflux. In: Beasley SW, Myers NA, Auldist AW (eds) Esophageal Atresia. Chapman Hall Medical, London, pp 341–358

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Krug E, Bergmeijer JH, Dees J et al (1999) Gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett’s esophagus in adults born with esophageal atresia. Am J Gastroenterol 94:2825–2828

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deurloo JA, Ekkelkamp S, Bartelsman JF et al (2003) Gastroesophageal reflux: prevalence in adults older than 28 years after correction of esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 238:686–689

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sistonen SJ, Koivusalo A, Lindahl H et al (2008) Cancer after repair of esophageal atresia: population-based long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Surg 43:602–605

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coran AG, Caldamone A, Adzick NS et al (2012) Pediatric Surgery, 7th edn. Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chittmittrapap S, Spitz L, Kiely EM et al (1990) Anastomotic stricture following repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 25:508–511

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nambirajan L, Rintala RJ, Losty PD et al (1998) The value of early postoperative oesophagography following repair of oesophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 13:76–78

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Serhal L, Gottrand F, Sfeir R et al (2010) Anastomotic stricture after surgical repair of esophageal atresia: frequency, risk factors, and efficacy of esophageal bougie dilatations. J Pediatr Surg 45:1459–1462

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Michaud L, Gottrand F (2011) Anastomotic strictures: conservative treatment. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 52:S18–S19

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pashankar D, Blair GK, Israel DM (2001) Omeprazole maintenance therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease alter failure of fundoplication. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 32:145–149

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassall E, Kerr W, El-Serag HB (2007) Characteristics of children receiving proton pump inhibitors continuously for up to 11 years duration. J Pediatr 150:262–267

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. James LP (2003) Efficacy and safety measurements of proton pump inhibitors in infants and children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 37:S46–S51

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Braga LH, Mijovic H, Farrokhyar F et al (2013) Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections in antenatal hydronephrosis. Pediatrics 131:e251–e261

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Howick J, Chalmer I, Glasziou, et al OCEBM levels of evidence working group. “The Oxford levels of evidence 2”. Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed May 5, 2014

  20. Kubiak R, Spitz L, Kiely EM et al (1999) Effectiveness of fundoplication in early infancy. J Pediatr Surg 34:295–299

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp

  22. Review Manager (RevMan) (2012) Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane centre, The Cochrane collaboration

  23. Bergmeijer JH, Tibboel D, Hazebroek FW (2000) Nissen fundoplication in the management of gastroesophageal reflux occurring after repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 35:573–576

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holschneider P, Dubbers M, Engelskirchen R et al (2007) Results of the operative treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in childhood with particular focus on patients with esophageal atresia. Eu J Pediatr Surg 17:163–175

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wheatley MJ, Coran AG, Wesley JR (1993) Efficacy of the Nissen fundoplication in the management of gastroesophageal reflux following esophageal atresia repair. J Pediatr Surg 28:53–55

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Curci MR, Dibbins AW (1998) Problems associated with a Nissen fundoplication following tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia repair. JAMA Surg 123:618–620

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schneider A, Ferreira CG, Kauffmann I et al (2011) Modified Spitz procedure using a Collis gastroplasty for the repair of long-gap esophageal atresia. Eu J Pediatr Surg 21:178–182

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Healey PJ, Sawin RS, Hall DG et al (1998) Delayed primary repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: is it worth the wait? JAMA Surg 133:526–552

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chittmittrapap S, Spitz L, Brereton RJ et al (1993) Postoperative elective ventilation in babies with “marked anastomotic tension” after repair of esophageal atresia. J Med Assoc Thailand 76:683–687

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Burjonrappa SC, Youssef S, St-Vil D (2011) What is the incidence of Barrett’s and gastric metaplasia in esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) patients. Eur J Pediatr Surg 21:25–29

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lilja HE, Wester T (2008) Outcome in neonates with esophageal atresia over the last 20 years. Pediatr Surg Int 24:531–536

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sistonen SJ, Koivusalo A, Nieminen U et al (2010) Esophageal morbidity and function in adults with repaired esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: a population-based long-term follow-up. Ann Surg 251:1167–1173

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kawahara H, Okuyama H, Mitani Y et al (2009) Influence of thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair on esophageal motor function and gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Surg 44:2282–2286

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Koivusalo A, Pakarinen MP, Rintala RJ (2007) The cumulative incidence of significant gastro oesophageal reflux in patients with oesophageal atresia with a distal fistula—a systematic clinical, pH-metric, and endoscopic follow-up study. J Pediatr Surg 42:370–374

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yanchar NL, Gordon R, Cooper M et al (2001) Significance of the clinical course and early upper gastrointestinal studies in predicting complications associated with repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 36:815–822

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schier F, Korn S, Michel E (2001) Experiences of a parent support group with the long-term consequences of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 36:605–610

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moriarty K, Jacir NN, Harris BH et al (1996) Trans-anastomotic feeding tubes in repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 31:53–55

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Montgomery M, Frenckner B (1993) Esophageal atresia: mortality and complications related to gastroesophageal reflux. Eur J Pediatr Surg 3:335–338

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Koch A, Rohr S, Plaschkes J et al (1986) Incidence of gastroesophageal reflux following repair of esophageal atresia. Progress Pediatr Surg 19:103–113

