Skip to main content
Log in

Scrotal antegradesclerotherapy demonstrates anatomical variations on venous drainage in paediatric, adolescent and young adult varicoceles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim of the study

Anatomical variations on venous drainage in varicoceles are under-reported. We report our experience in scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy (SAS) for adolescent varicoceles.

Methods

Since 2011, 15 consecutive boys with left varicoceles were recruited. Under general anaesthesia, a 5-mm transverse incision was made at scrotal neck, testicular vein was cannulated at pampiniform plexus with venogram performed. Foam sclerosant by mixing sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STS), Lipiodol® and air was slowly injected under fluoroscopy. Postoperatively the patients were followed-up for varicocele grading, testicular size, and complications.

Main results

Median age at operation was 14 (10–19) years. 80 % had grade three varicoceles, 33.3 % had smaller left testis before operation. Intra-operative venogram showed three different anatomical variations. Group I: eleven patients (73.3 %) had single distinct internal spermatic vein; Group II: two patients demonstrated duplication of internal spermatic vein draining into left renal vein; Group III: two patients had pampiniform plexus draining to iliac and/or paraspinal veins. SAS was performed in Group I and II patients. Sclerosant volume injected ranged from 1.5 to 4.5 ml. In Group III patients, surgical ligation of testicular veins was performed rather than SAS to avoid uncontrolled systemic sclerosant spillage. Mean length of stay was 1.13 day. One patient with scrotal haematoma and one other with minor wound dehiscence were managed conservatively. Mean follow-up period was 10.9 (1–22) months. Thirteen patients (86.7 %) achieved varicocele grading ≤1. There was no postoperative testicular atrophy, hydrocele and epididymo-orchitis.

Conclusion

Scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy using STS foam is a safe and effective treatment for adolescent varicoceles. Anatomical variations on venous drainage in varicoceles are common.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akbay E, Cayan S, Doruk E, Duce MN, Bozlu M (2000) The prevalence of varicocele and varicocele-related testicular atrophy in Turkish children and adolescents. BJU Int 86:490–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meacham RB, Townsend RR, Rademacher D, Dros JA (1994) The incidence of varicoceles in the general population when evaluated by physical examination, gray scale sonography and color Doppler sonography. J Urol 151:1535–1538

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagler HM, Luntz RK, Martinis FG (1997) Varicocele. In: Lipshultz LI, Howards SS (eds) Infertility in the male, 3rd edn. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, pp p336–p359

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tauber R, Weizert P, Pfeifer KJ, Huber R. Die (1988) antegrade Sklerosierung der Vena SpermaticazurTherapie der Varikozele. Einerandomisierte, kontrollierte, prospektive Studie Verhandlungsber Dtsch Ges Urol. 40:239–240

  5. Tauber R, Johnsen N (1994) Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele: technique and late results. J Urol 151:386–390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazzoni G, Spagnoli A, Lucchetti MC, Villa M, Capitanucci ML, Ferro F (2001) Adolescent varicocele: tauberantegradesclerotherapy versus Palomo repair. J Urol 166:1462–1464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zaupa P, Mayr J, Höllwarth ME (2006) Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for treating primary varicocele in children. BJU Int. 97:809–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubin L, Amelar RD (1988) Varicocelectomy: twenty-five years of experience. Int J Fertil 33:226–228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Porst H, Bähren W, Lenz M, Altwein JE (1984) Percutaneous sclerotherapy of varicoceles–an alternative to conventional surgical methods. Br J Urol 56:73–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ficarra V, Sarti A, Novara G, Dalpiaz O, Galfano A, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2004) Modified antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy in adolescent patients with varicocele. J Pediatr Surg 39:1034–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ficarra V, Porcaro AB, Righetti R, Cerruto MA, Pilloni S, Cavalleri S, Malossini G, Artibani W (2002) Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicocele: a prospective study. BJU Int 89:264–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. L. Y. Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, Y.S., Chung, K.L.Y., Lo, K.W.Y. et al. Scrotal antegradesclerotherapy demonstrates anatomical variations on venous drainage in paediatric, adolescent and young adult varicoceles. Pediatr Surg Int 30, 107–111 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3413-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3413-6

Keywords

Navigation