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Blyth B, Davidson JR (1984) Tracheo-oesophageal fistula in Christchurch: a review. New Zeal Med J 97:42–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Louis D, Bourgeois J, Jaubert de Beaujeu M et al (1987) Reflux gastro-oesophagien et atresie de l’oesophage. Pediatrie 42:479–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Montgomery M, Frenckner B (1991) Esophageal pH monitoring for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in children with repaired esophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 6:304–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Leendertse-Verloop K, Tibboer D, Huzebroek FWJ et al (1987) Postoperative morbidity in patients with esophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 2:2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. van der Zee DC, Bax DC, Klaas NM (2007) Thoracoscopic treatment of esophageal atresia with distal fistula and of tracheomalacia. Sem Pediatri Surg 16:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Genty E, Attal P, Nicollas R et al (1999) Congenital tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhi 48:231–238

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Thomas EJ, Kumar R, Dasab J et al (2003) Radionuclide scintigraphy in the evaluation of gastro-oesophageal reflux in post-operative oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula patients. Nucl Med Commun 24:317–320

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Steward DJ (1982) Preterm infants are more prone to complications following minor surgery than are term infants. Anesthesiology 56:304–306

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun L (2010) Early childhood general anaesthesia exposure and neurocognitive development. Brit J Anaesth 105:i61–i68

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Halliday HL (1980) History of surfactant from 1980. Biol Neonate 87:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Beck CA (2009) Selection bias in observational studies: Out of control? Neurology 72:108–109

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hill JL, Pelligrini CA, Burrington JD et al (1977) Technique and experience with 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring in children. J Pediatr Surg 12:877–887

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Koch A, Gass R (1981) Continuous 20–24 hr Esophageal pH-monitoring in infancy. J Pediatr Surg 16:109–113

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nielsen RG, Kruse-Andersen S, Husby S (2003) Low reproducibility of 20–24-hour continuous esophageal pH monitoring in infants and children a limiting factor for interventional studies. Digestive Dis Sci 48:1495–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kibel MA (1978) Gastroesophageal reflux and failure to thrive in infancy. In: Gellis SS (ed) Gastroesophageal reflux. Report of the 76th ross conference on pediatric research. Ross Laboratories, Columbus, pp 39–47

    Google Scholar 

  55. Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Nelis F, Dent J et al (2000) Long term omeprazole treatment in resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy, safety, and influence on gastric mucosa. Gastroeneterology 118:661–669

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang WH, Huang JQ, Zheng GF et al (2005) Head-to-head comparison of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of erosive esophagitis: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 11:4067–4077

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Smith PM, Kerr GD, Cockel R et al (1994) A comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine in the prevention of recurrence of benign esophageal stricture. Restore investigator group. Gastroenterology 107:1312–1318

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Tolia V, Wuerth A, Thomas R (2003) Gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of presenting symptoms, evaluation, management, and outcome in infants. Dig Dis Sci 48:1723–1729

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Springer M, Atkinson S, North J et al (2008) Safety and pharmacodynamics of lansoprazole in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease aged  <1 year. Paediatr Drugs 10:255–263

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Heyman MB, Zhang W, Huang B et al (2007) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lansoprazole in children 13 to 24 months old with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 44:35–40

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. James LP, Kearns GL (1996) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine in paediatric patients. Clin Pharmacokinet 31:103–110

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kovesi T (2004) Long term complications of congenital esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula. Chest 126:915–925

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Orringer MB, Kirsh MM, Sloan H (1997) Long-Term Esophageal Function Following Repair of Esophageal Atresia. Ann Surg 186:436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Coopman Michaud S, Halna-Tamine L et al (2008) Long-term outcome of colon interposition after esophagectomy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 47:458–462

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tannuri U, Maksoud-Filho JG, Tannuri AC et al (2007) Which is better for esophageal substitution in children, esophagocoloplasty or gastric transposition? a 27-year experience of a single center. J Pediatr Surg 42:500–504

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Spitz L, Kiely E, Pierro A (2004) Gastric transposition in children: a 21-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 39:276–281

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lindahl H, Rintala R, Louhimo I (1989) Failure of the Nissen fundoplication to control gastroesophageal reflux in esophageal atresia patients. J Pediatr Surg 24:985–987

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hatch KF, Daily MF, Christensen BJ et al (2004) Failed fundoplications. Am J Surg 18:786–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Faria R, Bojke L, Epstein D et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication versus continued medical management for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on long-term follow-up of the REFLUX trial. Br J Surg 100:1205–1213 (REFLUX trial group)

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Anvari M, Allen C, Marshall J et al (2011) A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): 3-year outcomes. Surg Endosc 25:2547–2554

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Greuger B (2010) Weaning from the breast. http://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/weaning-from-the-breast. Accessed June 6, 2014

  72. Schalamon J, Lindahl H, Saarikoski H et al (2003) Endoscopic follow-up in esophageal atresia—for how long is it necessary? J Pediatr Surg 38:702–704

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:332–336 (The PRISMA Group)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349 (STROBE Initiative)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:698–702 (The CONSORT Group)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank David Kanters and Jorge Zequeira for their assistance with data management, and Janet Rowe for her assistance with editing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna C. Shawyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shawyer, A.C., D’Souza, J., Pemberton, J. et al. The management of postoperative reflux in congenital esophageal atresia–tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review. Pediatr Surg Int 30, 987–996 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3548-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3548-0

Keywords

  • Esophageal atresia
  • Tracheoesophageal fistula
  • Gastroesophageal reflux
  • Postoperative management